Judicial Corruption Exposed For All To See Clearly

Report by Lon Willoughby at ABC of Health


Why Do We Report Judicial Corruption Issues At This Website?

     Reviewing the judicial corruption reported herein can help visitors understand why Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., as president of ABC's of Health, Inc., imposed some very serious access restrictions on our natural healthcare and wellness concepts education for two specific professions in America. 

     Most of the Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts education presented at this Website is not available to members of the legal profession or members of the various law enforcement professions in America.  Those situations are explained briefly in our Terms of Use department.  We will explain those situations in more detail in this special department.

     This very important information can help each visitor develop a much better understanding of how the judicial systems in America actually work - typically in a very selfish self-serving manner that helps keep the money machine working well for local attorneys and lawyers and the court systems. 

     Yes, it is all about money, power, and control over the general public with a little bit of fairness and justice sprinkled in here and there to make it all appear to be a good thing for Americans.

     The person that is writing this report is not a lawyer, but he has been involved in the judicial systems in America a lot more than an average American adult.  He will report very important information herein that no attorney, no lawyer, and no judge will ever share with the America public.

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., the founder and president of ABC's of Health, Inc., doing business as (dba) ABC of Health, has personally litigated in state county courts, state circuit courts, and state appellate courts.  He has also litigated in the federal circuit court and the federal appellate court.

     Lonnie (Lon) has filed and prosecuted more than ten appeal cases, and he took two of his appeal cases all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.  That is a significant legal project; most attorneys or lawyers in America will never file an appeal in the high court. 

     You will learn herein that there are some important reasons why most attorneys or lawyers in America will not attempt to take that very difficult and expensive legal action.  Stay with Lon Jr. in this report, and you will learn some very important information that may be very helpful to your future.


Why Should You Carefully Review This Information?

     It is in your best interest to take time to carefully review this exceptionally important and interesting report about unfair, unethical, criminal-minded selfish and self-serving judicial corruption in American courts - trial courts and appellate courts (state and federal) - all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

     Reviewing the unfair and unethical judicial corruption reported herein will enable you to understand some very important points about your vulnerability if you ever have to litigate in a local area court or at a distant location in your home state.  As Lon learned the hard way, and in an extremely expensive way, your vulnerability can be much worse if you ever need to litigate in another state's court system. The further away from your home any litigation action is located - the worse it will likely be for you. 

     You also need to understand that litigation actions will normally be taken in the location where the offending action occurred - an automobile accident location, a fight altercation, or an attack on you. If an offending incident occurs in a distant state, as an injured person or party you will generally have to litigate your complaint actions in the appropriate court where the incident occurred.  This can turn out to be very difficult and frustrating and very stressful, very time consuming, and likely very expensive.

     The information herein can be very important to you if you travel to distant locations in your home state, and it can be even more important to you if you ever do any traveling outside of your home state. 

     You need to understand that the judicial systems in America are structured, managed, and operated in a manner that makes it very easy for attorneys, lawyers, and judges throughout the judicial systems in different states to conduct litigation actions in unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded self-serving ways whenever the local trial attorneys and the local trial court judge collusively decide to conduct a litigation process in that manner.  There can be a number of self-serving reasons why they might choose to conduct a litigation process in that manner (such as to maliciously and ruthlessly harass, persecute, and punish a litigant - as they did with Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for more than 20 years).

 

Trial Court Judges and Law Enforcement Activities

     This very important report will also expose the very "cooperative relationships" that usually exist between the judicial systems in America and the various law enforcement systems in America.  This seems like a logical and reasonable situation, but read on to learn why this can be a very bad situation.

     You will learn herein that the judicial systems in America, over many years, have severely corrupted the various law enforcement systems in very selfish self-serving ways that enable the judicial systems in America to conveniently and easily operate in unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving ways that can be very beneficial to many members of the legal professions in America (the legal brotherhood). 

     Those selfish self-serving actions are typically very harmful to millions of American citizens each year on a continuing basis - year after year.  Unfortunately, those appalling and disgustingly unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial conditions are likely to get worse, rather than better, as the future of America continues to develop.  This report will enable visitors to understand these serious conditions.

     This judicial report will also make it very easy for visitors to help Lon Willoughby spread the word about the frightening potential for Judicial Corruption in American Courts.  Becoming aware of these dangers is the very important "first step" for citizens to take in protecting themselves from judicial corruption.  If co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had already learned about these extremely dangerous judicial conditions, he would not have gotten involved in the litigation process way back in 1989.


Naive Ignorant Beliefs About Attorneys, Lawyers, and Judges

     At that point in time, Lon Jr. naively believed that the legal profession was an honorable profession and attorneys, lawyers, and judges had good responsible ethics standards that they were required to comply with.  He did not know that their State Bar Association's ethics standards were usually treated as "window dressing" for gullible public consumption. 

     Co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. did not know that the judicial systems in American were dominated and controlled by unfair and unethical corrupt-minded self-serving despots and tyrants.

     Why are the deplorable situations reported herein likely to continue in America?  Because the judicial systems in America have built in structural flaws that enable members of the legal professions in America to conveniently corrupt the judicial systems internally in very selfish self-serving ways. 

     Lon Jr. will show herein that those corrupting self-serving actions are effective to such an extreme extent that it is very difficult (essentially impossible) for any severely abused litigant to defend himself or herself from those types of selfish self-serving unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions, even when those abusive actions are at an outrageous level of unfair, unethical, and corrupt activity.

     The dominant controlling American citizens in the legal professions in America apparently believe it is better to allow severe unfair and unethical damage to occur to some "innocent litigant victims" than to do anything that might damage or tarnish the public image of the "legal profession" or damage or tarnish the public image of the "judicial systems in America." 

     That situation is one of the major self-serving reasons that the judicial systems in America are allowed to continue being unfair, unethical, and criminal-mindedly corrupt on a routine basis. 

     This exceptionally important report can help educate millions of responsible patriotic-minded and freedom-loving American citizens about these unfair and unethical judicial corruption situations.  It is very important for these citizens to become aware of this very serious judicial corruption. 

     After they become aware of these outrageously corrupt self-serving judicial conditions, they will likely be motivated to take responsible actions that can help prevent their involvement in potentially unfair and unethical litigation actions -  as much as possible.  Hopefully, they will also see and understand why it is very important for them to help spread the word about this Website.


Appeal Processes

     Visitors can learn herein that the appeal processes that are available in many judicial systems in America have usually been corrupted to an extreme self-serving degree.  The appeal processes can easily be used by members of the legal profession to further harass, intimidate, persecute, and punish abused litigants financially, emotionally, and health-wise due to the extreme levels of stress that can be caused by unfair, unethical, and corrupt selfish and self-serving actions by appellate court judges. 

     Visitors can also learn herein that there are no effective safeguards designed into the judicial systems (state systems or federal systems) that can cost effectively deter and prevent unfair, unethical, and corrupt selfish self-serving judicial actions from occurring with alarming levels of regular activity. 

     Why is this true?  Because there are no effective honest, ethical, and responsible investigative safe-guards built into the judicial systems in America.  The judicial systems are primarily dependent upon a very foolish system of trust - trust that members of the legal professions will always operate with a reasonable level of fairness, honesty, and integrity in all litigation and judicial actions.  This report will show some of the extremely corrupt judicial situations that occur with this "trust" system.

     Hundreds of years of human history has proven many times that human beings in  positions of authority, control, and power over other people cannot be "trusted" to be honest and fair.  In many "trust" situations, the "trusted actions" are in conflict with their own selfish self-serving objectives. 

    Lon learned that there are no effective prosecutorial type of investigations and punishments available for attorneys, lawyers, trial court judges, or appellate court judges who cause or participate in unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving judicial actions.  They are pretty much free to do whatever they want to do in any unfair, unethical, and corrupt scheme or tactic that might help them in some way.

     You will learn herein that members of the legal professions in America (the USA) can usually get away with any unfair, unethical, corrupt litigation schemes and tactics that they can devise to help them win a litigation action or case because the trial court judges that are also involved in those litigation actions or cases are usually "very cooperative" with allowing their schemes and tactics to succeed. 


Our Instructive and Educational Objectives

     This very important report is designed to be instructive to visitors and help them understand why it is very important to avoid as much as possible any activity or association with the judicial systems in America (the USA).  Their funds can be reduced by simply minimizing use of their services.

     You will learn herein that most Americans are very vulnerable to judicial system abuses that can be very harmful to them financially and emotionally and health-wise due to the potential for extreme levels of stress that can very effectively cause serious and possibly tragic health outcomes. 

     We help visitors understand that serious stress can suppress important immune system functions, and over time those conditions can result in very serious health consequences.  Think about cardiovascular disease conditions (heart attacks and strokes), cancer conditions of several kinds, arthritis, diabetes, hypoglycemia, dementia conditions, glandular problems, anxiety, depression, etc.

    As related in the first two paragraphs above, we have developed some very restrictive limitations at this Website for some potential visitors, as explained briefly in our Terms of Use department.  Those restrictions are due to the outrageously unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving manner in which some of those people conducted themselves regarding Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's (Lon Jr's) responsible valid complaints about unfair, unethical, and corrupt criminal-minded judicial actions.  Those types of judicial actions were taken against him during 20+ years of ongoing extremely malicious harassment, persecution, and punishment types of litigation and judicial actions. 

     We will show herein that those appalling and disgustingly corrupt judicial actions were taken to  harass, persecute, and punish Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (Lon Jr.) severely, as much as they could with him living in South Carolina throughout those 20+ years of related litigation actions and judicial actions. 

     You will learn herein that members of the legal profession. and state and federal law enforcement agencies, refused to take any responsible actions to evaluate Lon Jr's valid complaints about those unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded litigation and judicial actions.  Consequently, they did nothing to try to stop that ongoing persecution and punishment by corrupt and vindictive attorneys and judges.   


At Age 82, Lon Is Still Actively Exposing Unfair, Unethical Judicial Corruption 

     Lon Willoughby is determined to expose this very important information to as many responsible, freedom-loving American adults as possible.  You can help Lon spread the word about this Website and this very important department by referring some of the people in your "circle of influence" to this Website with a personal note that encourages them to be sure and review this Justice department.

     Lon learned that arrogant "elitist" unfair, unethical, corrupt-minded selfish and self-serving despots and tyrants exercise a lot of control over the legal professions and the judicial systems in America.  He also learned that "they" exercise dominant control over the law enforcement systems in America for their own self-serving advantages and benefit. 

     Lon Willoughby realizes that "they" are obviously counting on most American citizens to be too busy with their individual careers, and too preoccupied with various forms of entertainment, and too lazy, and too irresponsible to take the protective actions that Lon is recommended herein. 

     The 20+ years of judicial harassment, persecution, and punishment that "they" maliciously forced upon Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt manner shows how much they have consolidated their self-serving control and power over Americans in the past 100+ years.

     Remember that Lon Willoughby went to a lot of trouble and expense to expose those actions to appellate court judges numerous times, and appropriate law enforcement agents and agencies numerous times, but absolutely nothing was done to help terminate those extremely sadistic actions.

     If all responsible Americans who reviews this report will simple refer ten people to this Website, with that important personal note (to be sure to review this department), within one year we could have more than a million responsible freedom-loving patriotic-minded Americans who have been educated about some of our very important Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts and also educated about these exceptionally important JUDICIAL CORRUPTION ISSUES

     Within two years this very valuable Free healthcare and wellness concepts information and Justice information can spread to 20 million or more responsible patriotic-minded American citizens.  From that point in time, within another year or two, this information can be reviewed by most responsible freedom-loving patriotic-minded Americans throughout America. 

     Each responsible patriotic-minded freedom-loving visitor can help us take this viral on the Internet with their easy postings of invitations on their social media outlets to visit this Website

     Lon Willoughby says "Let's Make It Happen!!!Help us go viral with this vital information.


Uncomfortable Truth About Judicial Systems in America

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. has taken responsible actions in this department to report the uncomfortable truth about some of those corrupt "elitist" Americans and clearly expose the outrageous level of in-house corruption that appears to be routine practice in two specific professions in America. 

     We presume that there are a lot of good Americans working in both professions, but Lon knows for a fact that both professions are disgustingly irresponsible about allowing extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt criminal-minded self-serving judicial actions against selected American citizens. 

     Lon has also learned that both professions generally despise any American citizen who has sufficient honesty, integrity, and courage to make responsible attempts to expose such corruption.

     It is not our intent to injure those people health-wise.  We just aren't going to help any of them learn about some of our very special copyrighted and proprietary natural healthcare and wellness concepts.  We are not going to help those Americans become healthier, stronger, have more energy and vitality, and have better brain power, and become more effective and productive with everything they do.

    The extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt litigation and judicial situations reported in this department can also help visitors understand why we have implemented specific security evaluation standards for American citizens who may qualify as an Approved Qualified Visitor (AQV) or may qualify as a Certified Qualified Visitor (CQV) regarding the Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts education information that we present for them respectively at this Website. 

     Some of those same security evaluation standards will also be involved in the tight security evaluation standards that we will use in our leasing security requirements for our Advanced Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts Home-study Education Programs    

     Visitors can review the information reported herein about the appalling and disgusting types of unfair, unethical, and corrupt "elitist" trial court attorney actions and judicial actions that non-resident litigant Lon Willoughby, Jr. was subjected to in a distant southern state's courts (trial courts and appellate courts) during 20+ years of ongoing related malicious and ruthless harassment actions.

     This Judicial Corruption Exposed department reports that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was maliciously and ruthlessly harassed, persecuted, and punished repeatedly in an outrageously unfair, unethical, and despicable criminal-minded self-serving manner for more than 20 years by a series of trial attorneys, trial judges, and appellate court judges - in an extremely unethical and vindictive sadistic manner. 


Why did prominent "officers of the court" do that?

     We will explain herein why they wanted to punish Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. severely.  We will also show that they understood that the legal profession and the judicial systems in America are so inherently corrupted from within (from many years of extremely self-serving corrupt litigation practices) that they were confident that they could take those extremely unfair and unethical criminal-minded litigation actions against non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. and get away with it. 

     Lon will personally explain herein their self-serving outrageously unfair and unethical criminal-minded motives for wanting to harass and persecute and punish him severely in a malicious and ruthless manner.

     They did in fact get away with all of those cruel and ruthless actions in spite of Lon Willoughby's determined and diligent responsible efforts to report and expose those unfair and unethical litigation actions to appropriate authorities within the judicial systems and also within the law enforcement systems (state agencies and the FBI) - several times over a period of several years.    

     Consequently, Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (Lon Jr.) learned that the "judicial systems" in America have been severely corrupted to such an extent that they can easily be operated in an extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt self-serving manner any time "they" choose to make the "judicial systems and/or the law enforcement systems" operate that way for selected cases.

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. found that they can "operate" in an unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt self-serving manner to enable members of either "profession" (legal profession or law enforcement) to achieve their self-serving objectives, irrespective of fairness, ethics, and reasonable and responsible considerations and/or relevant published legal standards.     

    

Very Important Notice

     It is very important for all American adult visitors to this department to clearly understand that members of the "legal profession" - the "legal brotherhood" control both the judicial systems in America and the law enforcement systems in America.

     Pause and consider that members of the "legal brotherhood" effectively control the judicial systems and the law enforcement systems in each and every county within each state of the USA.  Don't ever forget this - especially when you are voting for any political office candidate. 

     We have way too many members of the "legal brotherhood" in political office positions in most states in America, and we have way too many members of the "legal brotherhood" in the U.S. Congress in Washington, D.C. (the House of Representatives and the Senate)

     It is very important to always remember that "they" can be as unfair, unethical, and corrupt in a criminal-minded self-serving manner as they want to be, and "they" will have very little danger of being investigated responsibly.  There is almost no danger of them being prosecuted for unfair, unethical, criminal-minded self-serving actions.  Why is this true in most situations?  Because such investigative and prosecutorial actions will always be controlled by members of the "legal brotherhood."  

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. learned that members of the self-appointed elitist "legal brotherhood" can easily operate the judicial systems corruptly in their own self-interest - rather than conduct litigation actions responsibly in compliance with well-established legal standards that should always be applied in a fair manner - irrespective of their own self-serving desired outcome for a litigation action.  

     Their published State Bar Association ethical standards require good responsible ethics from each member of the state's legal profession, but Lon Jr. repeatedly saw, again and again and again, that they routinely ignored those very good published professional ethics standards whenever it helped them accomplish their unfair and unethical self-serving litigation and/or judicial objectives. 

     In essence, their published Bar Association ethics standards were "window dressing" that were routinely ignored blatantly and openly, by attorneys/lawyers, and trial court judges, any time that their unfair, unethical self-serving criminal-minded litigation or adjudication actions were needed to achieve their "elitist" unfair and unethical self-serving litigation and/or judicial objectives.

     In the civil litigation involving Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (Lon Jr.) as a co-trustee of his deceased father's trust estate, the judicial systems involved  were operated in an extremely unfair, unethical, and despicably corrupt criminal-minded self-serving manner to enable the judicial systems to maliciously and ruthlessly harass, persecute, and punish Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. repeatedly.

     They had a number of motives for taking those despicable litigation and judicial actions.  It all started because Lon Jr. had conscientiously and responsibly helped his aging parents establish an excellent Trust Agreement estate management and estate settlement plan that subsequently enabled the Willoughby family to minimize federal estate taxes (to zero) and also reduce probate process fees

     Lon had previously consulted with six attorneys in the distant southern state in his very responsible diligent efforts to help his parents establish an excellent Trust Agreement estate management and settlement plan.  Unfortunately, Lon Jr. had a lot of difficulty in trying to locate an attorney in the distant state who knew how to draft a proper amendment to the Willoughby Trust Agreement documents for his parents in the proper manner - to enable their mutually agreed upon desire for managing the Willoughby trust estate and the settlement of the trust estate after Lon's father's anticipated death.

