Judicial Corruption Exposed For All To See Clearly

Report by Lonnie Willoughby at ABC of Health


Why Do We Report Judicial Corruption Issues At This Website?


     Reviewing the judicial corruption reported herein can help American citizens understand why Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., as president of ABC's of Health, Inc., imposed serious access restrictions on our natural healthcare and wellness concepts education for two specific professions in America. 

     A lot of the Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts education presented at this Website is not available to members of the legal profession or various law enforcement professions in America.  Those situations are explained briefly in our Terms of Use department.  We will explain our reasons for taking those restrictive access actions in more detail in this very important department.

     This special information can help visitors develop a much better understanding of how the judicial systems in America actually work - typically in a very selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic manner that  keeps the money machine working well for local attorneys, lawyers, and the court systems.  It is very important for responsible American adult citizens to review this report. 

     Visitors will learn that the judicial systems in America are primarily about money, power, and autocratic despotic and tyrannical control over the general public with a little bit of fairness and justice sprinkled in here and there to make the judicial systems appear to be working well for American citizens.  However, as shown herein, they can easily be extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt in selfish self-serving autocratic despotic and tyrannical ways for litigants

     Visitors will learn that the judicial systems in America usually work well for members of America's arrogant, pompous, aristocratic autocratic "elitist" despotic and tyrannical legal profession - the "legal brotherhood."  Admittedly, the judicial systems in America do manage to accomplish some responsible actions for some Americans (in expensive money grabbing ways), but the judicial systems frequently operate in very arrogant, pompous, "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical ways that are very self-serving for members of the "legal brotherhood."  (Self-serving in these situations means providing various kinds of special benefits to attorneys/lawyers and/or judges routinely, as if they were aristocratically entitled to special benefits as elitist citizens; we will identify them collectively herein as "them" or "they.")

     NOTE:  The terms attorney and lawyer in this report mean the same thing - one who is licensed to practice law in the legal profession. There are many specialties in the practice of law and many attorneys or lawyers are not active in practicing as a trial court attorney - one who routinely represents clients in either civil or criminal litigation proceedings that usually involve some type of trial court proceeding.  In this report, we will be talking about trial court attorneys and trial court judges or appellate court attorneys and appellate court judges.

     However, visitors need to understand that many attorneys practice in specialized areas of the law such as:  bankruptcy law, civil rights law, family practice law, employment and labor law, IRS problems law, real estate law, social security and disability law, trademark and copyright law, etc.

     The author of this special report is not an attorney/lawyer; however, he has actively participated in the judicial systems in America a lot more than an average citizen.  He has spent more than 18,000 hours of his life involved with numerous litigation actions in America.  That is equivalent to working 40 hours per week for more than eight very difficult and very frustrating years

     Lon Willoughby will report herein very important litigation education that no attorney/lawyer and no trial court judge will likely ever share with the America public.  Lon would not have been forced into many years of very expensive defensive litigation actions, that literally wrecked his life for 20+ years, if his very intelligent and highly skilled "defense attorney" had made one easy competent and responsible 30 seconds objection to surprise complaints being introduced into a trial on 9/8/1989

     Think about that situation for a few moments - 30 seconds of one very easy competent defense attorney objection during trial could have totally eliminated the 20+ years of litigation involvement that resulted due to that deliberate "objection failure."

     This revealing report will explain why that unfair, unethical, and corrupt "defense attorney" willfully betrayed his client (defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.) during a one-day non-jury trial on that fateful day by willfully "cooperating" with the plaintiff's attorney's deceitful, unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded "ambush complaints scheme" and also explain why the unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt circuit court judge willfully "cooperated" with that ambush complaints scheme.

     This department presents vital protective information that every responsible freedom-loving  patriotic-minded American adult citizen needs to review as soon as possible (ASAP).

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., the founder and president of ABC's of Health, Inc., doing business as (dba) ABC of Health, has personally litigated in state county courts, state circuit courts, and state appellate courts.  He has also litigated in the federal circuit court and the federal appellate court.  Most of those litigation actions were taken in his pro se capacity (acting as his own attorney - proceeding without professional attorney legal assistance in a litigation case). 

     Lonnie (Lon) chose to litigate pro se (being his own attorney) after the first two attorneys that he hired (1989 and 1990) knowingly and willfully betrayed him in litigation actions in an extremely dishonest and unethical manner.  The first attorney betrayed Lon in a very important but easy to win trial court litigation.  The second attorney betrayed Lon in the resultant appeal that occurred after that unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt trial court litigation.  We will report both of those extremely unfair, unethical, and deceitfully corrupt betrayal actions in this very special report

     Visitors will learn why it is fairly common practice for clients to be deceitfully betrayed by their "trusted" attorney during litigation actions.  Visitors will also see how easy it is for their "trusted" attorney to betray them during a trial court proceeding or in an appellate court proceeding

     Visitors will learn that trial attorneys/lawyers and trial court judges, and also appellate court judges, can have other self-serving interests in the outcome of a litigation process that are frequently much more important to "them" than responsibly searching for truth and providing fairness and justice.

     Lon Willoughby has filed and prosecuted more than ten appeal cases, and he took two of his appeal cases all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.  That is a complex, difficult, and expensive legal project.  Most trial attorneys in America will never file an appeal case in the high court. 

     Visitors will learn that there are some important reasons why most trial attorneys in America will not attempt to present a complex, difficult, and expensive appeal case to the U.S. Supreme Court

    

Why Should You Carefully Review This Information?

      It is in your best interest to take time to carefully review this exceptionally important and interesting report about unfair, unethical, criminal-minded "elitist" self-serving judicial corruption in American courts - trial courts and appellate courts (state and federal) - all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court

    Stay with us in this incredibly important Judicial Corruption Exposed Report, and you will learn some very important information that may be very helpful to you in the future.

     Many Americans already believe that the judicial systems in America do not generally operate in a fair and impartial manner for ordinary citizens, but they do not realize how extremely unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt the judicial systems anywhere in America can be.  We will expose that herein.

     Visitors will also learn why they (attorneys and judges) find it beneficial for their profession to conduct litigation in unfair and unethical ways.  Visitors will also learn why they can get away with extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving actions any time they choose to operate that way. 

     We will expose several extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical judicial actions in this special report so visitors can see clearly how easy it is for attorneys/lawyers and judges (at all levels - state and federal trial courts and appellate court) to be extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt during civil or criminal litigation. 


The Two Major Parts To This Report

     The first part of this report provides a comprehensive overview of what visitors will learn in this report.  The second part of this report will provide specific examples of unfair, unethical, deceitful, fraudulent, and/or disgustingly corrupt "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical judicial actions.  Many visitors will be surprised to learn about the appalling and disgusting level of "elitist" selfish self-serving corruption that appears to be fairly common practice in many American courts (trial courts and appellate courts).