Corrupt Common-place Practice in American Courts

     Self-serving judicial corruption is apparently common-place practice in American courts.  This was  clearly demonstrated numerous times in the ongoing 20+ years of related malicious litigation actions that Lon Willoughby, Jr. (Lon) was subjected to by dishonest, unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded corrupt attorneys, operating in a very cooperative manner with a series of dishonest, unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt trial court judges, and cooperative appellant court judges, as reported herein.

     Lon also learned that self-serving judicial corruption can go all the way up to the nine justices sitting on the Supreme Court of the United States (and be conveniently ignored by them).  Lonnie Willoughby went to a lot of trouble, and a tremendous amount of preparation documentary work, and substantial expenses to submit two separate appeal cases to the high court.  Both appeal cases exposed extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions in the trial court and in the relevant appellate court. 

     In each of Lon's appeals, the individual law clerks that work for each of the nine justices of the Supreme Court presumably made a quick preliminary review of Lon's petition "book" and then made a recommendation to the respective justice that they work for (I recommend that you vote to hear this case or - recommend to not hear this case). 

     The nine justices meet periodically to vote on a number of cases - vote to hear this case (seriously review this case) or don't hear this case.  It's called the "rule of four" - if four of the nine justices vote to hear the appeal petition, the appeal will be heard.  If less than four justices vote to review the appeal petition, the case will not be heard.  In that event, the petitioner will subsequently get a mailed response from the high court that states:  Petition denied.

     In Lon's two separate appeal situations, he inquired to learn that all nine justices voted to not hear each of his appeal petitions.  Consequently, each justice voted to do nothing about the extremely corrupt judicial actions that Lon's detailed appeal petition reported with exact duplicate retyped (for appropriate sizing) documented official litigation records that clearly showed very strong preliminary evidence of Lon's legitimate complaints to the high court.

     Lon learned that the nine justices sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court can easily "allow" lower courts (trial courts and appellate courts) to get away with extremely unfair and unethical judicial actions.  The high court can simply choose to not review appeal petition complaints about outrageously unfair and corrupt self-serving judicial decisions by a state appellate court or by a federal appellate court. 

     The high court typically gets thousands of appeal cases submitted annually, but they choose to  hear only about 40 to 50 cases per year.  There are a few types of cases that they are required to hear (disputes between states, etc.) so those special cases further reduce the chances of getting a conventional appeal petition heard. 

     The potential chance of getting an appeal petition heard by the high court for most typical civil litigation cases is much less than a 1% chance (typically 0.04% or less).  Most litigants do not know this, and like petitioner Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., they do not know that for almost all civil cases and most criminal cases, the large amount of time required to prepare a complex appeal petition (in the small book format that is required), and the expenses for printing and shipping 40 copies of the appeal petition to the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC is almost always an exercise in litigation futility. 

     Consequently, it is very easy for state appellate court judges and federal appellate court judges to get away with rendering extremely unfair, unethical, and fraudulent criminal-minded judicial decisions that are favorable in a very self-serving way for the "elitist" legal brotherhood (American citizens who are members of the legal profession in some capacity - attorneys, lawyers, and judges). 

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. understands that it is very easy for unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded self-serving fraudulent appellant court judicial decisions to be made by various appellant courts (state courts and also federal courts) in numerous situations.  

     Lon Willoughby filed more than ten appeal cases and about 80% of them received unfair, unethical, self-serving appellate court decisions that were extremely damaging to Appellate Willoughby but very beneficial in a self-serving way for some members of the "legal brotherhood." 

     He was subjected to numerous appeal decision situations of that type.  He exposed very serious unfair and unethical trial court judicial corruption to appropriate appellate courts numerous times, and he was usually punished severely for having do so.

     Lon Jr. went to a lot of trouble with very detailed work that prepared complex legal briefs with documentary evidential references throughout the appeal brief - references to the "record on appeal" (official records from the trial court record, transcripts of motion hearings and trial court proceedings) to prove his argument issues. 

     Non-resident litigant Lon Willoughby, Jr. spent thousand of dollars on transcript costs for numerous motion hearings and trial court proceedings.  He also spent thousands of dollars on appeal case filing fees. and he also spent additional thousands of dollar for the clerk of court fees for preparation of the "record on appeal" by the deputy clerks . 

     Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. filed more than ten responsible appeals, and he personally drafted, submitted, and prosecuted his respective responsible appeal claims during the 20+ years litigation process.  Most of his multiple appeals complaint issues were subsequently affirmed, per curium by a three judge panel who chose to not provide a written legal opinion for most of his appeals. 

     They simply approved the unfair, unethical, and corrupt trial court litigation actions and the judicial adjudication actions that Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had complained about in each of his appeals.  It is important to understand that each of Lon's "lost appeal cases" always provided some self-serving unfair and unethical benefits to members of the legal profession (the legal brotherhood). 


Lon's Complaints To The U.S. Supreme Court 

   The state's appellate court judges routinely took no judicial actions that could help stop such unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions in the trial courts below.

     Lon also went to a lot of trouble and did hundreds of hours of legal work over a period of years, at substantial expense, to report some of those judicial actions to the U.S. Supreme Court in two separate appeals - Petition for a Writ of Certiorari that he filed with the high court in Washington, D.C. 

     As stated previously, the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court each voted to take no judicial actions that might have helped correct the very serious judicial harm that had been done to litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. with malicious and ruthless litigation schemes and tactics that demonstrated extremely unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded sadistic corrupt judicial actions. 

     Those unfair and unethical "judicial actions" had been taken against litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in an elitist manner by "officers of the courts" below.  Those were self-serving unfair and unethical criminal-minded attorneys and "very cooperative and helpful" self-serving unfair and unethical criminal-minded judges - a trial court judge and then the appellate court's three-judge appellate panel.

     Each of Lon's two separate appeal briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court reported how he had been maliciously and ruthlessly harassed and persecuted by an unfair and unethical criminal-minded attorney and a "cooperative and helpful" unfair, unethical, criminal-minded trial court judge and those judicial actions were then further compounded by "cooperative" appellate court judges who refused to overturn those obviously unfair and unethical criminal-minded corrupt trial court judicial actions. 

     NOTE: It is important to understand that all of the unfair and unethical criminal-minded attorneys and judges involved in the actions reported herein were "officers" of the respective courts involved. 

     Lonnie Willoughby had to accomplish a very large amount of legal research work and legal brief writing work to draft, and word process, and publish his detailed legal brief for each high court appeal case. (The two appeal petitions were filed several years apart.)

     The special appeal procedures for the high court required  each petitioner to publish their appeal legal brief, a "Petition for Writ of Certiorari", in book format with bound covers similar to other paperback books, with pages printed on both sides of the paper (just like a regular small book).  

     The special appeal procedures also required that petitioner Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. ship the high court 40 copies of his published "book style" legal brief petition (for each one of his appeal cases). 

     Lon Jr. had substantial expenses and a lot of lost regular work time while he spent hundreds of hours developing his report to the high court about the "unfair, unethical and outrageously corrupt judicial actions" that had been taken against him in the trial court that were subsequently "approved" by the state's appellate court (below the high court).  Petitioner Lon Jr. had to do all of that detailed laborious work for each of his two separate appeal petitions to the U. S. Supreme Court.

     The appeal petition brief (a small size book) had to contain exhibit documents from official court records in the trial court and from the appeal case below, but no photo copies of any evidential documents were allowed - due to the small published book format that was required for Lon's "petition" to the high court (pages about 6.5 inches wide and 9 inches high).  Consequently, all evidential documents (court orders, court record documents, many transcript pages, etc.) had to be retyped completely with a specified font size, word for word.  All exhibit documents had to fit into the small book format that was required (much smaller than 8 1/2 inch by 11 inch copy paper). 

     NOTE:  That small book format requirement is an idiotic and stupid government requirement.  Consider that the high court typically receives many thousands of appeal petitions per year, and 40 copies of each appeal petition is required to be submitted in this unreasonable small book size format that totally prevents making any photocopies of any evidential documents for said "book."  Everything in the Petition has to be presented in the 6.5 inch by 9 inch small book format.

      Lon Willoughby's appeal petition very responsibly reported to the nine justices of the high court in some detail the extremely unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded corrupt judicial actions those situations occurred in the two lower courts (judicial actions in the trial court and then actions in the appellate court that subsequently "approved" the disputed trial court actions). 

    As it turned out for each of Lon's two appeal cases (submitted several years apart), all of those tedious preparatory work actions were a total waste of Lon's time - all of his diligent hundreds of hours of laborious work efforts, and the substantial expenses involved with printing and shipping 40 copies of each appeal petition to the high court in Washington, D.C. There are very important time limits for filing an appeal petition.

     Lon learned that submitting an important appeal petition to the high court is almost always an exercise in judicial futility - almost all appeal petitions to the high court are denied.  Remember, they only choose to "hear" about 40 to 50 appeal petition cases per year.  Almost all of the many thousands of case that are submitted to them each year are not heard.  Those petitioners will eventually receive a letter in the mail from the high court, on the court's letterhead stationary, that simply states:  Petition denied. 

    The responsive order that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. finally received from the high court regarding each  appeal petition was like that:  Petition denied.  That was it, nothing more.  After all of that laborious preparatory work and substantial expense - just those two very disappointing words. 

     So you now know how the system works for appeal petitions to the high court.  Lon Willoughby recommends that you forget about it, don't attempt it, because your chances of being heard is almost 0% unless you have a very important novel type case that has not been heard before by the high court. In that situation, your case may be heard if it will allow the court to set a very important precedent - such as a few of the unique appeal decisions that you may have heard about on the national news. 


First Appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court

     Lon's first appeal to the high court was about a state court civil case that had gone through the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt elitist trial court, and had then gone through the unfair, unethical, and corrupt elitist state appellate court (all were actions in a distant southern state). 


Second Appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court

      Lon's second appeal to the high court occurred several years later, after a related civil case had gone through the unfair, unethical and corrupt self-serving elitist federal trial court and had then gone through the very unfair, and unethical, and extremely self-serving corrupt elitist federal appellate court. If you could review all of the unfair, unethical litigation schemes and tactics that were used by several attorneys to cause plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose that trial court case, you would likely be appalled, dismayed, and angered that such tactics could be successful with a federal court judge.


Our "Justice" Department At Another Website    

     Our ABC of Health dot biz Website contains a Justice department that presents Lon Willoughby's "short story" (15 pages) that reports some of the appalling and disgustingly unfair and corrupt judicial situations that he experienced over 20+ years of ongoing litigation actions involving several state trial court judges and state appellate court judges in a distant southern state's elitist judicial system

     All visitors to this Website are authorized to visit that Website and review Lon's report about those extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions and resultant judicial actions.

     Lon Willoughby was a non-resident litigant in the distant state's litigation actions, and he was consistently treated like a foreigner (from another country) although he is a natural-born American citizen, and a 4-years military veteran, and he had served an additional 19 years as a federal government employee with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  (23 years of federal service) 

     Lon gradually learned that the "elitist-minded" attorneys and judges in the distant state had no respect for his natural-born citizenship, and no respect for his responsible military or government service, and no respect for his protected civil rights pursuant to the Constitution of the United States, and no respect for his protected civil rights pursuant to the State Constitution of that distant state. 

     He gradually learned that those elitist-minded despots and tyrants thought that they could do no wrong and they apparently thought that non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could do no right.  They were consistently unfair and unethical criminal-minded elitist despots and tyrants who obviously believed that they could do anything they wanted to do in the litigation process and get away it - any of their "elitist" selfish self-serving unfair and unethical criminal-minded litigation schemes and tactics. 

     Lon quickly learned that "local" trial attorneys and "local" trial judges generally know each other well and work together closely in case after case - for years in many situations.  In general they can conspiratorially decide ahead of trial how they "agree" for the trial court litigation to turn out, and they can then be as dishonest, devious, scheming, unethical, and ruthlessly corrupt as necessary to make the case outcome come out the way they had already decided that it "should" turn out. 

     In defendant Co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby Jr's initial trial court litigation in September 1989, the two opposing attorneys and the trial court judge apparently collusively manipulated the case to make it come out the way they wanted it to come out, in direct conflict with the controlling legal standards that were relevant, and in conflict with the factual evidence that was disclosed during Lon's several hours of testimony at trial, and in conflict with the legal system's relevant ethics standards that the attorneys and the judge were supposed to honor and comply with (but violated severely in several ways).

     In some litigation cases, like Lon's initial civil "equity court" case in September 1989, the trial is just an amusing and entertaining "show" for the two opposing attorneys (plaintiff's attorney and the defendant's "defense attorney") and the trial court judge - with them being the three self-serving dishonest elitist actors in the "litigation show" (for their own amusement and entertainment).  It is important to understand that the opposing attorneys are usually paid handsomely for their acting performance in the "litigation show" and the trial court judge also gets paid well for his participation.

     A few years later, Lon Willoughby, was litigating pro-se (litigating without assistance of legal counsel) in that same distant state's trial court in an effort to responsibly prosecute a very important civil complaint about an extremely dishonest, deceitful, and outrageously corrupt trial court "defense attorney" that had willfully betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's confidence and trust during the "equity court trial in September 1989.  He had knowingly and willfully allowed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to be "ambushed at trial" with five surprise complaint issues that had not been noticed in the plaintiff's pleadings (the Complaint against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr). 

     For simplicity of identification, we will sometimes identify that "defense attorney" with the acronym FDA (former defense attorney).

     NOTE:  Lon had subsequently learned that the relevant legal standards established by that state's Supreme Court specified that the plaintiff's pleadings must identify all of the issues to be tried during trial, and no surprise issues (ambush issues) are allowed to be brought in during trial - unless both parties mutually agreed to adjudicate the new complaint issue(s).

     The "defense attorney's" betrayal of his client's very important litigation interests occurred in September 1989 in a civil lawsuit that was supposed to resolve a family member dispute about monthly distributions of trust income to three beneficiaries of the Willoughby family trust estate. 

     The defense attorney's "betrayal actions" of co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. were extreme legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud to an outrageous level - especially so for a very intelligent and prominent attorney with about twenty-two years of attorney experience in that state's court system. 

     The two opposing attorneys involved in the one-day "equity court" trial (jury not allowed), and the circuit court judge that conducted the non-jury "equity court" trial in September 1989, were extremely dishonest elitist "officers of the court" and the three of them deliberately made a sadistic catastrophic mess out of a rather simple family member dispute about monthly distributions of income from the trust estate to three primary beneficiaries of the trust estate's substantial assets.

     The three "officers of the court" took those extremely unfair, dishonest, and outrageously corrupt judicial actions due to their criminal-minded collusive "elitist objectives" of maliciously and ruthlessly persecuting and punishing defendant co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. in an extremely severe manner

     Why would two prominent local attorneys and a local circuit court judge collusively scheme to unfairly and corruptly punish severely an out-of-state defendant co-trustee in a malicious and ruthless manner about a relatively simple family member dispute about distribution amounts of monthly income from a family Trust Estate for a "local area" beneficiary? (She lived in the county where the court was located.)  In order to understand these situations, we need to review some background information.


Background Information About Relevant Trust Agreement Documents

     In the spring of 1982, Lon Willoughby, Jr. had helped his aging parents try to establish an excellent estate management and estate settlement trust plan, using the services of an experienced estate planning attorney that was recommended by the trust department of a major bank (in the distant state). 

     The recommended estate planning attorney subsequently drafted a pair of mirror image Trust Agreements for Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's parent's jointly-owned estate.  Those two Trust Agreements (near identical Trust Agreements) for Mr. and Mrs. Lonnie Willoughby Sr. were initially developed and prepared by the recommended estate planning attorney (in that same distant state). 

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. lived in South Carolina and he communicated with said attorney by telephone during the developmental stages of the drafting of the two trust agreements (one for each parent).

     Unfortunately, the estate planning attorney did not complete the estate planning work in a fully competent manner, and Lon was knowledgeable enough about the estate planning issues involved to subsequently recognize a very serious deficiency.  Lon later realized that additional legal actions were needed to amend both trust agreements to establish and clarify some very important legal issues

     At that point in time, he had lost confidence in the attorney's estate planning skill level and in his honesty and integrity.   Consequently, Lon consulted with other attorneys in that state about those issues.  Initially, this was a very awkward situation for Lon Jr. because he was about 500 miles away from the distant state.

     However, Lon and his wife Janie moved to that state in July 1983, to take over and manage his parent's business due to Lon's father's paralyzed condition and his very poor general health condition.  That situation made it much more convenient for Lon to consult with some local area attorneys (in that state) about amending his parent's individual Trust Agreements to correct their deficient condition.

      Over a period of several months, Lon Jr. was not able to find an attorney in that state that was knowledgeable enough to help Lon Jr. get his parent's respective Trust Agreements amended.

     NOTE:  It is important for visitors to understand that estate planning is a rare specialty in legal practice, and most trial attorneys know practically nothing about complex estate planning actions. 

     After consulting with five additional attorneys during those months, Lon had run out of time for finding an attorney who could help his parents amend their Trust Agreements appropriately.  Time was very important in this matter because Lon's father was in very bad health

     Mr. Lonnie Willoughby, Sr. had already had multiple heart attacks and a very bad stroke (that had left him paralyzed totally on the left side of his body - from his left shoulder to the toes on his left foot).  He could not even turn himself in bed.  He also had a pacemaker installed in his chest area to help regulate his heart beats. 

     Lonnie Jr. realized that his father was subject to die at any time, and the Trust Agreement amendment actions needed to be drafted and completed while Lon's father was healthy enough mentally to make important decisions about how he wanted his trust estate management to work currently and after he died. 

     Lon realized that the Trust Agreement's amending document would require his father's notarized signature to make the amendment effective.  The amendment document was necessary to enable his two co-trustees (his two grown sons) to take appropriate desired administrative actions currently and also after their father died. 

     Lon Jr. understood his father's personal opinions and desires about those important estate planning issues because Lon had discussed those issues with each parent individually and had then discussed those same issues with both parents together.

     Because he had been unable to locate an adequately skilled estate planning attorney in the distant state, Lon Jr. reluctantly decided to purchase some estate planning legal books and try to learn how to personally draft the needed amendment document for each of his parent's Trust Agreement

     Fortunately, Lon Jr. was able to accomplish those objectives; he learned how to draft the two legal documents that would amend each of the two Trust Agreements appropriately so the trusts could work to achieve the management objectives that his parents desired for their jointly-owned estate value.  

     Lon and Janie worked very hard for about 18 months to get his parent's business in much better condition, and they got the business sold in January 1985 so Lon's parents could finally retire. 

     Lon's personal efforts to amend the two Trust Agreements were completed on December 12, 1985 and by March 1986, Lon and Janie had moved back to their home in South Carolina. 

     Lon's efforts to amend the two Trust Agreements were very successful.  His father's Amended Trust Agreement worked perfectly when Mr. Lonnie Willoughby, Sr. died on November 22, 1986.  The excellent "Amended Trust Agreement" enabled the Willoughby family to subsequently avoid having to pay federal estate taxes of about $225,000 on Lonnie Willoughby Sr's taxable estate value. 

     The Amended Trust Agreement also enabled the Willoughby family to avoid probate legal expenses of about $50,000+ on the deceased Mr. Willoughby's estate value.  Due to the estate planning work that Lon Jr. had accomplished, the probate court process to settle the estate was completed within 24 hours rather than taking several months or more as is common for probate completion. 

     In essence, Mr. Willoughby Sr's Amended Trust Agreement enabled the two co-trustees to accomplish those estate settlement actions quickly and at minimum expenses for both the probate settlement judicial process and the federal estate tax issue. 

     More than two years later, in February 1989, one of the three primary beneficiaries of the trust estate (living in the distant state) sued co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby Jr. because he would not agree to pay the beneficiary as much monthly income from the trust estate as she started demanding. 

     Lon Jr. knew that the amount of income that she was demanding was excessive for her rightful share of the trust income, and Lon Jr. also knew that the amount was in excess of her financial needs.  Lon Jr. knew that she had more than $200,000 cash in her bank accounts, and her home and her car, a like new 98 Oldsmobile, were both paid for.  Lon Jr. also understood that she had no unusual monthly expenses.  She clearly did not need the excessive amount of trust income monthly that she demanded.

    She discussed that monthly payment dispute issue with a local attorney in the distant state, and he recommended that she allow him to file a lawsuit against co-trustee Lon Jr.  He anticipated that the pressure of her lawsuit (in a distant state) would force Lon Jr. (living about 500 miles away in South Carolina) to give in to her demands and agree to pay her the monthly trust income that she wanted. 

     That unfair and unreasonable plan did not work because Lon Jr. was a very competent co-trustee, and he knew that he was being fair and reasonable about the amount of monthly income that the beneficiary should be receiving monthly for the trust income distribution to her. 

     Co-trustee Lon Jr. was knowledgeable about the beneficiary's financial circumstances, and he was confident that the beneficiary did not actually need additional monthly income from the Willoughby trust estate's limited income.  Consequently, the case went to trial with the female beneficiary in the distant state as the plaintiff and co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby Jr. (Lon Jr.) was the defendant.

     The circuit court's "equity court bench trial" (no jury) occurred in September 1989 and it lasted one full day.  Lon Willoughby, Jr. was on the witness stand giving testimony for hours that day - answering questions posed by the plaintiff's attorney and then answering questions posed by co-trustee Lonnie Jr's highly skilled "defense attorney."  Both attorneys lived in that area and they knew each other well.

     The "defense attorney" was a very smart and very capable trial attorney with about twenty-two years experience as a trial attorney in that state's judicial system.  co-trustee Lon Jr. knew that he had been a very competent co-trustee, and he was confident that his very capable defense attorney would show that the two complaints filed against him in the plaintiff's Complaint were unreasonable and invalid.

     The two volume 267 page trial transcript that was prepared after the trial (at Lon Willoughby's request and expense) cost him $1350.  The transcript reported the trial activities in word-for-word detail.  The transcript showed convincingly that the trial court judge and the two opposing attorneys (three "officers of the court") had no competent understanding of the inter vivos type Amended Trust Agreement (for the deceased Lonnie Willoughby, Sr.) that was involved in the litigation process.

     NOTE:  Most trial attorneys know little to nothing about complex estate planning issues because estate planning is a specialty area of law - most trial attorneys and most trial court judges have not been educated about this special subject (estate planning).

     The transcript also showed convincingly that those three "officers of the court" were incompetent to try to litigate the complex trust estate issues that the plaintiff's attorney deliberately injected into the trial as surprise "ambush complaints" against co-trustee Lonnie  Willoughby, Jr. - Five complex complaint issues that were not noticed in the Complaint filed against co-trustee Lonnie Jr.

      Defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was therefore not provided with a fair and reasonable opportunity to prepare his defensive arguments about complex estate planning issues and federal estate taxation issues that the co-trustee had considered way back in 1985 when he was involved in getting the Trust Agreement amendment drafted (almost four years prior to the day of trial in September 1989).  There was no reason for defendant co-trustee Lon Jr. to believe that those old complex trust estate planning issues would be raised during the trial.  Consequently,  Lon Jr. had not reviewed those old complex estate planning issues prior to the trial in September 1989

     Co-trustee Lon Jr. did not get noticed that those old issues would be involved in the trial, and he went to court unprepared to defend himself competently about complex trust development and federal estate taxation issues that he had carefully considered one time about four years prior to the trial. 

     The plaintiff's attorney deliberately ambushed co-trustee Lon, Jr. during trial with complex estate planning issues that were not noticed (identified) as being relevant in the plaintiff's pleadings (the Complaint against co-trustee Lon Jr.).  The plaintiff's attorney did not raise those issues at any time during discovery actions prior to trial.

     During the trial, the plaintiff's attorney brought in a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) to give testimony about the trust estates surprise complaint issues and that situation proved that this was a planned ambush complaints scheme.  It is important to understand that the CPA was specifically not admitted as an expert witness regarding the surprise trust estate issues and federal taxation issues that were introduced during trial as surprise complaints against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (Lon Jr.).  The fact that the CPA was not admitted as an expert witness means that his testimony about those issues was conjectural layman opinion which should have had no bearing or relevance on the trial judge's adjudication about those complex issues.

     As it turned out, the CPA's witness testimony showed that he was not competent to give testimony about those surprise (ambush complaints) complex trust estate issues.  Like most CPA's, he knew almost nothing about the technicalities involved with the complex estate planning "surprise complaint issues" that the plaintiff's attorney raised against co-trustee Lon Jr. for the first time after the trial was in progress.  The CPA repeatedly couched his testimony responses to questions from the plaintiff's attorney about the surprise complaints estate planning issues with "I think so." 

     In other words, the CPA did not know for sure anything about the complex trust issues; he was essentially guessing.  His erroneous guessing answers helped the plaintiff's attorney build a case for mis-management against defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     Fortunately, co-trustee Lon, Jr. was still sufficiently knowledgeable about those estate planning issues to recognize that the CPA's responses were usually wrong information.  He had no competent knowledge about the estate planning issues involved with the relevant Amended Trust Agreement.   

     Even though Lon Jr. had not been given adequate notice to review the technicalities involved with the complex trust administration issues and the federal estate taxation issues that were raised as ambush issues - co-trustee Lon Jr. was able to remember important relevant information about each of those issues.  He was able to give responsible direct answers to the questions posed to him by the plaintiff's attorney (as ambush complaint issues) although there were two technical terms that he did not recall when he wanted to use those technical terms in his testimony responses.  He had not used those terms for about four years and they just did not come up in his memory when he needed them.

     When co-trustee Lon Jr. was later questioned about some of those issues by his own defense attorney, defendant Lon Jr. was also able to explain confidently that the CPA's answers to those surprise complaint questions were not correct.  Defendant Lon Jr. testified that the CPA was not a competent witness about those complex trust estate planning issues.


The Final Judgment for the Equity Court Case

That was Heard in the Distant State In September 1989

      When the Final Judgment was rendered several weeks later, the judge had "chosen" to believe the CPA's shifty incompetent non-expert testimony and to disbelieve co-trustee Lon Jr's confident knowledgeable testimony about the five surprise complaints issues (ambush complaints) about complex trust development and federal estate taxation issues.  

     The Final Judgment ruled in co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's favor on the two original complaint issues that were noticed properly in the plaintiff's pleadings (the Complaint), but the judge also ruled against co-trustee Lonnie Jr. on three of the five surprise complaint issues.  The unfair and unethical judge used those improper rulings to willfully cause co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose the case. 

     Lon Jr's defense attorney's unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded legal malpractice collusive scheme to effectively "cooperate" with the plaintiff's local attorney's ambush scheme actually allowed and enabled the plaintiff's attorney to ruthlessly ambush co-trustee Lonnie Jr. during trial with five surprise complaint issues that the "cooperative" judge could then use to rule against defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     NOTE:  All the "defense attorney" had to do to stop that ambush scheme was to say:  Your Honor, we object to these surprise complaint issues being introduced during this trial.  Those complaint issues were not noticed in the plaintiff's pleadings; consequently, we did not conduct discovery about these new complaint issues.  It is a clear denial of fundamental due process of law standards to ambush the defendant during trial with complex surprise complaint issues.  It is clear that the plaintiff's ambush scheme has denied the defendant a reasonable amount of time to prepare his defensive argument statements about these new surprise complaint issues.

     If the "cooperative" trial court judge had unfairly, unethically, and corruptly overruled that detailed responsible objection, co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would have a very strong argument on appeal to reverse the judge's improper action of "denying/overruling that competent objection."

     Think about this situation for a few moments: a very smart and very skilled trial attorney with about 22 years of trial court type experience in that state's courts, and he pretended that he did not know how to object properly to surprise complaints being raised against his client for the first time after the trial was in progress.  Absurd!!!  Ridiculous!!!  That was a planned betrayal of a very responsible client - a very competent family member co-trustee appointed by his now deceased father to that position.

     During the one-day trial, co-trustee Lonnie Jr. realized that the opposing attorneys and the trial court judge were technically incompetent to attempt to evaluate the complex surprise complaint trust issues.  As the trial continued that day, co-trustee Lon Jr. could see rather clearly that none of the three "officers of the court" had any technical competency with those complex trust estate planning issues. 

     However, the Final Judgment that was rendered weeks later showed that the plaintiff's attorney's "surprise complaints ambush scheme" had worked; it gave the very "cooperative" trial court judge the apparent basis that he wanted (needed) to rule against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  

     The Final Judgment even fraudulently claimed that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was incompetent regarding his knowledge about the "surprise complaint issues." He was removed as a co-trustee of his deceased father's trust estate - even though he had been selected by his own father and had served faithfully and very responsibly from January 1983 to September 1989 - almost six years.

     The local CPA who came to trial as a witness for the plaintiff and gave incompetent testimony about the surprise (ambush) complaint issues raised for the first time after the trial was in progress was then selected by the trial court judge to become the successor sole trustee for the Willoughby Trust Estate.  This situation illustrates how outrageously unfair, unethical, and corrupt the trial court judge was.

     The fact that Lon, Jr's very competent actions had enabled the trust estate to legally avoid paying about $225,000 in federal estate taxes was totally ignored by the three "officers of the court."  They also conveniently ignored the fact that Lon Jr's very competent estate planning actions had also reduced the probate process fees to less than $400.00 when they typically could have been $50,000 or more.  They also ignored the fact that the probate court's processing of the final estate settlement request took only 24 hours to get a ruling from the probate judge to complete the probate process. 

     Lon Jr's estate planning actions worked exceptionally well, but his defense attorney, and the plaintiff's attorney, and the trial court's "circuit court judge" conveniently ignored all of those remarkable estate planning successes. 

     The three of them "agreed" to label co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. as incompetent in the Final Judgment that the plaintiff's attorney personally drafted for the judge's signature.  Lon Jr's defense attorney had an opportunity to object to the wording of the Final Judgment, but he obviously agreed to allow that fraudulent very damaging information to remain in said judgment. 

     We have explained this situation in some detail to carefully illustrate to all visitors how disgustingly  unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt that criminal-minded litigation scheme was conducted by two highly skilled opposing trial attorneys and a skilled circuit court judge.

     It eventually became clear to Lon Willoughby, Jr. that those three "officers of the court" were determined to maliciously and ruthlessly punish him for having gotten personally involved in getting the Trust Agreements drafted and formally implemented for his aging parents, and also because he had  subsequently gotten involved personally in the drafting and formal implementation of the amendment document for his father's Trust Agreement. 

     The three "officers of the court" apparently felt that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had invaded "their local county legal territory" by personally drafting the amendment document, getting it signed (by his father) and notarized properly, and then filing the original Amended Trust Agreement document in  the local circuit court record system - just as a competent attorney would have needed to do to help ensure that the amendment document would be effective in amending the original Trust Agreement. 

     The error in their thinking processes about those issues is this:  The Willoughby Trust Agreement was not in "their local county legal territory" - it was in the Willoughby family's local county territory.  The Willoughby family co-trustee Lonnie Jr. had authority to take whatever actions were needed to get the Trust Agreement amended to enable the Amended Trust Agreement to be administered in the way that both parents agreed that they wanted the trust estate to be managed currently, and after Mr. Lonnie Willoughby Sr's anticipated pending death (he was in very poor health). 

     This situation clearly exposes the "elitist" attitude of the three "officers of the court."  Even though each of the three "officers of the court" were incompetent to try to litigate or adjudicate the complex "surprise complaint issues" raised against co-trustee Lonnie Jr. during the trial, they apparently believed that they were right about those issues by virtue of their "elitist" positions as "officers of the court."  They wanted to believe that co-trustee Lonnie Jr. was wrong about those issues.   They cared  nothing about the facts available in the case - fair and impartial justice was of no interest to them. 

     Like typical unfair, unethical, criminal-minded "elitist" despots and tyrants, who always believe that they are right, Lon Jr. therefore had to be wrong (incompetent). The emperor can do no wrong because he is the "elitist" emperor - that was apparently their "elitist" attitude about those trust estate issues - even though all three of them were technically illiterate and incompetent about those complex issues. This is the way the human mind typically works for people with an "elitist" mentality.  They cannot be wrong so the opposing party must therefore be wrong when disagreeing with them.

     The detailed report above clearly illustrates how dangerous and treacherous it can be for a non-resident defendant to have to litigate in a distant state's judicial system.  Local trial attorneys and a local trial court judge can be as dishonest, as unfair, as unethical, and as criminal-minded corrupt as they need to be to develop an apparent "reason" for making a case come out the way they mutually agreed to make the Final Judgment come out (the way they wanted it to come out).

     We have shown that they can each be deceitful and unethical in order to manipulate the case to their own "elitist" objectives.  The next paragraph will further confirm that this is how outrageously unfair and corrupt civil or criminal litigation can be (probably in any trial court anywhere in the USA). 

     The initial trial court's circuit court judge (in 1989), and then a series of successive  circuit court trial judges, and also two county court judges, over a period of many years, conducted the ongoing related litigation actions in an extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt "elitist manner" to  ensure that non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would consistently lose in every litigation instance of that very important  litigation process (20+ years of maliciously and ruthlessly extended litigation actions). 

     That situation is also further shown by the fact that litigant Lon Willoughby had a constitutionally protected right to a jury trial in his counterclaim action to prosecute his "defense attorney" for legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud and his pleading properly demanded a jury trial (protected right by that state's Constitution).  However, a successive series of two circuit court judges deceitfully and unethically denied counterclaim plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. any opportunity to present his complaint actions before a jury (of his peers). 

     Lon Jr. was ruthlessly denied that right by a series of unfair and unethical collusive litigation schemes and tactics initiated by the corrupt "defense attorney" defendant and two successive "very cooperative" unfair and unethical "local" circuit court judges. 

     The "local" attorney defendant and the two successive "local" circuit court judges apparently recognized that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was capable of presenting his own case pro se in a jury trial, and he would almost certainly win his case if that jury trial was allowed to occur (as required by the State's Constitution). 

     Their successive unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial actions to prevent that jury trial showed clearly that they were determined to not allow Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. any opportunity to have that jury trial and likely win a very important legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud case against a very prominent "local" trial court attorney with more than 22 years of litigation experience. 

     The second circuit court judge appeared in the litigation process because the first circuit court judge assigned to the case was forced to recuse himself by defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's competent and timely demand that the judge recuse himself from the case due to his unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial actions that tried to prevent defendant Lonnie Willoughby from prosecuting pro se his valid counterclaim action against the corrupt "defendant attorney" that had betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during the equity court bench trial conducted in September 1989.