     Most Americans will likely be surprised to learn that there are many countries that have better (less corrupt) judicial systems than the judicial systems in the USAMore than sixty countries were investigated, evaluated, and reported responsibly in a very important publication in year 2007 with the title:  Global Corruption Report 2007 - Corruption in Judicial Systems

     The complex data collection for the book's premise was compiled by an international organization titled Transparency International (legal professionals, scholars, and civil society activists - data compilation work by a broad based worldwide membership). 

     This very important book was published in the United Kingdom by the Cambridge University Press, and it is available for purchase at Amazon.com for about $10.00. The book provides revealing information about judicial corruption problems in 60+ countries. 

     Their important investigations found judicial corruption problems in all countries that were evaluated, but some countries had much less perceived corruption than other countries.  The USA was not among the 30 least corrupted judicial systems.  More than 30 countries appear to have less perceived judicial corruption problems than the USA.

     We bring this to your attention at this early point in this very special report about Judicial Corruption in American Courts to show that the extremely serious judicial corruption situations that are exposed clearly in this report are not just a few isolated situations.  We will expose very serious unfair and unethical selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic judicial corruption that appears to be common practice in American courts - anytime "they" choose to operate this way (which may be often).

     Later in this report, we will also refer visitors to another publication that is even more important for all American adults; this very special judicial corruption expose' book should be read by every responsible American adult citizen ASAP.  The book was written by a former Assistant U.S. Attorney with many years of attorney experience. 

     NOTE:  U.S. Attorneys are appointed to operate in all states throughout America, and they work closely with the Federal Bureau of Investigations (the FBI) to provide the prosecution actions for alleged criminal activities that appear to have violated one or more federal criminal law statutes.   The FBI personnel investigate and procure evidence for the prosecutors, and the prosecutors then decide whether or not they have sufficient evidence to proceed with a prosecutorial criminal type trial court litigation action.   

     Published in 2014, the book referenced above exposes extremely serious unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions by attorneys (prosecutors) operating within the Department of Justice.  The book also exposes very serious unfair and unethical judicial actions that occurred within the federal judicial court systems (USA)

     The books gives actual examples, with names of defendants, prosecuting attorneys, and federal court judges, where prominent, well educated and well situated American citizens were prosecuted unfairly, unethically, and ruthlessly when they had done nothing wrong, and some of those victims were convicted and put in prison - wrecking their professional careers and doing great damage to their family member relationships. 

     We will provide more information about this incredibly important book near the end of this very important special report about Judicial Corruption Exposed. 

     Please remember that the numerous judicial corruption actions that are exposed herein are just a few of the extremely corrupt actions that were experienced personally by the founder and president of ABC's of Health, Inc., Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (Lon, Jr. or simply Lon).  He filed more than ten important appeal cases, but this very simplified report will explain only a few of those unfair, unethical, and corrupt trial court cases. 

     The few judicial situations that are reported herein are sufficient to clearly expose the extremely unfair and unethical judicial corruption that he was subjected to and ruthlessly and maliciously harassed, punished, and persecuted with in an ongoing manner.

     Reviewing the extremely unfair and unethical judicial corruption situations reported (exposed) herein will enable visitors to understand important points about their personal vulnerability if they ever have to litigate in a local area court or litigate at a distant location within their home state. 

     As Lon Willoughby learned in a very expensive way ($170,000+ costs), your vulnerability can be much worse if you ever need to litigate in another state's judicial system. You may be a citizen of your home state, but you will likely be treated as a foreigner in any other state of the USA (meaning that you will have no American citizen civil rights that will be respected responsibly in their courts). 

     The further away from your home area a litigation action is located - the worse it will likely be for you - cost wise, inconvenience wise, difficulty wise, frustration and stress wise, and travel time wise. 

     These are very important considerations so give some serious thought to these issues before you choose to travel away from your home county area.  Litigation actions in your home county can also be conducted unfairly, unethically, and corruptly (in a self-serving manner for the legal brotherhood), but those actions will be much easier to cope with simply because they will be close to your home area. 

     Consider how much more difficult (and likely expensive) it will be for you if a litigation action is 100 miles away from your home, or several hundred miles away from home, or maybe a thousand miles or more away from your home.  Also consider that your citizenship in your home state may be helpful to you politically, if you have any political influence in your home state or home area, but you will lose all of your important political influence (for fairness) if you ever have to litigate in a distant state.  People who choose to travel voluntarily away from their home area have no idea how dangerous that can be.

     Visitors also need to understand that litigation actions will normally be taken in the location where the offending action occurred - an automobile accident location, other types of physical accidents, a damaging attack on your person, etc.  If an offending incident occurs in a distant state, as an injured person or party thereto, you will likely have to litigate your complaint actions where the incident occurred - in the appropriate court.  That can turn out to be a very difficult and very frustrating situation, and it can be very time consuming, very stressful, and it will likely be expensive for you. 

     Be very smart - stay close to your home area as much as possible and also be very careful in trying to avoid getting into any situations that might cause a litigation action.

     The information herein can be very important to you in your local area, or if you travel to distant locations in your home state.  It can be even more important if you travel outside of your home state. 

     Visitors need to understand that the judicial systems in America are structured and managed in a manner that makes it very easy for attorneys/lawyers, and judges throughout the judicial systems in different states to conduct litigation actions in unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded self-serving ways - whenever the local trial attorneys/lawyers and the local trial court judge collusively decide to conduct a litigation process in that manner (can occur easily in most litigation locations in the USA). 

     There can be a number of selfish self-serving "elitist" reasons why "they" might choose to conduct a litigation process in an unfair, unethical manner.  They can easily conduct litigation actions that can be very expensive for you as their new victimThey can maliciously and ruthlessly harass, persecute, and severely punish a litigant, even though he or she had done nothing wrong. 

     The attorneys or lawyers involved in litigation actions usually make a lot more money by taking such unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions.  In addition, the more complex they make the litigation process, the more expensive it becomes for the litigants involved in that litigation, and the more money the attorneys/lawyers involved in the litigation can charge their client for their litigation services. 

     We will report herein several litigation and judicial situations where "they" did those kinds of unfair and unethical things to Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. as a non-resident litigant in a distant southern state - about 500 miles away from his home in Greenville County, South Carolina.  Those unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt litigation and judicial actions continued in malicious and ruthless and sadistic ways for more than 20 years of ongoing perverse criminal-minded litigation actions.

  "They" continued making the litigation process more complicated, more unfair, more unethical, and more corrupt as the months, and then the years, went by.  Over time, non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. gradually learned that there was nothing effective and practical that he could do to stop those perverse unfair, unethical, and criminal-mindedly corrupt attorney litigation actions.  Lon found that each trial court judge involved in the litigation actions was consistently "very cooperative" with those local attorney actions against him. 