     The extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt "defense attorney" had filed a "Summary Judgement" motion in the case in an effort to get defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's counterclaim pleading against the attorney and his law firm dismissed - on the basis that the statute of limitations had run out before Lon Jr. had filed his counterclaim pleadings

     NOTE:  A Summary Judgement motion hearing attempts to show that there is no valid reason for that claim to be allowed to go forward and be adjudicated in a trial procedure.  The filer of said motion attempts to show that there is some valid reason for the judge to not allow the claim or counterclaim to go forward into a more complex litigation process such as a typical trial.  The motion proposes that a separate portion of the litigation process can be decided in said motion hearing with a ruling on that issue(s) by the judge.

     Lon Jr. traveled the 500 miles to the distant state's judicial chamber's Summary Judgment hearing, and he was well prepared to present his argument issues that showed that the statute of limitations had not run out prior to his filing of his counterclaim action.

     During the Summary Judgment hearing, defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. presented photocopies to the circuit court judge of three relevant on-point appellate court decisions (in that state) showing that the statute of limitations had not run out because defendant Lonnie Willoughby's first appeal had been in progress for quite a while before the appeal decision had been finalized.  That situation prevented the statute of limitation time period from beginning to run - until that appeal was finalized.

     The plaintiff's attorney and the trial court judge both knew about that situation of course, but if counterclaim plaintiff Lon Jr. did not properly defend himself on that issue during the Summary Judgment hearing, the plaintiff would automatically win their improper claim when the trial court judge dismissed Lon Jr's counterclaim pleadings.

     Lon Willoughby traveled back to his home in South Carolina after that hearing knowing that he had solidly defeated the law firm's motion for Summary Judgment.  However, when he subsequently received the circuit court judge's ruling on that matter by mail, the circuit court judge had approved the motion for Summary Judgment and had thereby dismissed plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's counterclaim action against the local law firm and their "defendant attorney."  (the FDA)

     It is important for visitors to understand that the unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial ruling was drafted by the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the corrupt "defense attorney" who had deceitfully allowed the plaintiff's attorney to ambush co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during trial in September 1889 with five ambush complaint issues). 

     Visitors also need to understand that this is the normal and usual procedure in that state; the winning attorney normally has the assigned duty of drafting the judicial ruling order for the trial judge's signature.   Said attorney can word the document the way they want it worded; the "cooperative" judge will likely go along with their wording.

     The very important significance here is to show that both the attorney and the circuit court judge had unfairly, unethically, and corruptly ignored the three appellate court case rulings that defendant Lon Jr. had presented to the judge (photocopies) showing that in these circumstances, where a related appeal case is in progress for a period of time, the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the appeal case had been completed. 

     Defendant Lon Jr. only needed to present one of those relevant appeal court rulings to responsibly defend himself in that Summary Court judicial hearing, but he had presented three relevant appeal court rulings (from appeal courts in that state), and each of those appellate court cases solidly supported his counterclaim pleadings filing time - as being well within the statute of limitations for filing said counterclaim pleading. 

     Those pleading presented a very important case of legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud against the plaintiff law firm and it's attorney, the FDA, amounting to about 600 thousand dollars in damages to counterclaim plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     The plaintiff law firm's attorney and the circuit court judge had no valid authority to disregard the controlling appeal case rulings that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. presented during the Summary Judgment hearing.  Both of them were ethically duty bound to comply with those controlling appellate court on-point rulings.  However, Lon Willoughby, Jr. has shown herein that they totally ignored those controlling decisions. 

     Those were criminal actions by the plaintiff's attorney and the trial court judge, pursuant to a state criminal-law statute, but Lon Willoughby, Jr. did not know about that criminal-law statute at that time.  His ongoing legal research discovered that statute many months later, and he was confident that the attorney and the judge knew that they were violating that statutory law with their deceitful and fraudulent actions. 

     Non-resident counterclaim plaintiff Lon Willoughby, Jr., from South Carolina, was forced to file another appeal case that would be very time consuming and expensive and a lot of trouble for him.  He did not have convenient access to a law library in that state to conduct his legal research about the appeal issues.  This situation illustrates how disgustingly dishonest and unethical trial attorneys and circuit court judges can be. 

     They both knew that defendant Lon Jr. has won the Summary Judgement hearing, but they both fraudulently participated in issuing an extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial order that officially claimed that the plaintiff law firm had won the Summary Judgment decision that they requested about Lon Jr's counterclaim. 

     That circuit court judge had previously been a state prosecutor for many years.  This situation shows that state prosecutors and state judges will lie about anything and falsify official litigation records to make litigation actions come out the way they want them to come out - in an "elitist" self-serving manner.

     Lon Jr. had to do a lot of study and legal work to file a timely motion that demanded that the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt circuit court judge recuse himself from the case (voluntarily withdraw from any further proceedings in the case) based upon state statutory law that was written for such corrupt judicial actions.

     In addition to that recusal action, defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. also had to timely file his Notice of Appeal and pay the filing fees involved for the local circuit court and also the appellate court and then begin the complex process of selecting the "Record on Appeal" documents that would be compiled by the clerk of court's office.  Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. then had to begin developing his appeal's "Initial Brief." 

    +  +  +  +

     Important Note:  Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. did eventually win that appeal case in the Appellant Court for that district of the state.  The Appeal where the circuit court judge had ignored the three appellate court case law decisions showing that the statute of limitations had not expired when defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. filed his counterclaim action against the plaintiff law firm and it's attorney (FDA).  However, that appeal win did not occur until many months later. 

     Defendant Lon Jr's counterclaim had to be reinstated at that time.  We will show below that numerous unfair, unethical, and fraudulent judicial actions occurred in the meantime - while Lon Jr. was waiting for that very important appeal decision to occur. 

     It is also very important to learn that absolutely nothing was done to punish the extremely corrupt attorney and circuit court judge for their collusive criminal-minded unfair, unethical, and fraudulent Summary Judgment decision that forced non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. to have to file and then present that appeal case action. 

     You see, that is how the disgustingly corrupt judicial system works.  Attorneys or lawyers and "cooperative" trial court judges can deliberately cause unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions that severely persecute and punish a litigant victim in a ruthless and malicious manner that causes him or her a lot of additional expense and work, and nothing at all will be done to those corrupt "officers of the court" - absolutely nothing!!!

     They know that they can be as unfair, unethical, and as corrupt in a litigation process as they want to be for their self-serving purposes, and if they do get caught by an honest responsible opponent, nothing at all will be done in the form of penalty or punishment. 

     It is an extremely unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt judicial system, and you now know why - the "elitist" judicial system allows and effectively encourages attorneys, lawyers, and judges to be dishonest, unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt and make a terrible mess out of litigation processes as a form of sadistic amusement. 


+  +  +  + +

     A successor circuit court judge had been appointed to continue the circuit court litigation process after defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had successfully filed his motion to recuse the presiding circuit court judge. 

     The same statutory state law that enabled an abused litigant to file a motion for recusal of an unfair, unethical, and corrupt judge also enabled that litigant to file motions with the successor judge to review and rehear relevant orders that had been issued by the now recused judge that were harmful to the abused litigant.  Consequently, defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. filed five motions that requested the successor circuit court judge review and suspend five orders that issued by the now recused circuit court judge that had been improperly harmful to defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr.

     The successor judge summarily denied all of defendant Willoughby's motion for review of those five orders, indicating vaguely that he could not review those orders.  His actions in that regard had obviously ignored the statutory law that defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's five motions had cited, showing that the successor judge was granted authority to review the disputed orders.

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. then filed a motion for rehearing of that issue for each of his previous motions for review, going into more detail about the statutory law that clearly authorized the successor judge to review any disputed orders issued by the now recused circuit court judge. 

     The successor circuit court judge summarily denied those five motions for rehearing; that was the end of that process unless defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. filed an appeal of those decisions.  He was already working about 100+ hours per week with his current appeal work and his federal civil case work.  Consequently, he had no time available to get involved with another appeal. 

     He simply had to tolerate the successor circuit court judge's unfair and unethical actions that totally ignored the controlling statutory law involved.  This is another illustration of the "elitist" attitude of the successor judge - he was not going to review and reverse any of the recused judge's orders, no matter how improperly harmful they may have been to defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr.

    Lon Jr. was very busy with his federal court case at that time, and he had also begun his appeal Initial Brief work about the unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions of the first appointed circuit court judge (now recused from the case).  All of this motion activity with the successor judge was an impediment to Lon Willoughby, Jr., especially so with his very busy work schedule full time with various litigation actions.

     The FDA ("former defense attorney") law firm had previously sued non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. because he had refused to pay the law-firm about $3,300 in additional billed attorney fees for their deceitful and fraudulent representation of co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. in the civil case that went to trial in September 1989

     That was the civil case where the FDA knowingly and willfully betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. by allowing the plaintiff's attorney to introduce five "ambush complaints" against said co-trustee after the one-day non-jury "bench trial" was in progress (as explained previously herein in some detail). 

     Several months later, the second circuit court judge conducted a motion hearing (December 12, 1993) that was a two-way motion hearing.  The plaintiff law firm had filed nine motions to be heard in the motion hearing, and defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had then filed seven motions to be heard on the same day.  

     There were 16 motions to be heard that day so each party had a lot of subjects to prepare for argument issues - to either present a motion argument or to present argument that would defend against an opponent's motion.  Remember that non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was from South Carolina, and he had to drive his car 500 miles to attend and participate in that motion hearing.

     The hearing began at 9:00 A.M. and the successor circuit court judge was openly hostile and argumentative toward defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr., making it quite clear that he was not going to provide a fair and impartial motion hearing for the defendant.

     The judge allowed the local law firm to present all of their nine motions in the morning motion hearing and defendant competently presented his argument issues defending him against the plaintiff' nine motions.  That motion hearing lasted about three hours.

     After the lunch break, the judge allowed defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. to begin presenting his first motion.  The judge was very hostile toward defendant Lon Jr. from the first minute of his motion hearing, and the judge clearly tried to intimidate and frustrate defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr.  However, defendant Lon Jr. was calm, cool, and collected, and he responsibly refused to allow the obviously very biased judge to intimidate or frustrate him in any way.  Lon Jr. calmly began presenting his first motion. 

     The judge arrogantly and sarcastically stated: "Mr. Willoughby, you did not tell me (in your motion) what you want me to do about this motion." 

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. then replied:  "Your Honor, I beg to differ, if you will look at page 4, I tell you exactly what I want you to do about this motion."  

     The judge quickly realized that he could not intimidate or frustrate or upset non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr., as the judge clearly intended to do, and he  terminated the motion hearing before hearing the rest of defendant Lon Jr's motions.  The judge verbally ordered Lon Jr. to get an attorney to represent him in any further litigation actions before the court.  The motion hearing was abruptly terminated.

     It was quite obvious to defendant Lon Jr. that the successor circuit court judge was retaliating against him, and punishing him severely, because he had filed his motion for recusal of the previous circuit court judge.  Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had taken that action pursuant to state statutory law that had been written and implemented by the state's legislature for that type of unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial situation. 

     NOTE:  It is important to understand that appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. did eventually win his appeal about the first circuit court judge's dismissal of his counterclaim pleadings.  That unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt Summary Judgment decision, with the plaintiff law firm's attorney's willing participation, had been an extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial scheme. 

     That judge's improper (corrupt) dismissal of Lon Jr's counterclaim complaint (about legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud by the plaintiff law firm and the FDA) would now have to be reinstated and counterclaim plaintiff Lon Willoughby, Jr. could continue with his pro se prosecution of those important complaints.

     However, due to the successor circuit court judge's injunctive order, Lon Jr. would have to get an attorney to represent him in all further actions in the circuit court case.  Lon Jr. will show later why that the unfair and unethical injunctive order had forced Lon Jr. into a litigation position where he would not have any reasonable opportunity to win his counterclaim case against the plaintiff law firm and it's attorney (the FDA). 

     Visitors should consider that the State's Constitution provides a protected right for a litigant to represent himself if he is capable of doing so and desires to do so.  However, on December 12, 1993, that "elitist - minded" circuit court judge took judicial actions that denied defendant Lon Jr. any opportunity to present his own litigation actions pro se.  He would not be allowed to continue representing himself pro se in any further circuit court actions regarding this specific case. 

     Fortunately, defendant Lon Jr. had hired a court reporter to be present for both motion hearings that day and transcribe all of the proceedings.  He then had to drive the 500 miles to get back to his home in Mauldin, South Carolina - near Greenville, SC, knowing that he would now have to file another complex and expensive appeal case to try to defend himself from the unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial actions that denied him his constitutionally protected right to present his motion arguments pro se.

     A few days later, Lon Jr. received an order from said judge, and almost every judicial statement in the order was a bold face lie - deliberate false statements about defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. and his actions in the motion hearing that had been conducted before this extremely biased "elitist" corrupt circuit court judge.  Thank goodness, Lon Jr. would be able to get a transcript record prepared for those two motions hearings.

     All of the unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt statements about defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. were an obvious attempt to malign his pro se litigation actions and tar brush him badly in said order.  He understood that the judge's false statements in that injunctive order would hurt him badly when he appealed the judge's retaliatory action of denying him his constitutionally protected right to continue litigating pro se (without an attorney).

     The injunctive order also stated that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could not file any more "pleadings" in this circuit court case unless the pleadings were signed by an attorney (licensed to practice law in that state).  

     The judge was obviously aware of the dismissal of plaintiff Lon Jr's counterclaim action against the local law firm (that had been dismissed unfairly, unethically, and corruptly by the previous circuit court judge).  That judge then had to promptly recuse himself from the case due to defendant Lon Jr's motion for recusal. 

     That counterclaim dismissal action was now on appeal - by defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr.  Until the appeal was completed, and hopefully reversed, defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's counterclaim would remain dismissed.


Transfer Of The Circuit Court Litigation Back To The County Court

Summary Review of Prior 1989 Circuit Court's Bench Trial Litigation

     The successor circuit court judge transferred the circuit court case back down to the county court's jurisdiction for further adjudication of the law firm's lawsuit against Lon Willoughby, Jr. for the attorney fees that he had refused to pay (for good reasons). 

     Note:  The law firm's lawsuit against Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was initially filed in the County Court to attempt to recover about $3300 in legal fees billed to Lon Jr., but he had refused to pay those fees because the FDA had failed to represent co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. in a competent and responsible manner - regarding the five ambush complaints raised against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during the trial. 

     The trial transcript record (September 1989) accurately reported each of those "defense attorney" objections, and the record showed clearly that he had failed to make proper objections to those ambush complaints.  None of his objections attempted to show that Co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. would be prejudiced (damaged/injured) if those complaints were adjudicated by the judge.

     The Final Judgment for that case showed that Co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. lost the case against him because the trial judge did adjudicate those ambush complaints, and ruled against co-trustee Lon Jr. on three of the five "ambush" complaint issues. 

     Lon Jr. has shown herein previously that those adjudications were improper, based upon the improper and inaccurate testimony by the CPA witness, who was not admitted as an expert witness.  Consequently, none of his testimony should have been considered by the judge.  If the plaintiff's attorney wanted to claim that co-trustee Lon Willoughby's estate planning actions had been improper in some way, they needed to bring in expert  testimony be a bonified trust expert attorney.  Anything short of that was inadequate.

     Defendant Lon Jr's testimony had shown convincingly that the CPA was in fact incompetent to present testimony about the surprise (ambush) complaint issues.

     Lon Jr. has also shown herein that the state's Supreme Court had previously ordered, many years prior to said trial in September 1989, that no surprise complaints could be allowed in a trial unless both parties agreed to litigate each surprise complaint presented.  The judge and the two "opposing" attorneys surely knew about that very important landmark controlling ruling, but they all ignored said ruling as if it did not exist. Those were criminal collusive and conspiratorial litigation actions that caused an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt Final Judgment to be rendered for said case.

     Lon Jr. has also shown herein that the defense attorney objected four time to the introduction of surprise (ambush) complaints, and all four objections failed to show how defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would be prejudiced (damaged) if the trial court judge adjudicated any of the five surprise complaint issues.  Those inadquate objections did not give the judge any authority or opportunity to ignore the controlling Supreme Court's landmark directive to all trial judges in the distant state. 


Another Appeal Situation For Lon Willoughby, Jr.


      At that same time, during Christmas season 1993, plaintiff Lon Willoughby, Jr. was also very busy preparing responsive legal briefs opposing three attorneys who had filed legal brief's in Lon's federal civil action case in the nearby federal court. (75 miles away) 

     He had observed before that attorneys will tactically use the holidays as a time to bunch up litigation actions on an opposing party - to make it more difficult and frustrating for that person to meet some of the tight deadlines that are usually involved in many litigation actions.  The pursuit of fair and impartial justice is not considered by them; it is strictly a matter of using any scheme or tactic that can help them win a litigation action.


Subsequent Litigation Actions in the County Court

     As soon as the case was transferred back to the county court's jurisdiction, the plaintiff law firm started filing a series of litigation actions against defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     The previous Summary Judgment action in the circuit court had dismissed Lon Jr's combined Answer and Counterclaim so he had no effective pleadings left in the case.  The law firm totally ignored that important situation and quickly filed discovery actions regarding those stricken pleadings, as if the pleadings had not been stricken. 

     Lon Jr's pleadings had initially moved the case into the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court because the damage amount claimed in Lon Willoughby's Counterclaim exceeded the jurisdictional limit of the County Court ($25,000).  His counterclaim was seeking a damage award of $600,000 so the case had to be transferred up to the circuit court.

     With no combined Answer and Counterclaim pleading active in the county court case, there was no legitimate basis to conduct discovery actions, but the plaintiff law firm proceeded with those actions anyway.  You will find out why in a few minutes.

     NOTE:  Discovery actions in a litigation is the process used to obtain more information from a litigant about the claims that they made in their pleadings.  One may want to  "discover" additional information to the information shown in the litigant's pleadings.

     The law firm submitted a very complex set of Interrogatories to Lon Jr. (by U.S. Mail) that asked him many questions and most of those questions were not about his pleadings - which had been stricken in the circuit court's Summary Judgment order that had falsely claimed that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's counterclaim had been filed after the statute of limitations had expired. 

     Remember that the circuit court's order about this issue was a bold faced lie by the circuit court judge and the law firm's FDA (the former defense attorney - who had previously betrayed co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. during the trial in September 1989).  That Summary Judgment order was now being appealed by defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr.

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. responsibly replied to the Interrogatories in a timely manner with many pages of word processed explanations to all of the relevant questions, and he specifically objected to answering several questions that were irrelevant to his dismissed pleadings. Those questions were obviously harassment questions to try to ensnare defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. in other improper and non-relevant issues. 

     During that interval of time (since the December 12, 1993 circuit court motion hearing), defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had tried to locate an attorney to represent him in the ongoing litigation, but no attorney wanted to represent a non-resident litigant who was as knowledgeable and competent as Lon Willoughby, Jr. appeared to be. 

     After all, defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had previously prosecuted an appeal pro se in the state's appellate court.

     He had previously filed a successful motion to recuse a circuit court judge in the original circuit court case.    

     As a non-resident plaintiff, he had also filed a civil action complaint in the nearby federal court (75 miles away) where plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was suing three attorneys(in that state) for legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud.

     Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had previously conducted his own defensive litigation actions initially in the county court litigation for the instant case, and he filed his counterclaim pleadings, causing the case to be transferred to the circuit court.  His
very serious counterclaim action had been filed pro se against his FDA (former defense attorney) and the attorney's law firm for legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud.

     He had then conducted several months of litigation actions in the circuit court for this related case, after the case was transferred to the circuit court, including proceeding pro se in the Summary Judgment motion hearing that was reported herein previously. 

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had filed an appeal of that motion hearing (dismissing his counterclaim case improperly - corruptly) and was prosecuting that appeal pro se. 

     He had also proceeded pro se in the circuit court with the successor judge, filing five motions for rehearing of five orders issued by the recused circuit court judge.

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had also defended himself pro se in the circuit court's motion hearing conducted in December 1993 - against nine motions presented by the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA), and he was also prepared to present argument in favor of the seven motions that Willoughby had filed for adjudication on that day.

     He had then timely filed an appeal of the successor judge's injunctive order that denied defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. his constitutionally protected right to proceed pro se in that ongoing circuit court litigation.

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. was currently proceeding pro se in the county court litigation, after the case was transferred from the circuit court down to the county court.

     WOW!!! What trial court attorney would be willing to represent a litigant who was capable of doing all of that pro se?  The answer to that question:  no trial attorney!!!   

     Lon Jr. realized that the successor circuit court judge understood that it would very likely be impossible for him to find an attorney that would be willing to represent him in the case, especially so where his counterclaim pleadings had sued his FDA and the plaintiff law firm for legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud. 

     If he could find an attorney willing to do that, the cost would likely be very expensive - probably with an upfront retainer fee of $10,000 or more - maybe $20,000.  Lon Jr. did not have the funds to do that, and he also realized that if he hired a local trial attorney to represent him, the attorney would likely "cooperate" with the plaintiff law firm and the FDA to cause non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. to lose in the litigation process.

     Consequently, defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. realized that the successor judge's injunctive order meant that defendant Lon Jr. would not be able to prosecute his counterclaim in the circuit court (after winning his appeal about the improperly dismissed counterclaim complaint). 

     Defendant Lon Jr. also realized that he needed to win the appeal that he had filed about that December 12, 1993 injunctive order, but he also realized that the series of false statements made in that injunctive order to malign and tar brush him with the appellate court judges would likely cause him to lose that appeal.

     In that event, he would lose his constitutionally protected right to proceed pro se due to an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt successor circuit court judge who was obviously helping the "local" plaintiff law firm and its attorney (the FDA) avoid having to litigate against non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's very serious counterclaim complaints.

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. realized that it was unlikely that he would win his appeal about the injunctive order (requiring him to hire an attorney) because the judge's injunctive order had made several unfair, unethical, and extremely false statements about defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., and he had no ggod effective way to defend against those false statements.  He had enough legal experience to understand that the appellate court judges were going to believe the circuit court judge rather than believe his defensive argument statements, even though he had a transcript record of those events.

     Lon Jr. realized that those false statements would likely prejudice the appellate court judges against him severely, probably causing him to lose his appeal, although there was no evidence in the Record on Appeal to support the circuit court judge's false statements about defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. 

     The Record on Appeal contained a transcript of the motion hearings conducted on December 12, 1993, and the transcript record showed that defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. was a responsible and competent defendant that was respectful toward the very biased and argumentative judge, but he did diplomatically defend himself from the judge's improper verbal actions. 


Additional Litigation in the County Court

     A few weeks after the case had been transferred down to the Circuit Court, Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. mailed a short one page letter to the county court judge to inform him that he had not been able to obtain legal representation from an attorney so he would have to continue in the case in his pro se capacity.  He sent a duplicate copy of that letter to the "local" plaintiff law firm (as required to avoid ex parte communications).

     Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. understood that the circuit court's injunctive order would have no effect on the case after it was transferred back to the county court.  These were two separate courts (circuit court and county court) and each of the courts had specified jurisdictional boundaries that did not mix or overlap in any way. 

    However, Lon Jr. also realized that the plaintiff law firm and the county court judge would likely attempt to improperly enforce that circuit court order in the county court's jurisdiction because that is what the plaintiff law firm's attorney would want to happen. 

    Defendant Lon Jr. understood that a "pleading" was any document filed in the case that attempted to move the case forward - such as a motion for some action in the case.  Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. realized that his brief letter to the county court judge did not qualify as a "pleading" in the case.  The letter did not attempt to move the litigation forward or anywhere else.  It just explained that Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. did not have an attorney to represent him in the ongoing litigation actions in the county court and he would need to continue litigating in his pro se capacity (no attorney assistance).

     The plaintiff law firm's FDA used that letter to start an improper "contempt of court" litigation process against non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., alleging that writing that letter had violated the circuit court's injuctive order - requiring him to get an attorney to sign any "pleadings" that were subsequently filed in the circuit court case.

     That complaint was absurd and ridiculous.  Lon's letter was not a pleading (an action that moved the litigation process forward).  Furthermore, the letter to a county court judge was in the jurisdictional purview of the county court; it was not in the purview of the circuit court. 

     It was obvious to anyone with any common sense that defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's letter to the county court judge did not violate the circuit court's injunctive order about hiring an attorney to sign any further pleadings presented in the circuit court case

     The case litigation was now in the county court, it was not in the circuit court, and Lon Jr. was confident that the circuit court's unfair and unethical injunctive order would have no effect upon litigation that would be occuring in the county court's jurisdiction.

     However, the unfair, unethical, and corrupt county court judge "cooperated" with the "local" plaintiff law firm's FDA, and proceeded to schedule a trial to prosecute non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for "contempt of court" (contempt of the county court).  DefendantWilloughby had not violated any county court order so it was clear to him that he could not be legally adjudicated in "contempt of court" for the county court.

     Non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. did not drive the 500 miles to attend the scheduled trial for the court's prosecution of  said defendant for "contempt of court" of the county court.  Lon Jr. was confident that the county court judge had no judicial authority to attempt to enforce a circuit court's injunctive order in the county court. 

     This meant that the judge had no subject-matter jurisdiction to conduct that "contempt of court" trial about defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's action to simple write a one-page letter explaining that he had not found an attorney willing to represent him. 

     The unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt county court judge did conduct said trial, and he summarily convicted non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. of "contempt of court" (of the county court) and sentenced Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to a jail term in the local county jail - for several months.

     Since defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. did not attend the trial in the distant state, the judge could not have him promptly locked up in the local jail (as he and the local law firm's FDA had intended).  Consequently, the county court judge then issued an arrest warrant that was communicated to all sheriff's offices in the distant state - arrest Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. if he can be found anywhere in the state (and then arrange with the county court judge for his transportation to said county for incarceration in the county jail).

    The local plaintiff law firm's FDA then filed a motion with the county court which claimed that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had not responded to the plaintiff's Interrogatories.   

    When that issue subsequently came up before the county court judge in the plaintiff law firm's motion hearing, defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. could not be present to defend himself because of the improper arrest warrant issued by the county court judge for Lon Willoughby's arrest.  You see, that was part of the pre-planned strategy.  Get an arrest warrant issued for Lon Willoughby, Jr's arrest, and then hold a motion hearing where he would not be able to attend and defend himself from the plaintiff law firm's FDA's false claim that Lon Jr. had not responded to the plaintiff law firm's Interrogatory questions.

     The arrest warrant was improperly issued because the county court had no subject-matter jurisdiction to attempt to enforce the circuit court order issued in December 1993 that prohibited defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. from filing any "pleadings" in the circuit court case that were not signed by an attorney. 

     Furthermore, Lon Jr. had not been able to obtain legal services from any attorney so he had no defensive attorney representation at the county court motion hearing about the Interrogatories

     Knowing that defendant Lon Willoughby was boxed in and could not offer any kind of defensive action, the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA) directly lied to the judge about that Interrogatories issue during the plaintiff's motion hearing.  The plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA) falsely and fraudulently claimed that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had not responded to the plaintiff's Interrogatories

     The county court judge issued an order (drafted by that same FDA attorney) that charged defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. $50.00 per day until he answered the Interrogatories.  (The same interrogatories that defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had already answered and timely mailed to said plaintiff law firm).

     Fortunately, Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had voluntarily scheduled a court reporter to be present to record the conversations at that motion hearing between the county court judge and the plaintiff law firm's attorney (yes, the FDA - the same unfair, unethical, corrupt attorney that we have identified herein previously). 

     Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. paid for the transcript record of that short motion hearing, and that is how he later learned about the attorney's extremely unfair, unethical, and fraudulent lying actions during that motion hearing before the county court judge. The judge probably knew that the attorney was lying, and he probably played along with the attorney's unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt scheme to get the judge to issue a discovery violation fine ($50.00 per day).

     Lon Jr. had a transcript of that motion hearing, and it verified that the judge made no responsible effort to determine what response defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. made to the plaintiff law firm's Interrogatories.  The judge just instantly "assumed" that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had failed to provide any information at all about the Interrogatory questions.  The judge should have simply asked:  "did the defendant provide any response to the Interrogatories?"  But you see, the judge did not want to know the answer to that question because that information would have put the attorney on the spot to determine if he was being honest with the judge. 

     Even though Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had a transcript record of that motion hearing, he could not communicate with the county court judge with a letter, explaining that the attorney had lied about defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's interrogatory response. 

     The extremely unfair, unethical, corrupt county court judge had already held defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in "contempt of court" (of the county court) for simply sending the judge a letter that explained that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had not been able to obtain an attorney to represent him in the county court litigation. 

     Due to the improper arrest warrant issued by this same county court judge, defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could not travel to the distant state to defend himself in any motion hearings or other litigation actions.  Consequently, he was boxed in with no way to be able to defend himself from the false complaints of the plaintiff law firm's attorney (FDA).     

Lon's Appeal Case Won

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. fortunately won his appeal about the Summary Judgment dismissal of his Counterclaim.  Consequently, the litigation would now need to be transferred back to the circuit court because Lon Jr's dismissed combined Answer and Counterclaim would now be reinstated in the circuit court litigation. 

     Defendant Lon Willoughby Jr. then mailed a brief letter to the new successor circuit court judge that had been assigned to the case.  Lon's brief letter explained that he had not been able to find an attorney willing to represent him in the ongoing litigation.

     The case had not been transferred back to the circuit court yet, and the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA) then collusively worked with the county court judge to hold defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in "contempt of court" again for having written that letter to the newly appointed circuit court judge. 

     Another trial was scheduled for the second "contempt of court" complaint.   Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. then mailed a letter to the county court judge that explained that his letter to the circuit court judge was not a pleading, and there was no valid basis for the "contempt of court" trial that had been scheduled in the county court. 

     Lon's letter also explained that the county court judge did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to attempt to prosecute Lon Willoughby, Jr. for contempt of court based upon the circuit court's order about "pleadings" in the circuit court case because it was a circuit court order, relevant and valid only in the circuit court - not in the county court. 

     Lon Jr. believed that the circuit court order did not provide the county court judge with authority to attempt to enforce the circuit court's order.  The circuit court was capable of enforcing its own order, if the circuit court believed that it's order had been violated, and Lon understood that a county court judge cannot take those enforcement actions for the circuit court.

Criminal Contempt of Court Allegation

     That letter by defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. was used by the plaintiff law firm's attorney to scheme with the county court judge to prosecute defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for "criminal contempt of court" - a misdemeanor crime that would enable the county court judge to get the local prosecutor's staff attorneys involved in prosecuting non-resident Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for the alleged "criminal contempt of court" misdemeanor crime.

     To make a long and complex situation much shorter, we will summarize by reporting that the county court judge went forward with separate "contempt of court" actions as apparently recommended by the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA - the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorney that had knowingly and willfully betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in the circuit court's "equity court" bench trial conducted back in September 1989).  We are now reporting litigation actions in the spring of 1994.

     It was obvious to non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. that he should not travel 500 miles to the distant state and attempt to represent himself pro se in the second "contempt of court" trial.  It was a forgone conclusion that no matter what responsible valid defense Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. presented, the county court judge was going to convict him in the second "contempt of court" trial. 

     If defendant Willoughby was foolish enough to attend that trial, the county court judge would then have had him immediately arrested and locked up in the local county jail.  However, defendant Lon Jr. was not foolish, and he did not attend the second "contempt of court" trial, just like he did not attend the first "contempt of court" trial.

    The county court judge had now proceeded to conduct a trial court hearing for each of the first two civil "contempt of court" cases, and the county court judge had now summarily convicted non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. of civil "contempt of court" in two separate cases.  He was sentenced to a jail term for each conviction.

    The county court judge subsequently scheduled a trial to prosecute defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. for an alleged "criminal contempt of court" case with a state prosecutor's staff attorney scheduled to providing the prosecution's case against non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  That trial was about the letter that Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had subsequently written to the county court judge explaining that his previous letter to the newly selected successor circuit court judge was not a "pleading" and had therefore not violated the circuit court's injunctive order.


Lon Willoughby's Motion to Dismiss

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. then filed a motion pro se in the county court to dismiss the scheduled trial prosecution for the alleged "criminal contempt of court" case.  The county court judge, upon advise of the local state prosecutor's prosecuting attorney, denied Lon's motion and the "criminal contempt of court" prosecution trial was going to be conducted as previously scheduled. 

     Non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. did not travel to the distant state for that trial, but he was summarily convicted anyway and sentenced to another jail term. 

     Defendant Lon Jr. wisely did not drive to the distant state and attempt to defend himself in any of the three "contempt of court" prosecutions because it was clear to him that he would not receive a fair and impartial trial for any of those improper prosecution actions.  It was clear to him that the county court judge was extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt, and Lon Jr. was not about to voluntarily travel to the distant state to participate in any of those unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt trials.


Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's Appeal to Circuit Court

     Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. timely appealed the county court judge's denial of his Motion to Dismiss the scheduled "criminal contempt of court" prosecution.  Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. presented his own arguments pro se on appeal to the circuit court judge who heard the appeal case via appeal legal brief arguments. 

     The same state prosecutor's staff attorney that had improperly and unethically prosecuted defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for "criminal contempt of court" then presented the appellee's legal brief argument issues in opposition to Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's appeal Initial Brief arguments.  

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. won the appeal case because the circuit court judge (a one judge appeal case) agreed with Appellant Lon Jr. that the county court judge did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to attempt to enforce an order issued by a circuit court judge. 

     Unfortunately, that appeal case did not automatically rescind the three jail time sentences that had been ordered improperly by the county court judge (he did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to attempt to enforce the circuit court's order so the orders that he had issued were all now null and void - totally invalid orders).  However, until the judge formerly acknowledges that, those unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt "contempt of court" convictions still appear to be valid.  They needed to be rescinded. 

     The extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt county court judge could have easily taken actions on his own initiative to rescind each of those improper convictions (probably in less than 20 minutes of time), but he did not do that.  Those improper convictions have now been on the books for about 24 years against nonresident Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. - still living in Mauldin, South Carolina.

     Visitors need to understand how the system works: the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the extremely corrupt FDA) and the corrupt county court judge, and then the corrupt prosecuting attorney, were all trying to force non-resident defendant to hire a local attorney to provide legal representation for Lon Jr.  They wanted defendant Lonnie  Willoughby, Jr. to have to spend many thousands of dollars as a retainer for said attorney representation. 

     The county court judge should have promptly rescinded the three improper "contempt of court" convictions (Lon Jr's appeal decision showed that the county court judge did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to attempt to convict defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. for alleged violations of the circuit court's injunctive order).  The county court judge should have also promptly rescinded the two arrest warrants that he had issued improperly for defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's arrest - if he could be found within the state.  Those two arrest warrants could have been withdrawn in just a few minutes of the judge's time.  They werealso issued based upon the judge's three grossly improper convictions of non-resident defendant for "contempt of court." 