     Lon Willoughby learned that members of the "legal brotherhood" were in control at every critically important action level, including within all law enforcement agencies that Lon contacted (and he tried to communicate with all of them - state and federal law enforcement agencies).  They would not do anything at all to help him stop the relentless perverse harassment, persecution, and sadistic punishment actions that were being caused by a prominent law firm and its attorney (owner of the law firm). 

     That attorney seemed to derive substantial personal pleasure from his unfair and unethical sadistically vindictive litigation actions against non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., who lived in Greenville County, South Carolina (in the foothills of the Great Smoky Mountains - in the western end of the state). 

     Those ruthless litigation actions continued from September 1989 until the attorney died in December 2001 - about eleven years of ongoing unfair, unethical, malicious, ruthless, sadistically despotic and tyrannical "elitist" autocratic litigation actions.

     After that attorney died (natural death), those unfair litigation actions continued through litigation actions by two of his sons who were also trial attorneys in the distant state.  One of those sons had previously been a state prosecuting type attorney. 

     Those litigation actions finally ceased in year 2010 when litigant Lonnie Willoughby refused to litigate anymore in their corrupt courts.  That was soon after the two attorney brothers (sons of the deceased "defense" attorney) managed to get the unfair, unethical, and corrupt county court judge to authorize them to confiscate more than $126,000 cash from the trustee of the trust estate bank account funds that Lon Willoughby, Jr's parents had provided for him in a local bank account in the county where the parents had lived and where the relevant trial courts were located (the county court and the circuit court). 

     The county court judge had no subject-matter jurisdiction over those litigation issues, but she improperly authorized the confiscation of that amount of funds anyway from the court appointed trustee who had control of defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's trust account funds.   It is important to understand that the 126,000 dollar value involved was more than $100,000 above and beyond the county court's constitutionally authorized jurisdictional limitation. 

     Consequently, the county court judge had no subject-matter jurisdiction to attempt to conduct the Final Judgment hearing.  That high amount of judgment action must be conducted in the circuit court.  Furthermore, the alleged claim by the two attorneys representing their deceased father's law firm was seeking payment from funds that were involved in a trust account established for Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  Trust account litigation actions must also be conducted in the circuit court (not authorized in the county court).

     Consequently, it should have been clear to the county court judge involved, and the two attorneys participating in that Final Judgment litigation hearing, that the county court judge was adjudicating issues that were clearly outside of her authorized county court subject-matter jurisdiction (meaning that her judicial actions were not valid). 

     One of those two attorneys was the attorney representing the plaintiff law firm, and the other attorney participating in the Final Judgment hearing was the local attorney who was representing the defendant trusteeIt is very important to understand that the attorney representing the sued trustee played along with any unfair, unethical, selfish and self-serving corrupt litigation scheme that the plaintiff's attorney, and then his two attorney sons, could develop throughout the 20+ years of ongoing litigation actions. 

     The trustee's attorney had a clear duty to protect the trust account funds from unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions, and in 20+ years of ongoing litigation, he did nothing to protect those trust funds from the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation and judicial actions that are reported (exposed) herein.  Absolutely nothing!!!

     Defendant Lonnie Willoughby understood those very important jurisdictional issues; why did the county court judge involved, and the two attorneys involved, not understand those critical issues?  They did understand those issues of course, but it was more convenient and more expedient for them to conduct a fraudulent Final Judgment hearing than it was to transfer the case back to the circuit court where the court would have had subject-matter jurisdiction to conduct those litigation actions.

     Issuing a Final Judgment (order) without having subject-matter jurisdiction of the issues involved makes the order null and void (technically), but until that order is officially rescinded, it can be used improperly as a valid order by the plaintiff's attorneys (two sons who wanted the order to be treated as effective even though they knew, or should have known, that the order was invalid).  This situation also shows how extremely unfair, dishonest, unethical, and corrupt attorneys and trial court judges can be. 

     Their arrogant, pompous, "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical selfish self-serving attitude is this

     "iI you don't like these county court actions non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., you can initiate a difficult, expensive, and time consuming appeal process to the circuit court (not the appellate court), and you can try to obtain an appeal decision that confirms that our collusive and conspiratorial null and void order is in fact null and void."

     "If you manage to do that (as a pro se appellant or with an attorney's help - for thousands of dollars of additional expenses), we will then rescind our collusive unfair and unethical "null and void" order (which was used to conveniently confiscate $126,000+ from your trust estate funds from a bank account in this state)."

     "We will then transfer this county court case back to the circuit court for further litigation where the attorneys involved can then collusively and conspiratorially come up with another litigation strategy to further complicate the case.  They can then collusively add additional attorney fees to their claim and ultimately confiscate even more of your trust estate funds with their new strategy (due to their additional attorney fee charges  involved with prosecuting their next litigation strategy against you)." 

     "Since the circuit court's injunctive order from December 1993 still prevents you from proceeding pro se in the circuit court case, you will then have to hire one of our attorneys (additional thousands of dollars of expense for you) who will then "cooperate" with whatever unfair, unethical litigation strategy the plaintiff's attorneys (two sons) come up with to defeat you in the ongoing circuit court action."

     Visitors can now see and clearly understand how unfair, unethical, and corrupt the litigation process can be.  If one unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation strategy scheme is defeated in an appeal (not likely but it can happen), they will not be investigated in any way for their unfair, unethical, and corrupt trial court actions. 

     No criminal investigation means there will be no penalties or punishment of any type for their extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt trial court litigation actions that forced non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby into another expensive, frustrating, and time consuming appeal action. 

     Consequently, they will be free (and encouraged) to develop another unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation strategy that will further complicate the litigation process and cause more attorney fees (by them/for them) that will then cause the Final Judgment outcome to be even more expensive for non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     The bottom line of all of this extended litigation is this:  they will win in the end, even if it takes 20+ years to get to the end of their extended complicated litigation process.  The plaintiff attorneys are going to illegally force defendant Willoughby to pay for all the accumulating litigation attorney fees involved throughout the extended litigation process, even though their previous client (co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.) had a valid written contract with the plaintiff law firm - that if a dispute arose over attorney fees, the client would be obligated to pay only 10% of the amount of the initial dispute (about $3,300).  Let's calculate that amount:  10% of 3,300 = $330 in litigation expenses - if defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. lost in the attorney fee dispute litigation process.    

     But you see, with all of the unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation schemes and tactics that were used with multiple "cooperative" judges over a 20+ years litigation process, the plaintiff's attorneys (two sons) and the final judge (county court judge) simply ignored the contract terms - af if they did not exist.  Consequently, the two attorney sons ended up confiscating more that $126,000 from the trustee of the trust estate bank account in that state for Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     Remember that the trustee's defense attorney was also involved in all of this litigation for about 20 years, and he did nothing to protect those trust account funds from the very obvious unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt self-serving litigation actions of the plaintiff law firm and its attorney (the FDA) and then his two attorney sons (after the FDA died in December 2001).
 
     Beneficiary Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could not withdraw any of those trust estate funds because they were under the direct control of the court appointed trustee (since October 1989)., and the  plaintiff law firm had also sued the trustee in 1990 for collection of those funds ($3,300).  The attorney died (12/2001) about 11 years after that litigation process was initiated in 1990 against non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby and the court appointed trustee (lawsuit filed by said attorney's law firm - the FDA). 

     We will show herein how that attorney had initially represented defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., as his "defense" attorney in a relatively simple lawsuit that should have been easy for the "defense" attorney to win for defendant co-trustee Lon Jr. (1989)

     However, we will show how that "defense" attorney knowingly and willfully chose to collusively and conspiratorially "cooperate" in a criminal-minded manner with the plaintiff's attorney's extremely unfair and unethical scheme to "ambush" defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during the one day non-jury "equity court" trial. (9/8/1989) As bad luck would have it, the circuit court judge that presided over the one-day trial was a very biased, bigoted, unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt circuit court judge.

     That circuit court judge was subsequently forced to retire early by the Supreme Court of that state (to get him off the bench as a practicing judge) due to serious complaints about his judicial conduct by some local attorneys.  Prior to that action, co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. was another "victim" of the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judge.

     In 1989, both of the "opposing" trial attorneys knew each other well and they knew the circuit court judge well.  The 267 pages trial transcript record for that one-day non-jury trial showed convincingly that the two "opposing" attorneys collusively decided to perpetrate a heinous fraud upon defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., and they also perpetrated a  heinous "fraud upon the court" and they did that with the full "cooperation" of the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt circuit court judge.

     The trial transcript shows that the circuit court judge fully "cooperated" with the plaintiff's attorney's heinous criminal-minded "ambush" surprise complaints scheme during the trial proceeding.  This report shows that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was a very competent co-trustee who was betrayed by both attorneys and the trial court judge when "they" ruthlessly denied him fundamental due process of law standards for that trial. 

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. has no tolerance for attorneys and judges who are deceitful, unethical, criminal-minded "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical liars and thieves.  Their extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt dastardly litigation actions are exposed herein in some detail so millions of American adult citizens can see what appalling, disgusting, and corrupt scoundrels elitist "officers of the court" can be. 

     Does Lonnie Willoughby believe that all trial court judges in American are unethical, unfair, and corrupt?  No, he wants to believe that there are some good judges in America (he hopes so).  However, in 20+ years of ongoing litigation actions about an extremely corrupt law firm and its attorney, defendant Lonnie Willoughby did not encounter any trial court judge that did not actively "cooperate" with unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation schemes and tactics that were obviously trying to prevent non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby from being able to competently defend himself pro se.  Several judges also acted unfairly, unethically, and outrageously corruptly to prevent Lonnie Willoughby from having a fair and impartial judicial forum where he could responsibly prosecute pro se his very strong counter-claim complaints about the plaintiff law firm and its attorney(s).

     A series of seven successor trial court judges consistently treated non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby like he was their "enemy" and an "enemy" of the judicial system.  Why?  Because he had made several responsible conscientious efforts to defend his constitutionally protected right to obtain a fair and impartial judicial forum for litigation actions.  His multiple appeals about unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions had also responsibly reported and exposed the unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorney actions and judicial actions that had occurred in the trial court below. 

     We will show herein how two consecutive circuit court judges committed serious criminal judicial acts in their deliberate efforts to prevent counterclaim plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby from being able to prosecute his counterclaim complaint actions about deceit, fraud, and legal malpractice against the extremely corrupt attorney and his law firm in a jury trial.  He had a rock solid case that would be easy to prove convincingly to a jury, but corrupt circuit court judges prevented him from getting that jury trial.

     In 20+ years of ongoing related litigation actions, that trial never occurred due to extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions that prevented Lonnie Willoughby from being able to prosecute his counterclaim complaints in his pro se capacity.   In essence, the trial court judges were as corrupt as they could be at every opportunity to prevent those complaints from going to a jury trial (a constitutionally protected right).

Turning The Tables On Judicial Corruption

     Visitors can review this very important report to learn how Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. finally turned the tables on all of the unfair, unethical, and corrupt selfish self-serving members of the "legal brotherhood" throughout the entire USA for the next 70 years. 

     Visitors to this department will learn how several million Americans will be involved - all of those "legal brotherhood" members, and their spouses, and their children, and their parents, and their employees will be affected adversely because Lonnie Willoughby has  denied all of them access to our very special natural healthcare and wellness concepts education throughout the next 70 years. 

     Those restrictive actions are due to their collective extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions and judicial adjudication actions - as will be reported and exposed in some detail in the remainder of this report. 

     Furthermore, our company (ABC of Health) will not present our very special natural healthcare and wellness concepts education services to any people who live within the distant southern state where this terrible judicial corruption took place over 20+ years. This restriction of our natural healthcare educational actions means that many additional millions of American citizens in that distant southern state will be strictly excluded from any participation in our qualifiable citizens categories for QV's, AQV's, and CQV's

     Consequently, our company will not provide our very special natural healthcare and wellness concepts education services for anyone living within that state - for the next 70+ years.  We do not want to handicap those millions of Americans in any way, but we will not conduct any business in that state that might cause our company to become subject to litigation in their extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt courts. 

     This special Website will continue presenting very important and valuable natural healthcare and wellness concepts education services for all American adult citizens, including the millions of Americans who live in that distant southern state.  They will still have access to the Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts education services that we provide at this Website for all American adult citizens, including members of the "legal brotherhood" and law enforcement agencies in the USA

    That Free introductory basic and fundamental natural healthcare and wellness concepts education is very important and very valuable, but it is only the tip of the iceberg of the natural healthcare and wellness concepts education that we can present to our Certified Qualified Visitors (CQV's).
   

Trial Court Judges and

Law Enforcement Systems

     This very important report will also expose the very "cooperative relationships" that usually exist between the judicial systems in America and the various law enforcement systems in America.  This seems like a logical and reasonable situation, but read on to learn why this can be a very bad situation.

     You will learn herein that the judicial systems in America, over many years, have severely corrupted the various law enforcement systems in ways that enable the judicial systems in America to easily and conveniently operate in extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving ways that can be very beneficial to members of the legal professions in America (the "elitist" legal brotherhood). 

     Those selfish self-serving actions can be very harmful to many American citizens each year on a continuing basis - year after year.  Unfortunately, those types of appalling and disgustingly unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial situations are likely to get worse, rather than better, as the future of America continues to develop. 

     This very special report is exceptionally important to all American adult citizens because it offers a special opportunity for millions of American voters to get educated about these issues easily and quickly, and it is Free.  We also make it very easy to share this important information with others.