     However, the county court judge did not rescind those two arrest warrants on his own initiative, as he should have done, and those arrest warrants are still on the books as valid arrest warrants with every sheriff's office in that state (for the past 24 years). 

     Lon has reported these situations herein to show visitors how unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judges and prosecutors can be when they collusively "cooperate" with unfair and unethical self-serving vindictive litigation actions proposed by a local law firm - the plaintiff in the litigation against non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. trying to recover about $3,300 in attorney fees for their grossly fraudulent representation of co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in the circuit court trial conducted September 1989.

    

Judicial Courts Can Be Very Corrupt

Are They A Form of Organized Crime?

     Over a period of more than 20 years of related litigation actions, litigant Lonnie  Willoughby, Jr. had to contend with numerous unfair and unethical litigation schemes and tactics by the attorneys involved in the distant state litigation. 

     Lon Jr. also had to contend with unfair and unethical trial court judges in every litigation action in the distant state's judicial system for 20+ years.  Over the years, Lon reluctantly concluded that their judicial system was in fact another form of extremely unfair, unethical, criminal-minded selfish and self-serving organized crime.

    Lon had not done anything wrong or illegal, but officers of the unfair, unethical, self-serving "judicial system" in the distant state (500 miles from where Lon lives in Mauldin, SC) subsequently set about collusively to harass, persecute, and punish Lonnie Jr. maliciously and ruthlessly with related litigation actions that went on, month after month, year after year, for more than 20 years in the distant southern state's judicial system. 

     Those litigation actions interfered greatly with Lon Willoughby's efforts to manage his complex healthcare and wellness store in Greenville, South Carolina, and they interfered greatly with his life, and they placed a tremendous amount of emotional stress on him and his wife that directly affected Lon's health severly and probably shortened his lifespan by more than ten years.

     Lon Jr. had to travel back and forth to the distant state nine times, causing him to drive his car about 9,000 miles - taking more than 180 hours of travel time (twenty hours per round trip) for the nine trips that he made to the distant state to participate in various litigation actions designed to frustrate and irritate him as much as possible, and to be as expensive and damaging as possible for him. 

     There were several other litigation actions that Lon Jr. needed to participate in within the distant state, but Lon's previous "defense attorney" schemed with the local county court judge to prosecute defendant Lonnie Willoughby Jr. for unfair, unethical, and fraudulent "contempt of court" charges three times as explained briefly above. 

     Due to those improper "contempt of court" convictions, and the improper arrest warrants issued for defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's arrest, he was ruthlessly denied any fair opportunity to travel into that state to defend himself in the ongoing litigation actions. 

     The two arrest warrants also prevented plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. from being able to travel into the state to prosecute his federal court civil action where he had sued three attorneys for legal malpractice, deceit and fraud.  The case was summarily dismissed because plaintiff Lon Willoughby, Jr. could not travel into the state and prosecute his civil action lawsuit. 

     Visitors to this department need to understand that Lon Willoughby, Jr. had a constitutionally protected right to present his own litigation arguments and defenses, and the attorneys and judges involved in all of that litigation for more than 20 years knew that without any doubt.  They also learned that Lon Willoughby was capable of presenting his own litigation arguments in a competent manner.

     The problem was that they cared nothing about his constitutionally protected right to proceed pro se (without attorney assistance).  They clearly wanted to force defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. into situations (unfairly, unethically, and corruptly) that would force him to hire one of their "local" attorneys, at a very expensive price ($10,000 to $20,000 retainer fee - cash up front). 

     They knew that any local attorney that defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. hired (if he could find one that would take up his case - most unlikely) would be one of their "legal brotherhood members" who they could count on to "play along" with their unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation schemes and tactics so that in the end, defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would lose in every situation and they would ultimately win, just as they did anyway when he refused to get caught in their criminal-minded scheme. 


Unfair and Unethical Contempt of Court Charges - Summary Review

     The law firm's attorney and the local county court judge worked together to collusively "convict" Lon Jr. three times of "contempt of court" in extremely unfair and unethical criminal-minded adjudication schemes, as reported above. 

     The county court judge sentenced defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to jail for a total of ten months in year 1994 - for the judge's three contempt of court convictions which were all done without any subject-matter jurisdiction.  That was proven by defendant Lon Willoughby's appeal win of the dismissal of his pro se motion to dismiss the scheduled "criminal contempt of court" prosecution.  

     As reported above, Lon Jr. did not travel to the distant state to attempt to defend himself about those improper and unethical "contempt of court" charges because he already knew how unfair, unethical, and corrupt their judicial system was.  Lon knew that they were going to convict him, no matter what kind of valid responsible defensive information he presented to the county court judge. 

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. did not travel to the distant state for the first "contempt of court" case that they collusively charged him with (the local county court judge and the local plaintiff law firm's attorney - FDA).  Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had no doubts that he would be improperly arrested and put in jail for the "contempt of court" case if he foolishly gave them an opportunity to do that.

     As it turned out, as reported previously, there were two subsequent cases of "contempt of court" filed against him.  The FDA (former defense attorney) acted in collusion with the local county court judge, and the state prosecutor's office (for the third contempt case).  After the first contempt conviction, Lon Jr. would have already been in their local jail, and they knew that defendant Lon Jr. would not be able to defend himself "pro se" against each of the other (two) "contempt of court" charges (because he would be a prisoner in their local county jail).

     Lon Jr. understood that his previous "defense attorney" (the FDA) and the local county court judge were collusively trying to force him to have to hire an attorney to defend him in their "contempt of court" charges.  He understood that they wanted defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to have to spend tens of thousands of dollars for attorney fees that would ultimately be a futile effort. 

     Defendant Lon Jr. understood that the local judicial system was so disgustingly corrupt, and operated in such an extremely selfish self-serving manner, that any local attorney that he might hire to represent him would certainly play along with their self-serving schemes and tactics to convict Lon Willoughby, Jr. of "contempt of court" and keep him locked up in the local county jail for many months.

     Would any attorney that he might have hired filed an appeal, as Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. did, and win the appeal decision that showed that the county court judge did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to attempt to enforce the circuit court's injunctive order against defendant Lon Jr.?   No, an attorney would not have done that because that would have exposed the extreme corruption involved in all of their previous "contempt of court" schemes against non-resident Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     The three "contempt of court" complaints and their subsequent convictions accumulated jail time until they had a total of ten months of jail time adjudicated against non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. However, he had wisely refused to travel to the distant state in a futile effort to defend himself in their unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt county court.  Consequently, he managed to stay out of their local county jail for 24 years.


Another Reason For Their Unfair, Unethical Judicial Schemes

     Another very important part of their collusive strategy was to prevent Lonnie Jr. from being able to travel into the distant state.  The plaintiff law firm knew that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had already filed a civil complaint type lawsuit in the federal district court that was located about 75 miles away from that  county court area, and Lon's previous "defense attorney" was one of the defendants in that case. 

     Their collusive unfair and unethical "contempt of court" conviction(s) meant that non-resident Lon Willoughby, Jr. could not travel into that distant state to prosecute his federal case pro se because the  previous "defendant attorney" would make sure that Plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would be arrested if he showed up at the federal district court for any scheduled litigation actions in his civil action federal court lawsuit case (in the large city about 75 miles away from the county court's location). 

     Every sheriff in the distant state had two warrants for Lon Willoughby, Jr's arrest - if he could be found anywhere in the state.  Lon Jr. was therefore unable to travel to that state to prosecute his federal case against the "defense attorney" and the case was eventually dismissed because Plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could not participate in any scheduled actions.

     Those arrest warrants have been on the books with each sheriff in the distant state since 1994 - it is now 2018 - so that is about 24 years that Lon has been denied a fair opportunity to travel into that state and attempt to defend himself in their extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt courts. 

     Fortunately, Lon had sufficient good judgment and legal skills in 1994 to not allow them to be able to put him in jail.  With all of the unfair and unethical criminality that Lon Willoughby, Jr. has personally experienced in their "local" criminal-minded outrageously corrupt judicial system, he had good reasons to believe that he would have likely never gotten out of their local county jail alive. 

     They could have easily had Lon Willoughby, Jr. killed while in their local county jail.  In that event, millions of freedom-loving patriotic American citizens would have never had the very important opportunity to visit this Website and learn about these extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt selfish and self-serving judicial actions - by simply reviewing this very important department.


Corrupt Unethical Court Systems Despise

Honest Litigants Who Have Courage and Integrity

     Visitors need to understand that corrupt court systems vehemently despise any litigant who has the courage, integrity, and ability to expose them by responsibly reporting their unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt trial court actions on appeal, as Lon Willoughby has done numerous times. 

     You will learn below that the appellate court struck one of appellant Lon Willoughby's appeal briefs because he told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about the extremely unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded judicial actions that had been taken against him in the trial court below.  The appellate court judges showed that they did not want to hear about the judicial corruption below.

     Lon spent more than 15,000 hours of his time over 20+ years trying to defend himself from their corrupt litigation schemes and tactics and judicial actions against him. That is the equivalent of working 40+ hours per week for seven very difficult extremely stressful years in trying to cope with their self-serving corrupt judicial schemes and tactics in numerous trial court actions.  Those judicial actions forced non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby to file and prosecute more than ten  appellate court cases.  He needed to file several more appeals, but he realized that they would very likely be futile waste of a lot of work and money - based on his previous experiences with appeals.

     Those situations were clearly extremely unfair, unethical, criminal-minded retaliation litigation schemes against Lon Jr. - all because he had personally gotten involved in helping his aging parents develop an inter vivos Trust Agreement for each parent, and then he completed the drafting, typing, and filing of the amendment documents for both Trust Agreements - but especially for his father's Trust Agreement estate management and settlement plan. 

     Lon Jr. had to do that amendment work himself because he could not locate an attorney competent (or willing) to complete the amendment process that was needed. The next paragraph will show the great reduction in potential probate processing fees that no attorney wanted to help Lon Jr. accomplish with an appropriate Trust Agreement.

     Lon's trust amendment process was subsequently very successful after his father died.  The Amended Trust Agreement reduced the state's probate court processing expenses to less than $400 for a substantial size estate where the normal probate expenses could have been $50,000 or more.  As stated previously, the probate court process was also completed within 24 hours, rather than taking several months to a year or more that is fairly typical with many probate estate processes. 

     The Amended Trust Agreement also reduced the federal estate taxes to zero for the entire Willoughby estate (for Lon's parents), saving approximately $225,000 in potential federal estate taxes (based on the federal estate tax law requirements that were current at that time - in year 1986).      

     All of that relevant estate settlement information was readily available to the two corrupt attorneys involved and the corrupt circuit court judge involved in the persecution of co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr.  Do you see any ruthless and malicious retaliation going on against Lonnie Jr. in those events that went on in their trial courts and appellate courts for 20+ years of related litigation actions

     Those unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt self-serving litigation actions and judicial processes enabled the two local attorneys that were involved to eventually (improperly and unethically) confiscate $126,000+ out of Lon Jr's trust account funds in a local bank in the distant state.  A trust account fund that Lon Jr's father and mother had agreed to leave for him in the deceased father's trust estate in that distant state (the parent's state of residence).  

     The two attorney's court approved confiscation essentially depleted most of the remaining funds left in the Willoughby trust bank account for son Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  Both of his parents had worked very hard for more than 50 years to accumulate those family funds - 50+ years X two people equals more than 100 years of hard and difficult dedicated self-employed work by Lon Jr's parents. 

     That $126,000+ was taken away from defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. due to a 20+ years litigation process that was so unfair, so unethical, and so disgustingly corrupt that it is frightening to realize that all of that occurred in America with Lon Willoughby, Jr. diligently spending thousands of hours of work time trying to oppose those criminal-minded litigation schemes, tactics, and corrupt judicial actions.

     The two corrupt attorneys (brothers) that were subsequently involved in those events some 20+ years later, after the unfair, unethical, and corrupt equity court bench trial conducted in September 1989, were sons of the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt "defense attorney" that had knowingly and willfully betrayed his client, co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., during that 1989 trial. 

     The two attorney brothers effectively took those trust account funds away from son Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. like dishonest ruthless criminal bank thieves, and they had the county court judge's very generous improper help and full blessings in doing so.

     That amount of money was allegedly for their accumulating attorney fees and interest charges, over a period of 20+ years of related litigation actions, and for their grossly improper alleged discovery violation fines ($50 per day for many months).  However, there was no discovery violation by defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. - the plaintiff law firm's attorney (Lon's previous "defense attorney") simply lied about that issue when the issue was heard by the county court judge in the law firm's motion hearing scheduled for that purpose. 

    Non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby Jr. could not appear in the motion hearing proceeding in the distant state to defend himself due to the two improper arrest warrants (for his arrest) that had been issued by that same county court judge to all sheriff's in the state.

     Substantial amounts of interest had accumulated for the improperly alleged accumulating attorney fees for their 20+ years of litigation actions involving non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  However, all of those alleged attorney fees, the improperly alleged discovery penalty fine, and the interest rates applied were all improper and unethical charges that they were not legally entitled to collect from Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for their alleged legal services.  We will explain some of those improper charges in the next section below.


How Did The Law Firm's Attorney Fee Dispute Begin?

     That litigation process started over a dispute with a local law firm about attorney fees of about 3,300 dollars.  The "defense attorney law firm" billed Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for an additional $3,300 in legal fees after Lon's "defense attorney" had unfairly, unethically, and fraudulently allowed the plaintiff's attorney to ambush co-trustee Lon Jr. during the one-day bench trial (September 1989) with five surprise complaint issues about complex trust estate legal issues and federal estate taxation issues - five issues that had not been noticed in the plaintiff's pleadings against co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. 

     Lon's defense attorney objected to each of those surprise ambush complaint issues being adjudicated in the case, but the circuit court judge instantly overruled each of his objections.  Many months later, Lon discovered that his defense attorney's objections had been inadequate objections because none of those objections showed that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would be prejudiced in any meaningful way if those surprise ambush complaint issues were to be adjudicated. 

     Lon's defense attorney was a very intelligent and very accomplished attorney with about 22 years of litigation experience, and most of that experience was in the local state court system.  Consequently, he was well experienced and very knowledgeable about the state court procedures.  For him to pretend that he did not know how to object to surprise complaint issues during trial was a heinous criminal-minded fraud upon non-resident defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     The "defense attorney" surely knew that his objections must show (explain) how co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. would be prejudiced if the trial court judge adjudicated any of the surprise (ambush) complaint issues.  The "defense attorney's" grossly incompetent trial court actions in that respect committed legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud upon client co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  One of his objections stated something like this:  "Your honor, we object to these complaints, that is not why we are here today." 

     Visitors need to understand that an objection like that is absolutely worthless in a subsequent appeal case.  The objection did not show how defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would be prejudiced if the surprise complaint issues were adjudicated by the trial court judge.  However, at the time of that trial, defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. did not know anything about what constitutes a valid objection.  His defense attorney objected four times to the surprise (ambush) complaints being introduced during the trial, but he offered no proper objections although he had about 22 years of litigation experience in that state.

     After the trial, Lon Jr. gradually began to realize that his very smart "defense attorney" had betrayed his litigation interests in a deliberate and grossly fraudulent way.  His deficient trial court actions about the surprise complaints (deliberate deficient objections) caused co-trustee Lon Jr. to lose a family dispute civil case about trust administration income distributions that should have been easy for the "defense attorney" to win. 

     In fact, the "defense attorney" did win on those two properly noticed complaint issues as shown in the Final Judgment that was rendered by the circuit court judge.  The trial showed that Lon Jr. had been a very competent and responsible family member co-trustee, and he had done nothing wrong during the years that he had been a co-trustee with his brother (from January 1983 to September 1989). 

     However, the trial transcript record also showed that the "defense attorney" allowed the plaintiff's attorney to ambush co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. as reported previously.  That was the legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud actions that caused the attorney fee dispute reported above.

     The Final Judgment showed that the trial court judge ruled in co-trustee Lon Willoughby's favor for the two dispute issues that were pleaded in the trust beneficiary plaintiff's Complaint against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  However, the Final Judgment also showed that the trial court judge ruled against co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. on three of the five surprise (ambush) complaint issues. 

     Consequently, co-trustee Lon Jr. lost the case due to the plaintiff's attorney's unfair and unethical scheme to introduce five surprise complaint issues while the trial was in progress, and the fact that co-trustee Lon Jr's "defense attorney" effectively "cooperated" with the ambush complaints scheme.  

     The surprise complaint issues gave the unfair, unethical, and corrupt trial court judge the reason that he apparently wanted to remove co-trustee Lonnie Jr. as a co-trustee of his deceased father's trust estate - even though Lon Jr. had been selected for that position by his father.  That situation was apparently one of the outcomes that the vindictive plaintiff (trust beneficiary) wanted for the case.



"Defense Attorney's" Law Firm Contract

With Co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     It is very important to understand that Defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby Jr. had a written litigation contract with the law firm representing him that clearly stated - that in the event of a dispute about legal services, Lon would be responsible for paying only a 10% litigation fee to the law firm if Lon Willoughby, Jr. lost in the litigation services dispute case.   NOTE:  10% of $3,300 is $330. 

     However, the complex litigation processes during those 20+ years of related litigation actions were conducted in such unfair and unethical and corrupt ways that the law firm was enabled to add in a large alleged discovery violation penalty (improperly - the attorney lied to the judge about that issue), large amounts of attorney fees (improperly - contrary to the contract that co-trustee Lonnie Jr. had with the law firm as described briefly above) and the large amounts of interest income that had accumulated for years on all of those alleged amounts - they calculated that it all came to more than $126,000+.

     They actually collected (confiscated) that amount out of Lon Jr's trust account funds (in that distant state) through the court appointed trustee (the incompetent CPA witness in September 1989).  They succeeded with those unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions - in spite of everything that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. did during 20+ years of related litigation actions to try to oppose those outrageously unfair and unethical criminal-minded litigation schemes and tactics.

     That is a very complex situation (much too complex to attempt to summarize here), but the county court judge who subsequently rendered that fraudulent Final Judgment against Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (about the attorney fees dispute) did not even have subject-matter jurisdiction over those litigation actions.  It was illegal for the judge to adjudicate those issues because litigation actions involving disbursement of trust estate assets must be conducted in the circuit court's "equity court" - not in the county court.  It is clearly improper and illegal to conduct such litigation actions in the county court. 

     The fact that the county court judge had no subject-matter jurisdiction over the disbursement of trust estate funds was one more situation where relevant proper litigation standards were totally ignored by the attorneys involved and the trial court judge involved, even though pro se defendant litigant Lon Willoughby explained that situation to the judge orally (during his scheduled telephone conference call participation in the distant state county court's Final Judgment hearing).  Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had also explained that situation in more detail in his defensive legal brief arguments that he properly filed for the county court's Final Judgment hearing in the distant state court (all participants participated via conference type long distance telephone calls). The county court judge probably did not bother to even read through defendant Lon Jr's very important defensive legal brief.

     The two brother attorneys were able to confiscate $126,000+ from Lon Jr's trust account funds in a local bank in the distant state through the court appointed trustee because the local court system was so outrageously unfair, unethical, and corrupt that the county court judge knowingly allowed the attorney brothers to take those confiscation actions in spite of everything that Lonnie Willoughby Jr. did with his defensive oral legal arguments and his relevant defensive legal brief arguments. 

     Lon Jr. responsibly tried to stop those unfair and illegal trust funds confiscation actions, but he could not overcome all of the extreme judicial bias against him by a series of disgustingly unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt trial court judges over that 20+ years of related litigation actions.

     Lon's defensive detailed legal brief arguments, filed in that Final Judgment hearing, clearly showed the presiding county court judge how the litigation processes had been unfair and unethical for many years leading up to this improper county court Final Judgment hearing - where the presiding county court judge did not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the trust funds distribution legal issues involved.

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's defensive legal brief, filed timely in he Final Judgment action,  contained a copy of the appeal judgment decision that he had won showing that the county court did not have jurisdiction to try to enforce the circuit court's order stating that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could not file any more pleadings in the circuit court case unless the pleadings were signed by an attorney.  Therefore, the three "contempt of court" convictions that the prior county court judge had ordered were improper and invalid because that county court judge did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to conduct those contempt of court trials against defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     The improper arrest warrants that the county court judge had issued for Lon Willoughby, Jr's arrest had prevented him from being able to travel to the distant state and participate and defend himself in the motion hearing that the county court judge had conducted about the alleged discover violation (alleged by the plaintiff law firm's attorney - the grossly unethical and dishonest "defense attorney" that had betrayed co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. in the circuit court's equity court trial in September 1989.

     If the trial court's in the distant state had provided fair and impartial adjudications, the litigation process could have been completed properly in 1989.  If the first circuit court judge in 1993 had provided a fair and impartial judicial forum, the litigation process could have been completed in 1993.

     If the successor circuit court judge in 1993 had provided a fair and impartial judicial forum in 1993, the litigation process could have been completed in 1993 or 1994.  The second circuit court judge was so unfair, so unethical, and so disgustingly corrupt that he totally destroyed defendant Lonnie  Willoughby's opportunity to defend himself pro se in further litigation in the circuit court. 

     Remember that the first circuit court judge (1993) issued an extremely unfair and unethical and corrupt order that improperly dismissed defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's counterclaim complaint against the plaintiff law firm, although Lon Jr. had presented three on-point appellate court decisions that showed clearly that the statute of limitations had not expired when defendant Lon Willoughby filed his counterclaim pleadings against the plaintiff law firm and its corrupt "defense attorney."

     Visitors to this department can see how unfair, unethical, and corrupt the entire litigation processes had been for Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., from the first trial in September 1989 to the litigation actions conducted before two extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt circuit court judges in 1993, and then the unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions involving the county court judge in 1994.  Those unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions continued in a malicious and ruthless manner until Lon Willoughby, Jr. finally refused to litigate in their corrupt courts any further.

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. filed and prosecuted pro se (without attorney assistance) more than ten appeal cases during that extended 20+ years series of unfair and unethical litigation schemes and tactics.  The appellate court judges typically "cooperated" in any way that they could with the unfair trial court schemes and tactics involved, and they also cooperated in any way possible with the unfair and unethical appeal court schemes and tactics used by the attorneys in Lon's multiple appeal cases.  

     Lon Jr. should have won all of his appeals, but the corrupt self-serving judicial system only "allowed" him to win two of his many appeal cases.  Those wins made no difference at all because the trial court routinely continued with their unfair and unethical judicial actions against defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. when the appeal case jurisdiction was transferred back to the trial court's jurisdiction for further adjudication (more litigation actions). 

     Several of Lon's appeal briefs requested that the appellate court judges take responsible actions to help initiate appropriate criminal investigations of the judicial criminal actions involved (exposed clearly in Lon's appeal brief argument issues with official court record documents to prove his allegations convincingly).  However, the appellate court judges repeatedly refused to take those appropriate judicial actions - so no responsible judicial actions were taken that might help stop such unfair, unethical, and outrageously fraudulent judicial actions in the trial court (in the distant state). 

     Lon's 20+ years of litigation actions usually encountered an appalling and disgusting display of outrageously corrupt judicial actions, schemes, and tactics, and those complex litigation actions continued for many years of related litigation actions. 

     Finally, out-of-state litigant Lonnie Willoughby refused to litigate anymore in their extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt courts (circuit court and county court trial courts) and their corrupt appellate court system.  At that point in time, it was very clear to Lon Jr. that the judicial system was so unfair, so unethical, and so corrupt that there was no hope left in continuing to seek a fair and impartial judicial forum in their extremely corrupt self-serving judicial system courts.

     No law enforcement officers anywhere (neither state officers nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation - FBI) would even consider attempting to initiate a responsible investigation of Lon Jr's very responsible and well-documented complaints about extremely unfair, unethical, criminal-minded litigation actions by local attorneys and local judges in the distant state (outrageously corrupt, collusive conspiratorial judicial actions - involving some local attorneys and trial court judges). 

     None of the law enforcement personnel would even look at Lonnie Willoughby's very responsible documentary evidence that strongly supported his valid complaints.  In essence, all law enforcement departments and all law enforcement agents/officers that Lonnie communicated with about these issues over a period of several years, effectively ignored his very responsible and well-documented complaints.  (state law enforcement officers and the Federal Bureau of Investigation)    

     It eventually became an obvious foregone conclusion that law enforcement personnel would not even consider initiating a criminal type investigation of Lonnie Willoughby Jr's complaints about members of the legal profession (attorneys and local trial court judges) conducting trial court litigation actions in unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded collusive corrupt ways to achieve their self-serving objectives.  Lon could see that members of the "legal profession" were automatically treated by all law enforcement personnel as though they were above the laws that apply to all other American citizens

     All law enforcement officers that Lonnie Willoughby Jr. communicated with about those extremely unfair and unethical criminal-minded actions treated the outrageously unfair and unethical corrupt members of the legal profession as the elitist untouchables!!!  (state law enforcement agencies and the FBI did that repeatedly) 

     Lon communicated with the FBI in the distant state twice and the US Attorney in that area of the distant state once.  He also communicated with the FBI located in Greenville, SC and communicated with the FBI's state headquarters in Columbia, SC.  

     None of the FBI agents had any responsible interest in evaluating his complaints about unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt attorneys and judges in the distant state.  The U.S. Attorney simply referred him to talk with the FBI about his complaints.  In essence, nothing was done about any of his very serious and well documented complaints about very serious criminal-minded judicial actions - that were wrecking his life.

+  +  +  +  +

Consequence of Extremely Unfair, Unethical Litigation Actions

     In the Christian-oriented and patriotic-minded world that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. chooses to live in with integrity in America, there are very serious consequences for conducting extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt actions by "officers of the judicial systems" or by agents and officers of law enforcement systems (state or federal).

     As founder and president of ABC's of Health, Inc., Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. will not allow any of the many millions of excluded people (legal/judicial profession and law enforcement profession - members, family relatives, and employee personnel) to review and benefit from lesson two through lesson six of the Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts Educational Program that Lon and Janie (wife) Willoughby developed and published at this very important natural healthcare and wellness concepts educational Website.   Those people will also not be allowed to lease any of the advanced natural healthcare and wellness home-study education programs that Lon and Janie are developing.

     Lon Willoughby has researched many of the most important natural healthcare and wellness concepts that have been developed and published in America during the last 80 years.  Unfortunately,  American citizens will continue to die prematurely by the hundreds of thousands each year without the remarkable natural healthcare and wellness benefits that could be provided with the advanced natural healthcare and wellness concepts that Lon Willoughby has discovered, developed, and copyrighted for use in our corporate education programs for our "qualified visitors" and "qualified education clients." 

     The 15,000+ hours that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had to spend defending himself from the corrupt litigation action schemes reported briefly above severely interfered with the development and promotion of our advanced natural healthcare and wellness concepts classroom education program.

     Those litigation actions also severely interfered with the development of our advanced natural healthcare and wellness concepts home-study education programs.  They would have been completed several years ago without that interference, and they could have been helping improve the lives of many "qualified" American natural born citizens each year. 

     Our education programs could have already helped extend the lives of thousands of American citizens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of good christian-oriented and patriotic minded American citizens.  As we have shown herein, the judicial systems and law enforcement systems are designed and operated to be as self-serving as the people within the systems want them to be. 


Corrupt Courts and Corrupt Law Enforcement Actions

     Unfortunately, as Lon Willoughby's diligent responsible actions over 20+ years have shown, there is literally nothing that an individual citizen can do about the unfair, unethical, criminal-minded self-serving actions that are routinely used by the people who have authority to exercise responsible controls over these government (state and federal) judicial systems and law enforcement systems.

     Consequently, Lon and Janie Willoughby do not travel anywhere in America outside of their home state of South Carolina, and they typically do not travel outside of their home county within the state. 

     If they are going to get involved in any litigation, they want to make sure that it will occur in their home county (Greenville County in South Carolina).  They recommend that you responsibly consider their reasons for taking those responsible actions, as explained herein.

     After 20+ years of ongoing related litigation actions in a distant state (initially related to Lon's deceased father's trust estate management), with more than ten appeal cases, and then litigation initiated by Lon in the federal court system in the distant state, and an appeal in the federal court system that Lon took all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, Lon Willoughby finally had no confidence at all in the hope for fairness and impartiality of judges in America (or anywhere else on Planet Earth for that matter). 

     Lon had learned that American trial court judges and appellate court judges can be just as dishonest and unfair and unethical as any ordinary human can be, and it is foolish to trust any of them to be fair minded and ethical when one is exposing unfair, unethical actions by members of the legal profession.

     It is relevant to note here that in a recent polling of Americans about their confidence in the American judicial systems, only 21% of those polled expressed confidence in our judicial systems.  If  that 21% had more than fifteen thousands of hours of experience trying to cope with unfair and unethical self-serving trial attorneys, trial court judges, and appellate court judges, as Lon Willoughby has, the confidence level would quickly approach 0% confidence - where Lon's confidence is at today.

     From Lon's experiences as reported herein, it is easy to understand why Lon Willoughby has 0% confidence in the fairness and impartiality of the American judicial systems - whenever there are issues involved in a case that can affect the "legal brotherhood" in a self-serving manner.  In litigation actions that do not involve any benefits to any members of the legal brotherhood, there is a much better chance that one might actually get a reasonable fair and impartial judicial forum to litigate complaints or to defend against complaints.  However, there are many judicial situations where benefits to some member or members of the "legal brotherhood" might be involved.     

     Lon knows from a lot of experience that those cases will very likely be resolved in the manner that is self-serving for members of the legal brotherhood, irrespective of the relevant legal issues or factual issues and the evidence available for presentation in the case.  In other words, Lon understands that American courts can be extremely self-serving and disgustingly corrupt for benefits to members of the legal brotherhood

     Sometimes, a "local" judge might be more favorable to one attorney involved in a litigation process than the judge is toward the other opposing attorney.  Unfortunately, In those situations, the Final Judgment for that case will not likely be provided in a fair and impartial manner by a biased judge.

     If you feel that Lon has exaggerated any of these issues, please understand that the situations reported herein were much worse that what is reported herein.  There are no words that can accurately tell you how bad those litigation situations were.  Lon has reported just a small part of the bad situations that he has had to contend with because of unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorneys and unfair, unethical, and corrupt judges.

     Lon went through 20+ years of living hell trying to cope with attorneys and judges who knew that they could do anything unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt to him that they wanted to do in their malicious and ruthless sadistic efforts to wreck his life, destroy his business in Greenville County, South Carolina, destroy his reputation with his family members.  They clearly tried to destroy his health and his life if possible. 

     Corrupt attorneys and judges have caused enough stress for Lon Jr. to kill five strong men, but Lon is still here working and fighting at age 82 when several of his attorney or judge adversaries are dead - some by more that 15 years ago. 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. is still here and still able and capable of opposing and exposing unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt judicial actions because he is a very competent natural healthcare and wellness concepts consultant and educator.  He has learned a lot about very important and very valuable natural healthcare and wellness concepts that attorneys and judges are not knowledgeable about.  

     Yes, "they" got away with all of those grossly unfair and unethical judicial actions against Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. because the judicial systems can be extremely unfair and unethical in multiple outrageously corrupt self-serving and selfish ways that can be very beneficial to some members of the "elitist legal brotherhood." 

     Non-resident litigant Lon Willoughby, Jr. learned that trial attorneys and trial court judges can easily ignore their own State Bar Association ethics standards during a litigation process and get away with it; they can easily ignore and violate important civil rights of litigants that are clearly protected by the State Constitution and get away with it; they can easily ignore and violate important civil rights of litigants that are protected by the State's State Statutory Laws and get away with it; and they (trial attorneys and trial court judges) can even ignore and violate important civil rights of litigants that are  protected by the Constitution of the United States and get away with it. 

      Why is all of that possible and even likely in some unfair, unethical, and self-serving type litigation processes in America (the USA)?  Because all of those litigation processes are fundamentally based on trust of human behavior of the trial attorneys and trial judges involved and the appellate court judges involved - expecting and hoping that they will always be reasonably fair and honest in all litigation actions and processes. 

     Unfortunately, members of the legal profession, the "legal brotherhood" (attorneys, lawyers, and judges), have developed and designed the judicial systems in the USA (state systems and the federal system) so they have total control of the litigation processes and so they also have total control the appellate court processes, and so they also have ultimate control of the highest levels of the law enforcement systems and processes. 

     Lon Willoughby eventually learned during years of litigation actions that trial attorneys and trial court judges and appellate court judges are typically well trained and skilled deceivers, liars, and twisters of truth who eventually have no reasonable ethics remaining in them - whenever issues are involved in litigation processes that can be beneficial and self-serving in selfish ways for some members of the "legal brotherhood."

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. learned that their allegiance and loyalty to the "legal brotherhood" was paramount; he saw numerous times that it was much more important to them than their allegiance and loyalty to their State Bar Ethics Standards, or their allegiance and loyalty to their State's Statutory Laws or their State Constitution.  Their allegiance and loyalty to the "legal brotherhood" was also much more important to them than their allegiance and loyalty to the Constitution of the United States of America. 

     In other words, Lon Willoughby, Jr. learned that attorneys, lawyers, and judges at all levels of the judicial system(s), from the bottom level to the U.S. Supreme Court, had been "brainwashed" to be loyal to the "legal brotherhood" above all other allegiances. 

     That self-serving dominant allegiance and loyalty is why attorneys, lawyers, and judges at all levels of the judicial systems in the USA cannot be trusted to be fair, ethical, and impartial human beings in any situation where benefits to the "legal brotherhood" are involved in a litigation action or judicial decision. 

     After their very effective law school "brainwashing" and then years of working in an extremely selfish and self-serving judicial system, it is unlikely that any of them will have sufficient honesty and integrity left in them to overcome their dominant brainwashed sense of allegiance and loyalty to the "legal brotherhood."      

    Proof of these responsible assertions is the fact that in the 20+ years of extremely unfair and unethical litigation schemes and tactics that attorneys and multiple judges in the distant state forced upon non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., no fair and responsible investigation was made about his complaints.

     Like disgustingly corrupt despots and tyrants, they did not have the little bit of honesty and integrity to initiate a single fair-minded responsible investigation of any kind - even when a lot of those extremely unfair and unethical criminal-minded schemes, tactics, and judicial actions were exposed in substantial detail in numerous appeals that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. responsibly developed and prosecuted pro se (without any attorney assistance).  The official "Record on Appeal" in multiple appeals proved that his serious complaints about unfair and unethical judicial actions below were valid complaints.