     American adult citizens can learn about very serious widespread judicial corruption in America that can easily affect adult citizens personally.  This special report will enable visitors to learn about actions that they can take to reduce and minimize these dangers in their life. 

     Lon Willoughby understands that education of millions of American voters about these judicial corruption conditions is essential if American citizens are ever going to have a reasonable and responsible opportunity to get exceptionally important legislation enacted in the U.S. Congress that can finally help improve the fairness, honesty, and professional integrity of the judicial systems and the law enforcement systems in America


Visitors Can Help Spread The Word

About This Very Important Website

     Visitors will also learn that they can easily help Lon and Janie Willoughby use this Website and this special department to educate millions of American voters about these unfair, unethical, and corrupt selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical judicial conditions in America

     It is very important to understand that American patriots need to take responsible actions now to help educate Americans about this very special report.  These very bad judicial conditions can get even worse for our children, our grandchildren, and our great grandchildren if enough American voters do not take advantage of the vital education that this very special report offers them right now. 

     You have never seen another Judicial Corruption Exposed Report similar to this one, and it is most unlikely that there will ever be another educational opportunity similar to this one.  This is it folks; let's use this incredibly important report to help educate millions of responsible and sensible American voters about these extremely corrupt judicial issues.  Lets do it NOW!

     Lon and Janie have been through an extremely difficult time for more than 20 years, emotionally, physically, and financially, but they both managed to survive - thanks to Lon's advanced level of knowledge about natural healthcare and wellness concepts and nutrition supplement products.     

     That terrible stress was caused by extremely unfair and unethical litigation and judicial harassment, persecution, and punishment actions that were conducted in malicious and ruthless "elitist" aristocratic autocratic sadistically vindictive ways against non-resident litigant Lon Willoughby, Jr.

     Lon and Janie have spent a lot of time developing this exceptionally important Website and also in developing this special Judicial Corruption Exposed Report to help educate millions of responsible patriotic-minded American citizens about the very important issues reported herein.

     Visitors can now use this special Website to help Lon and Janie educate millions of responsible patriotic-minded American citizens about some of the vital natural healthcare and wellness concepts that are available Free at this Website.  America needs all of the  productive patriotic-minded citizens that we find to help with this healthcare information.

     This judicial report makes it easy for responsible patriotic-minded visitors to help Lon and Janie spread the word about the frightening potential for Judicial Corruption in American Courts

     Becoming aware of these potential dangers is the very important "first step" for
American adult citizens to take to protect themselves and protect some family members from having to cope with extremely unfair, unethical, corrupt, and ruthless money confiscation judicial actions. 


If Lon Had Known About This

Situation Back In Early 1989

     NOTE:  If co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., living in South Carolina, had already learned about these extremely dangerous unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial conditions, he would have avoided getting involved in the family member trust management litigation dispute that started in February 1989.  But he was naive and ignorant about the judicial systems in America. 

     He foolishly believed that American judicial systems would be reasonably fair and ethical where judges were special selected Americans who were smart, ethical, fair-minded, reasonable, responsible, and sensible people who wanted to dispense justice in a fair and impartial manner.  However, Lon Willoughby, Jr. gradually learned that trial court judges and appellate court judges all have a main objective of maintaining "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic control over all litigants.

     This very special report shows that Lon Jr. is still involved, 28+ years later, in the terrible litigation mess that two "opposing" attorneys and an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt circuit court judge deliberately created with an excellent Amended Trust Agreement estate management and settlement plan in September - October 1989

     "They" knowingly and willfully caused that litigation mess in a malicious and sadistically  vindictive effort to ruthlessly punish son Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. - because he had helped develop that Amended Trust Agreement for his aging parents - who lived in the distant southern state.

      Lon and wife Janie Willoughby were subjected to 20+ years of extreme emotional and financial stress because of that situation.  They are determined and committed to helping educate millions of responsible patriotic-minded American citizens about the extremely corrupt judicial actions that occurred during those 20+ years (this very important report).  Lon and Janie need your help in making this very important educational objective occur - as soon as possible (ASAP).     

     You have already learned that this special Website provides some very important and very valuable natural healthcare and wellness concepts education that is Free to all visitors to this Website. You also learned that ABC of Health can provide a lot more of this vital natural healthcare education for qualifiable America adult citizens. 

     Lon and Janie Willoughby want to help good responsible patriotic-minded American citizens be healthier citizens because healthy citizens can help defend and protect America better than unhealthy citizens.  Remember that America is losing unhealthy people prematurely at the rate of 120,000+ per month.  Those people can no longer help defend and protect America, as we propose herein.  All visitors can join forces with Lon and Janie and help them promote these vital education projects.

      Can Lon and Janie Willoughby count on your important help in spreading the word to other responsible patriotic-minded American citizens about this very important natural healthcare and wellness concepts education website and this very special Judicial Corruption Exposed Report


Naive Ignorant Beliefs About

Attorneys, Lawyers, and Judges

     In February 1989, Lon Willoughby, Jr. naively believed that the legal profession was an honorable profession and attorneys, lawyers, and judges had good responsible ethics standards that they were required to comply with.  Lon did not know that their State Bar Association's published ethics standards were usually treated as impressive "window dressing" for gullible public consumption. 

     Co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. did not know that the judicial systems in American were dominated and controlled effectively by unfair and unethical corrupt-minded selfish self-appointed and self-serving narcissistic "elitist" aristocratic autocratic legal despots and tyrants.

     The deplorable judicial conditions that are reported herein will likely get even worse over time unless millions of voters get educated about these appalling and disgusting conditions (by reviewing this revealing report).  With enough educated voters, we can obtain important legislative actions that can help improve the honesty, integrity, and fairness of judicial systems throughout the USA.  Yes, this can be done and it should be done, and Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. understands what needs to be done.

     This very special report will show that the judicial systems in America have some serious built in structural flaws that allow members of the legal professions in America to conveniently and easily corrupt the judicial systems in extremely unfair, unethical, and selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical ways

     Yes, we know, most Americans reading this report for the first time will likely think at this point in this report that we are exaggerating the severity of these litigation and judicial conditions somewhat.  However, by the time visitors complete a review of this incredibly important report, they well see and understand why these statements were not exaggerations at all.  If anything, these statements are understatements of how unfair and unethical litigation and judicial conditions can be in America.  

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. will show herein that those self-serving corrupting litigation and judicial conditions are effective to such an extreme extent that it is not possible for a severely abused litigant to defend himself or herself from unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions, even when those abusive judicial actions are at an outrageous level of unfair, unethical, and corrupt activity. 

     You will learn herein that an attorney or lawyer can betray their client's interest in extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt ways any time "they" want to do that, and there is essentially nothing that the client can do about it.  Legal services can easily be extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt!!!

     The American citizens who dominate and effectively control the legal professions in America apparently believe it is better to allow extremely unfair and unethical judicial damages to routinely occur to "innocent litigant victims" than to take responsible corrective actions that could damage or tarnish the public's image of the "legal profession" or the public's image of the "judicial systems in America."  They want their public image to look good even though extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving "elitist" judicial actions are taking place on a frequent basis.

     That situation is one of the major self-serving reasons that the judicial systems in America (the USA) are allowed to continue being unfair, unethical, and criminal-mindedly corrupt on a routine basis.  "They" do not want to do anything that might tarnish their public image so they have allowed these extremely unfair and unethical judicial conditions to go on and on and on during the past 200+ years. 

     Lon and Janie Willoughby believe it is way past time for them to take responsible actions.  It is very clear that they have no intentions of taking those actions.  Consequently, Lon and Janie Willoughby are determined to use Lon's personal experiences with judicial system actions to report and expose the wide-spread narcissistic "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical selfish and self-serving criminal-minded corruption that can flourish in American courts.

   

Unfair, Unethical, and Corrupt Judicial
Actions Are Good For Their Business

     Visitors will also learn herein that unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions are actually good for "their" business.  The judicial systems in America generate a lot more income from unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions than would be generated if all litigation actions were conducted in fair-minded, ethical, and responsible ways.

    If that desirable situation actually occurred, the appellate courts would have very little business to attend to.  There would be very little need to file appeals if trial court actions were conducted in competent fair-minded, ethical, responsible, and sensible ways. 

     However, the way things work routinely, the appellate courts are typically inundated with appeal cases.  That situation, all over America, shows convincingly and conclusively that there is a lot of unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions taking place in the trial courts throughout America.   Appellate courts are so busy that It can take many months to years to complete an appellate court litigation process. 

     You will also learn herein that appellate courts routinely refuse to provide a written legal opinion for the appeal case.  They frequently provide just three words as an appeal decision.  Affirmed, Per Curium That's it - nothing more.  We will explain this situation in more detail later in this report.

     This special report can help educate millions of responsible patriotic-minded and freedom-loving American citizens about unfair and unethical judicial corruption situations.  It is very important for American citizens to become aware of this very serious judicial corruption and then help other Americans by inviting responsible caring patriotic-minded American citizens to visit this very important Website and then visit this Free Judicial Corruption Exposed department

     After responsible American visitors become aware of these outrageously unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving judicial practices, they will hopefully be motivated to take important actions, as recommended herein - that can help them minimize and/or prevent their involvement in potentially unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions -  as much as possible in our complex social system. 

     Hopefully, a responsible review of this department will enable visitors to understand why it is very important for them to minimize travel away from their home county and also help spread the word about this very important and very enlightening Free report about judicial corruption.


Appeal Processes

     Visitors can learn herein that the appeal processes that are available in many judicial systems in America are probably corrupted in a selfish self-serving manner.  The appeal processes can easily be used by members of the legal profession to further harass, intimidate, persecute, and punish abused litigants financially, emotionally, and health-wise due to the extreme levels of stress that can be caused by unfair, unethical, and corrupt selfish and vindictive self-serving actions by appellate court judges. 

     Visitors can also learn herein that there are no effective safeguards designed into the judicial systems (state systems or federal systems) that can cost effectively deter and prevent unfair, unethical, and corrupt selfish self-serving judicial actions from occurring with alarming levels of routine activity. 

     Why is this true?  Because there are no effective honest, ethical, and responsible investigative safe-guards built into the judicial systems in America.  The judicial systems are primarily dependent upon a very foolish system of "trust" - trust that members of the legal professions will always operate with a reasonable level of fairness, honesty, and integrity in all litigation and judicial actions. 

     This very important report will expose some of the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt judicial actions and situations that were perpetrated against non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. within this "trust" system over 20+ years of ruthless unfair litigation actions.

     Hundreds of years of human history have proven many times that human beings in positions of authority, control, and power over other people cannot be "trusted" to be honest and fair.  In many "trust" situations, the "trusted actions" are in conflict with the selfish self-serving objectives of the person or persons in charge. 

    Lon learned that there are no effective prosecutorial types of investigations and punishments available for attorneys, lawyers, trial court judges, or appellate court judges who participate in unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving judicial actions.  There may be statutory criminal laws in the state's statute books that properly prohibit those unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions, but who is going to investigate an abused litigant's complaints about those criminal statutory law violations? 

     Lon Willoughby's experiences over 20+ years proved convincingly and conclusively that no one is going to conduct the needed investigation(s); consequently, there will not be any disciplinary or punishment actions for those serious criminal activities by attorneys, lawyers, or judges.  This is a situation where the foxes are guarding the hen house, and they can do whatever they want to do.

     Lon Jr. learned the hard and expensive way that any litigant who responsibly and competently and courageously exposes those types of unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation and judicial actions will be severely punished by the trial court judges and/or the appellate court judges that become involved in those "reporting situations." 

     That's right, the trial court judges and/or the appellate court judges will maliciously and ruthlessly punish a litigant for responsibly and courageously exposing attorney/lawyer corruption or judicial corruption.  That situation shows how corrupt the systems are in a selfish self-serving manner.

     You will learn herein that members of the legal professions in America (the USA) can usually get away with any unfair, unethical, corrupt litigation schemes and tactics that they can devise to help them win a litigation action because the trial court judges that are involved in those litigation actions or cases are usually "very cooperative" with allowing their litigation schemes and tactics to succeed - no matter how unfair, unethical, or corrupt their schemes and tactics may be.  Yes, it really is that bad!


Our Instructive and

Educational Objectives

     This very important report is designed to be instructive to visitors and help them understand why it is very important to avoid as much as possible any activity or association with the judicial systems in America (the USA).  Their funds can be reduced a lot by simply minimizing the use of their services.

     You will learn herein that most Americans are very vulnerable to judicial system abuse that can be very harmful to them financially, and emotionally, and health-wise due to the potential for extreme levels of emotional stress that can very effectively cause serious and possibly tragic health outcomes. 

     We help visitors understand that emotional stress can suppress very important immune system functions, and over time those conditions can result in very serious health consequences.  Think about cardiovascular disease conditions (heart attacks and strokes), cancer conditions of several kinds, arthritis, diabetes, hypoglycemia, dementia conditions, glandular problems, anxiety, depression, etc.

    As related in the first two paragraphs of this department's judicial corruption report, we have developed some very restrictive limitations at this Website for some potential visitors, as explained in our Terms of Use department. 

     Our responsible restrictions are due to the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving manner in which some of those people conducted themselves regarding Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's (Lon Jr's) responsible valid complaints about unfair, unethical, and corrupt criminal-minded judicial actions.  Those actions were taken against non-resident Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during 20+ years of ongoing malicious and ruthless sadistically vindictive harassment, persecution, and severe punishment types of litigation actions and adjudication judicial actions. 