     Please understand that the judicial systems in America can be so unfair, so unethical, and so disgustingly corrupt that a severely abused, harassed, persecuted, and maliciously and ruthlessly punished litigant cannot find any trial attorney (or trial lawyer) to represent them honestly with integrity in a courageous manner that would responsible seek a fair and just outcome for the case. 

     They cannot report unfair and unethical corrupt judicial actions on appeal in an honest manner without being punished.  Any experienced attorney/lawyer would know that if they provided fair and ethical responsible legal representation in a courageous manner, they would very likely be punished severely by the judicial powers in control of their state license (the State Supreme Court).  They would very likely lose their license to practice law in that state. 

     Furthermore, they would also likely be blackballed in the legal profession to such an extent that they would not be able to get a license to practice law anywhere in the USA.  That situation is a very important illustration of how disgustingly selfish, self-serving, and outrageously corrupt the judicial systems in America actually can be at any time.

     Those situations were shown when Appellant Lon Willoughby had to contend with having one of his initial appeal briefs stricken completely by the appellate court in the distant state.  The appellate court judges ordered him to resubmit the initial appeal brief without making any criticism of attorney actions or judicial actions that had been taken against him in the trial court litigation below.  What is the purpose of an appeal that cannot report the unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt actions in the court below?

     When appellant Lon Willoughby promptly and timely revised his initial appeal brief and resubmitted the appeal brief, the appellate court again struck major argument issues in his revised initial appeal brief.  The appellant court judges refused to consider any responsible adjudication of the very important stricken argument issues in that initial appeal brief. 

     The appellate judges made it very clear to Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. that they had no interest in hearing about the unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial actions that had been taken against him in the trial court below.  That occurred even though the official "record on appeal" (original documents from the trial court records) showed conclusively that Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. was telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. 

     The "self-serving" appellate court judges had stricken those Initial Brief appeal arguments before the appellate judges had made a review of the "record on appeal documents" that supported Appellant Lon Willoughby Jr's appeal brief argument issues. 

     You need to understand that the legal profession and the judicial systems are so self-serving that if a trial court litigation attorney or a trial court judge is extremely unfair, unethical, and obviously corrupt in the litigation process, the appellant must treat them as honorable "officers of the court" who simply had a little error or mistake in judgment. 

     It is forbidden to tell the truth, the real whole truth, in an appeal brief about their extremely dishonest and disgustingly corrupt litigation schemes and tactics.  That is not the gentlemanly thing to do with people who are supposed to be honorable and honest "officers of the court." The appellate court judges had no interest in reviewing the sordid truth about what actually happened in the litigation processes in the trial court below.

     In Lon Jr's appeal, the appellate court judges refused to take any actions that would help start an investigation of extremely unfair, unethical and outrageously corrupt judicial actions, as Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. specifically requested that they do. 

     Consequently, there was no responsible investigation of any kind about appellate Lon Willoughby's courageous, honest, and responsible complaints appeal brief report to the appellate court judges (a three judge panel).  Therefore, there was no prosecution or punishment of any kind for the unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorney actions and the "cooperative" unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions that caused Lon Willoughby, Jr. to timely file an appeal about those unfair, unethical corrupt judicial actions. 

    Lon Willoughby learned that the entire judicial system is basically a heinous self-serving fraud upon the public.  The fraudulent self-serving judicial system is essentially funded primarily by taxpayer funds, and it is a disgusting fraud upon the public at large.  Lon believes it is one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated upon the American people.

    After those extremely unfair and unethical judicial actions occurred in 1989, Lon Jr. traveled to the state capital and met with the chief of staff for the attorney general.  Lon explained that he was there to file a criminal actions report about a circuit court judge. 

     Lon had brought a medium size cardboard box with him (in his lap) that contained photo copies of many official litigation records from the circuit court litigation that had occurred in September 1989 (more than 100 miles away from the state capitol).  

     Without hearing anything else, the chief of staff for the attorney general quickly stated "If you file a criminal action report about one of our circuit court judges, I can tell you what is likely to happen.  We will defend him and prosecute you."

     He went on to say that the attorney general did not have jurisdiction to prosecute a circuit court judge in that distant area of the state.  That prosecutorial jurisdiction would be with the state's prosecuting attorney for that district of the state. 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. then explained that he had visited that office prior to coming to see the attorney general.  The prosecutor's office personnel had told Lon that he would need to file that type of criminal complaint (about a circuit court judge) with the attorney general.  He explained that they were wrong about that issue.

     He made no inquiry about Lon's complaint issues, and it was now very obvious that the attorney that Lon was talking to had no interest in learning anything about Lon's complaints about the judge.  The meeting was ended abruptly and a very disappointed and frustrated Lon Willoughby departed the office to go to the governor's office - in the same building.

     He met with one of the attorney's on the governor's staff and talked with him for more than 30 minutes.  To summarize that meeting, Lon was told that the state had separation of powers for the executive, judicial, and legislative divisions of government, and the governor could not do anything about actions that take place withing the judicial division.

     Lon knew that the State Constitution specifically gave the governor authority and power to be the chief law enforcement officer for the state, and the Constitution also established an attorney general to help enable the governor to carry out those duties.  A very disappointed, frustrated, and discouraged Lon Willoughby departed the capital city to begin his more than 500 mile trip back to his home in Mauldin, South Carolina.

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. subsequently prepared a detailed written report about some of those unfair and unethical corrupt judicial actions, and he mailed a copy of that report to the governor of the distant state and also mailed a copy to the attorney general. 

     Some weeks later, Lon received a call from the distant state.  One of the attorney's on the governor's staff called Lon to ask him what he wanted the governor to do about the complaints that he had presented in his detailed report.  Lon explained that he wanted the governor to initiate an investigation about his complaints.  The attorney stated that an investigation was not likely to occur and he abruptly ended the conversation.

     The governor and the attorney general both failed (or refused) to initiate a criminal actions type investigation about Lon Jr's detailed written complaints that reported some of those outrageously unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     Lon Willoughby did not have any further communications with either office (governor or attorney general) so it was presumed that neither the governor nor the attorney general took any actions to investigate Lon Willoughby, Jr's valid, well documented, honest and courageous report.  That governor subsequently died a few years later - that was many years ago.

   The "defense attorney" who betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in September 1989 died in December 2000.  The circuit court judge who presided over that disgustingly corrupt "equity court" ambush complaints scheme adjudication in September 1989 also died many years ago. 


Do Unfair, Unethical, and Corrupt Judicial Actions Occur in Other States?

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. believes that unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt litigation actions and judicial actions also occur in other states.  He knows for a fact that they do occur in some other states because he has had litigation experiences in the trial courts and appellate courts of South Carolina.  He found the same types of "elitist" mentality among trial attorneys, trial court judges, and also with appellate court judges. 

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., as president of ABC's of Health, Inc. had to take a litigation action in the circuit court (Court of Common Pleas) to the Supreme Court of South Carolina due to unfair, unethical, and extremely despotic circuit court judicial actions. 

     It took about three years to complete that appeal litigation process due to all the unfair, unethical, self-serving maneuvering tactics that went on with the Supreme Court's improper attempt to transfer the appeal down to the appellate court's jurisdiction.  Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's finally won those jurisdictional arguments, and he got his appeal reinstated in the state's Supreme Court - where he eventually won the case. 

     His appeal brief strongly moved (requested) the high court to remove the circuit court judge - take him off the bench - due to the extremely unfair, unethical, and outright despotic judicial actions that he took in an extremely "elitist" manner against Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. who was representing his company with his defensive pro se actions. 

     Before the appeal case was completed, the circuit court judge was removed from the bench.  He is no longer a judge, and he is back to practicing law as an attorney. 

     Did Lon's detailed appeal brief argument issues and his trial court transcript record of those courtroom despotic and dictatorial judicial actions have any bearing on the judge's removal?  Lon will likely never know the answer to that question, but he believes that his very good appeal brief report to the South Carolina Supreme Court and his transcript record of those unfair, unethical, despotic, and dictatorial judicial actions had something important to do with the removal of that extremely "elitist-minded" despotic judge.

  

Conclusion of this Very Important Department


     Due to his extensive litigation experiences, Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. is confident that unfair, unethical, and self-serving despotic and dictatorial judicial actions likely occur frequently throughout the judicial systems in the USA - especially so whenever benefits to the "legal brotherhood" may be involved in the outcome of litigation actions.  

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. has shown herein that the judicial systems in America have a terrible "conflict of interest" situation to contend with whenever a litigant is abused in the trial court litigation and then timely appeals the unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions taken against the litigant by "cooperative" trial attorneys and trial court judge. 

     It should now be clear to visitors to this department's report that the appellate court judges do not want to hear about the unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions that occurred in the trial court below.  They do not want to admit in their appellate court written decision that the trial attorneys involved did anything wrong, and they certainly do not want to report that some of those improper actions were criminal-minded actions.

     The same situation applies to the trial court judge.  The appellate court judges do not want to have to admit that the trial court judge did anything wrong that was a serious offense of denial of a fair and impartial judicial forum.  They do not want to admit and report that the trial court judge committed criminal acts regarding a denial of justice.

     The appellate court judges do not want to have to admit that an unfair, unethical, and corrupt defense attorney obviously committed legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud against his client - such as occurred with Lon Willoughby, Jr's situation in 1989. 

     The appellate court judges will not provide a fair and impartial decision for such  appeal complaints because they are always looking for ways to protect a member of the "legal brotherhood" from complaints by an abused, persecuted, and punished client. 

     The appellant's own attorney on appeal has a similar "conflict of interest" because that attorney will also look for ways to defend and protect any members of the "legal brotherhood."  Consequently, the appellant is caught up in a judicial system situation where the judicial deck is stacked against him or her to an extreme level of conflict. 

     Lon Willoughby has shown herein that the judicial system is not capable of providing fair and impartial justice if there is any complaint about unfair and unethical attorney trial court schemes and tactics or about unfair, unethical "cooperative" actions by the trial court judge that resulted in an unfair, unethical Final Judgment

     As Lon Willoughby, Jr. learned with numerous appeal cases, the appellate court judges will frequently sweep all of the judicial corruption away by providing an Affirmed, Per Curium appeal decision that deliberately fails to provide a written opinion about the legal issues involved in the case.  Just take the easy way out and refuse to write a legal opinion for the case.  Do not tell the appellant why the appellate court judges (typically a three judge panel) rejected all of the appellant's argument issues (that reported the specific improper, or unethical, or corrupt judicial actions taken in the trial court below). 

     So you see the terrible "conflict of interest" that is built right into the appeal process. The appellate court judges are much more interested in trying to make everything look good for the attorneys, lawyers, and judges involved in the litigation process than they are about finding truth and justice for the appellant's complaint issues on appeal. 

     Now you understand why our Terms of Use Conditions are written the way they are regarding our restrictions of sharing our special natural healthcare and wellness concepts education with members of the legal profession and the law enforcement professions in the USA.  They have very restricted access to our confidential and secret copyrighted and proprietary natural healthcare and wellness concepts education.

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. will not allow our company to help educate self-appointed "elitist" arrogant attorneys, lawyer, or judges or the self-serving law enforcement officers and other associated people who effectively help all of the "elitist" Americans continue operating unimpeded and unrestricted with their unfair, unethical, and corrupt selfish and self-serving judicial system practices.

     May you live long and prosper well as a healthy patriotic-minded American,


     Lon Willoughby, Jr., founder and president of ABC's of Health, Inc., dba ABC of Health 

     
      P.S. NOTES:   Lon is at age 82.  Will you help him spread the word about this very important Website to responsible American citizens within your "circle of influence?"  He has already done the very complex and very difficult work for you.  All you need to do is simply encourage responsible and patriotic-minded American citizens to visit this Website.  Be sure to provide a note that encourages them to visit this "Judicial Corruption Exposed" department.  They need to review this information.
  
     Best time ever:  This is the best time in mankind's history to expose the extreme judicial corruption reported herein.  We have big advantages that are very important - easy Internet access for education of most American adults (with this Website); E-mail systems that enable people to communicate with each other quickly, easily, and inexpensively; telephone system communications that are also inexpensive (usually with long-distance calls at no additional charges); Internet social media services that can help spread the word about important information quickly and easily at little cost.  

     Visitors to this Website can easily help Lon and Janie Willoughby spread the word with this very important Website's information.  We need your help to spread the word far and wide quickly. 

     Will you take a little time to get on board this vital education project so we can help build a better and much safer future for our children, our grandchildren, our great grandchildren, and all future American citizens? 

     Send Lon an E-mail and let him know that you appreciate the very difficult work that he has done in developing this large educational Website.  Let him know that you are helping spread the word about our Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts education and our education about an extremely corrupt self-serving judicial system that needs major improvements as soon as possible (ASAP). 

     Public awareness by American citizens is vital in both of these very important education projects.

     Thank you for your generous help.  Lon and Janie Willoughby will truly appreciate your efforts.



Helpful Brief Overview of

Our Natural Healthcare Education Services

IMPORTANT NOTES:  The introductory paragraphs below provide a quick summary of the very important and very valuable natural healthcare education services that we offer selected clients.  Similar introductory information is presented in some other departments of this Website because key words are contained herein that help Internet Search Engines work better with our complex Website.

After you have read this helpful information one time, you can simply scroll down past these paragraphs when you visit other departments that contain similar introductory information.   

Natural Healthcare Education Services:  This Website contains some special natural healthcare concepts that are Free (to most visitors to help them improve their lifestyles - if they agree to comply responsibly with our Copyright Information Department Conditions and our Terms of Use Conditions).

We also offer natural healthcare consultations by telephone for people living in South Carolina within a 50 miles radius of Greenville, South Carolina. (very reasonable fee structure)  We can conduct very convenient telephone consultations that can be helpful to individuals or married couples or families with some teenage children.  

We can educate these type clients quickly about relevant natural healthcare concepts that may be very helpful about specific healthcare issues.  Younger children can learn from their educated parents.

Telephone consultation services offer the big advantage of being a fast and convenient way for our clients to obtain some very important alternative and complementary natural health care concepts information that can be directed to specific health care issues, and they can obtain that very valuable health care concepts information at a very reasonable cost (using a credit card for payment).

Our company is currently developing very important and valuable Advanced Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts Home-study Education Programs for natural born American citizens who are also residents (citizens) of South Carolina and live in the upstate area with a permanent residence Zip Code of 296 _ _ .   

Our Advanced Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts Home-study Education Programs will enable us to provide much more comprehensive natural healthcare and wellness concepts education to our "qualified education clients."   One of these education programs can be exceptionally beneficial to said clients regarding a broad range of very important natural healthcare and wellness concepts

One of our natural healthcare and wellness concepts education programs can be much more effective over time, to an individual or a married couple or a family, than many hours of our personalized telephone consultation services can provide.

The proprietary copyrighted natural healthcare and wellness concepts that we will teach in each home-study education program can educate our "qualified clients" about our very important and very valuable advanced natural healthcare and wellness concepts.  We know how to teach these very  important and very valuable natural healthcare concepts in ways that are easy to understand and easy to learn and also easy to use for improving a qualified education client's lifestyle in remarkable ways.

Our very important advanced natural healthcare and wellness concepts home-study education programs will be available only from our company because we will have tightly controlled leasing distribution of these education programs (we own numerous copyrights that will be taught in our top secret education programs) For those reasons, we are the only company that will be authorized to teach our advanced natural healthcare and wellness concepts corporate trade secrets

ABC of Health has multiple Websites that present very important natural healthcare and wellness concepts about various subjects such as:  healthcare consultations, health care concepts consultations, health classes, health care classes, health care concepts education programs, vitamins, minerals, herbs, enzymes, nutraceuticals, probiotics, proteins, etc. 

Lon Willoughby is also knowledgeable about quality air filters, air purifiers, water filters, bathing water filters (bath tub filters and shower filters), water purifiers, water alkalizers, water ionizers, CHI exercisers, quality-built rebounder type exercisers, and Far-infrared (FIR) portable Saunas. 

The relevant healthcare products and services listed above illustrate the broad range of health issues that our resident natural healthcare consultant, nutrition consultant, and healthy lifestyle coach is knowledgeable about.  (Lon Willoughby) 

Lon has acquired specialized natural healthcare concepts education and experience with many important health-promoting products and alternative health and complementary health natural healthcare concepts, protocols, and services.

(natural healthcare = healthcare without prescription type drugs)



Helpful Information For You

This website is viewed best with Arial Font - Medium Size (10). You may be able to select parameters on your browser by using View (set text size) and Tools (Internet Options - select Font and then select the font Size).

Our Contact ABC of Health department provides a convenient E-mail Form that make it very easy to send a quick E-mail communications to ABC of Health.    Please title your Subject line in the manner suggested.  

If you are a visitor with ABC of Health and you appreciate the very important and valuable natural healthcare and wellness concepts presented at this Website, It will be helpful to us if you will take a few moments to visit our Comments and Reviews department and provide your comments about how our natural healthcare and wellness concepts educational information has been helpful to you.  We like to hear from our visitors.  

Your Visitor's Email can simply express how you feel about our dedicated efforts to help visitors learn some important and valuable natural healthcare concepts that will enable them to begin taking better care of their natural healthcare assets and benefit from their actions for the rest of their life. 

If you have been a customer or client in our unique Health and Wellness Store or our Natural Healthcare Concepts Education Business, it will be helpful if you will take a few minutes to express your feelings about the way we served your healthcare concerns and interests by using the convenient E-mail Form provided in our Comments and Reviews department

Your constructive comments about us could be very helpful to visitors who are trying to evaluate our credibility and trust-worthiness as natural healthcare concepts educators.