     Lon Jr. will show herein that those appalling and disgustingly corrupt judicial actions were taken to ruthlessly harass, persecute, and punish him severely, as much as they could with him living in South Carolina throughout those 20+ years of related evil and vile litigation and judicial actions. 

     "They" maliciously and ruthlessly tried to destroy Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. as a responsible American and as a self-employed business owner. They relentlessly tried to destroy his business and bankrupt him (and they succeeded), and they effectively destroyed his reputation with most family members and all of his near relatives (due to the extremely false statements about defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. that were published in the extremely unfair, unethical, and fraudulent Final Judgment that was rendered in October 1989). 

     If Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had lived in the distant state, those situations could have been even worse because they could have also arrested him and put him in "their" county jail to serve multiple terms of incarceration for their unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt convictions for three "contempt of court" adjudications.  They tried to do that three times, but he managed to evade their unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt jail term schemes.

     The county court did not even have subject-matter jurisdiction of those issues - falsely alleged violations of the circuit court's extremely unfair and unethical injunctive order (rendered in 12/1993) that prohibited non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. from filing any more pleadings in the circuit court case unless the pleadings were signed by an attorney. 

     Defendant Lon Willoughby had not violated the circuit court's injunctive order in any manner whatsoever, but even if there had been a violation of that order, only the circuit court can enforce alleged violations of its injunctive order

     A circuit court judge's injunctive order about defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could not be enforced by a county court judge (the county court clearly had no subject-matter jurisdiction for enforcement of a circuit court's injunctive order involving defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.). 

     However, those unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt judicial actions forced defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to file an appeal to the "local" circuit court about that issue - after the county court judge denied defendant Willoughby's Motion to Dismiss that improper prosecution.       

    That alleged criminal contempt of court case was then prosecuted by one of the local state attorney's staff attorneys because the alleged criminal contempt was a misdemeanor criminal caseThe female attorney from the state attorney's office went ahead with that prosecution trial action, and she unfairly and unethically and corruptly prosecuted non-resident defendant for criminal contempt of the county court when there was no contempt of any county court order by non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     She knew that of course, and the county court judge knew that also, and they both knew, or should have known, that the county court had no subject-matter jurisdiction over the circuit court's injunctive order about defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     However, the official records for those actions show that the prosecuting attorney and the county court judge worked together collusively to convict defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. anyway - knowing that he had not done anything that could  be considered a legitimate contempt of any county court order.  No county court order had been issued in the case so defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. could not have violated any county court order. 

     As defendant Willoughby's Motion to Dismiss had reported, the county court did not have any subject-matter jurisdiction to attempt to enforce the circuit court's injunctive order as a basis for their scheduled prosecution of defendant Willoughby, Jr. for criminal contempt of court. However, they proceeded anyway with their unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt criminal contempt of court prosecution of non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  This situation shows how unfair and corrupt the county court judge and the prosecuting attorney were.  

     The alleged violation of the circuit court's injunctive order was another extremely unfair and unethical false allegation by Lon Willoughby, Jr's Former Defense Attorney (the FDA) - from the initial civil litigation case and the "equity court" one-day trial conducted on 9/8/1989.  That alleged criminal contempt of court action was an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt sadistically vindictive litigation action against a former client (co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.). 

     We have shown herein that the FDA had no ethics at all - zero - the man was a disgusting criminal-minded narcissistic "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical attorney, and the "local" judges in that county cooperated with his extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions in any way they could - repeatedly, and those types of persecution type litigation actions continued until the attorney died in December 2001. (Malicious and ruthless sadistic persecution litigation of non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. from September 1989 into December 2001 - 12 years.)

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. understood that the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt county court judge was playing along with the heinous unethical corrupt litigation scheme concocted by the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt FDA

     That heinous litigation scheme was an obvious attempt to get non-resident Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (living in South Carolina) convicted of a clearly fraudulent claim of criminal contempt of court (of the county court when there was no violation of any action by the county court). 

     The situation explained briefly above illustrates that members of the legal profession (attorneys, lawyers, and trial court judges) can concoct all sorts of unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation schemes against innocent litigants any time they decide to do that.  When they take those kinds of judicial actions, they prove that they have no normal ethics and also prove that they have no professional ethics.

     They know that they can get away with prosecuting those unfair, unethical, and corrupt schemes any time they want to maliciously and ruthlessly persecute and punish an innocent litigant for their own sadistic and vindictive emotional "pleasure." 

     Those litigation and judicial actions and tactics are "fun and games" for them - to practice abusing their litigation authority and power as "officers of the court" and then enjoy observing how their helpless victim responds to their abusive litigation actions. 

     You will learn herein that members of the legal profession, and members of the state and federal law enforcement agencies repeatedly refused to take any responsible actions to evaluate Lon Jr's valid responsible complaints about unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation and judicial actions. 

     Consequently, all of them (law enforcement) sat back and did nothing that would help initiate an investigation that might help stop the ongoing relentless malicious ruthless harassment,  persecution, and punishment of non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. by unfair, unethical, and corrupt criminal-minded sadistic vindictive attorneys and judges in the distant southern state. 

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., as a non-resident litigant, found that he was on his own - no one in judicial or law enforcement authority would help him initiate a responsible investigation of his very serious responsible and well-documented complaints about the outrageous level of vindictive litigation abuse that he was being subjected to - in an ongoing manner over a period of many months.

     As stated previously, the first part of this report presents an overview of some of the judicial corruption that this report exposes for all to seeThe second part of this report will provide specific examples of some of those unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation and judicial actions. 

     Visitors can learn about unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation and judicial actions that actually happened in the USA - that went on for years and years.  Visitors can also see how the judicial systems in America can easily operate in extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt ways - any time they want to do this. 

     Visitors will also see that "they" can get away with those kinds of actions - every time, without any fair and responsible investigation of those unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation or judicial actions.  With no proper investigations, there will be no punishment actions - NONE!!!

     Lon Willoughby is determined to help get something done about this terrible self-serving judicial corruption.  He has personally spent thousands of hours of his life dealing with and learning about these judicial corruption situations.  He has also spent thousands of hours developing this very helpful natural healthcare concepts education Website and this special department that exposes very serious judicial corruption and terrible "conflicts of interest situations for trial attorneys, trial court judges, appeal attorneys, and appellate court judges.

     All of those thousands of hours of intense dedicated work by Lon will enable millions of intelligent, responsible, ethical, sensible, and patriotic-minded Americans to learn exceptionally important and valuable information about the terrible selfish, self-serving, elitist aristocratic, autocratic, despotic, and tyrannical corruption that is common practice in American judicial systems.  This special Website work will also enable millions of those responsible and ethical Americans to easily and conveniently help spread this exceptionally important education throughout America - in the ways explained below.   


At Age 82, Lon Is Still Actively Exposing
Unfair and Unethical Judicial Corruption

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. is determined to share this very important information with as many responsible, freedom-loving patriotic-minded American adults as possible.  You can help Lon spread the word about this Website and this very important department by referring some of the people in your "circle of influence" to this Website with a personal note that encourages them to be sure and review this Judicial Corruption Exposed department.

     Lon learned that arrogant pompous "elitist" unfair, unethical, corrupt-minded selfish self-serving and self-appointed aristocratic autocratic despots and tyrants have a lot of control over the legal professions and the judicial systems in America.  Lon learned that "they" can also exercise a lot of control over the prosecutorial duties and functions of the law enforcement systems in America. 

     Prosecuting attorneys can wield enormous control and power over criminal-type prosecutions, and  they can easily operate like unfair, unethical, corrupt despots and tyrants.  Members of the arrogant "elitist" aristocratic autocratic "legal brotherhood" can usually benefit from that prosecutorial control and power for their own selfish self-serving advantages and benefits, as will be shown herein. 


Can Millions of American Voters Join Together and

Do Something Helpful About These Judicial Problems?


     Lon Willoughby realizes that "they" are counting on most American citizens to be too busy with their individual jobs and careers, and too preoccupied with various forms of entertainment, and too  irresponsible, and too lazy to take the helpful protective actions that are recommended herein. 

     This special Website has been developed by Lon and Janie Willoughby to be a very important  introductory educational resource about alternative health and complementary health type natural healthcare and wellness conceptsThis Website offers natural healthcare education that can help millions of Americans begin taking better care of their precious health and thereby become smarter, stronger, and better patriotic American citizens.

     This special Judicial Corruption Exposed department also educates responsible American visitors about very important litigation and judicial system concepts that all American adult citizens need to understand ASAP. 

     Lon's 18,000+ hours of work with trial court litigation and judicial issues in America enabled him to understand that large numbers of American citizens are very likely being taken advantage of each year by members of the "legal brotherhood" in America.  The incredibly important education presented in this department can help millions of American citizens learn how to protect themselves from abusive actions by attorneys.

     This Website also presents an easy evaluation of responsible freedom-loving American patriotism.  Each American adult citizen visitor that reads this far needs to consider whether or not they have a sufficient sense of ethics, responsibility, and patriotism to help develop a national movement to protect very important American civil rights and freedoms.  Are you willing to help inform other people about this Website and this very important Judicial Corruption Exposed Report

     This is a very important opportunity for you to do something really important about helping protect very important freedoms in America.  Lon and Janie have made it very easy for you to take these very important actions.  You can participate by inviting responsible citizens that you know to visit this Website and by encouraging them to review this special department

     For American adult visitors that have read this far at this Website, you will pass the educational test that is built into this Website when you complete a responsible review of our Home department presentation - which includes several other departments, including this very special department.   Congratulations in advance for your very important educational achievement!!!

     Lon and Janie Willoughby realize that many visitors will not stay with this very important report down to this point.  Unfortunately, those people will wash themselves out (for various reasons) and they will not be able to qualify to obtain some of the very valuable natural healthcare and wellness concepts that Lon and Janie Willoughby have made available for "qualified" visitors at this Website. 

     We hope you appreciate this very valuable education and will help Lon and Janie spread the word about this very important Website.  You can play an important part by helping with this education.


How Much Power and Control Do "They" Have?

     The 20+ years of judicial harassment, persecution, and punishment that "they" maliciously forced upon Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt manner shows how much "they" have consolidated their self-serving control and power over Americans in the past 200+ years. 

     The fact that "they" have a dominant level of control over every state in America, and every county within every state, shows how determined they are to dominant and control all American citizens.  Yes, the abundant evidence reported herein shows that they want to rule over all ordinary Americans as if they are indentured servants of the aristocratic ruling class, the "legal brotherhood."

     It is therefore very important that this special Website and this very special Judicial Corruption Exposed department be used to help educate responsible caring American patriots about how the very well organized "legal brotherhood" has very quietly "taken control of America" to a large extent for their own selfish self-serving benefits.  Read on to see what they did to Lon Willoughby.


Without Firing A Single Shot

     It is also important to understand that "they" have accomplished this despicable selfish self-serving elitist aristocratic "capturing of America feat" without having to fire a single shot.  That is one of the very important reasons they try to get as many members of the "legal brotherhood" as possible elected to positions in the U.S. Congress (House of Representatives and the Senate).

     They obviously realize that they need to have sufficient numbers of votes in the U.S. Congress to help them use their specialized legal knowledge and skills to manage, propose, and control as much as possible legislation that can affect the "legal brotherhood" in any manner - adversely or favorably.

     They use those same strategies in getting as many members of the "legal brotherhood" as they can elected to state legislature positions - again establishing as many votes as possible to help them manage and try to control legislative actions that can affect the "legal brotherhood" in any way. 

     No other profession in America is as well organized in the political arenas of individual states and in the U.S. Congress as the legal profession.  They have been working at this, generation after generation, for more than 200+ years, and most American citizens are still not aware of the insidious political dangers that can be involved with having too many attorneys influencing legislative actions in Washington D.C., or in the various states in the United States of America.  

     However, please understand that we outnumber "them" 100+ to 1 as voters.  We can help protect ourselves from their insidious self-serving political danger if we take very easy actions to help educate millions of responsible patriotic-minded American voters about the very dangerous and sinister "legal brotherhood" situations that are responsibly exposed in this very special report

     How can responsible, sensible, patriotic-minded American citizens do that?  It is very easy - just invite responsible American voters to this special Website and encouraging them to review this very special department (Judicial Corruption Exposed)

     This can be done easily with E-mails to people that you know, and with postings on social media outlets, with handouts (typed and printed multiple times on sheets of paper to cut out small handout pieces of paper, etc.).  You can think of other helpful actions.

     Remember that Lon Willoughby has gone to a lot of trouble, a tremendous amount of legal work, and a lot of expense (many thousands of dollars) to expose unfair, unethical, litigation actions and corrupt trial court actions to appellate court judges numerous times.  He also notified appropriate law enforcement agents and agencies about some of those situations - several times. 

     However, his diligent responsible and expensive reporting efforts did not find anyone that would help him get responsible investigative actions taken that could result in prosecution of the extremely malicious and ruthless sadistic vindictive harassment and persecution type litigation actions that are reported herein.  Everyone that he communicated with in the judicial systems and in law enforcement agencies (state law enforcement personnel and the FBI personnel) treated his reports as routine practice that did not warrant any serious attention or concern on their part.

     After the arrest warrants were issued to all sheriff's in the distant state in 1994, defendant Lon Willoughby could no longer travel into that state to communicate with the local FBI personnel again about what was taking place in the litigation process.  He had already talked with them twice about those extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial situations, but they took no action to help him.

     Those situations clearly showed Lon how much control "they" currently have over those types of litigation and judicial corruption issues.  Lon realizes that most American adult citizens do not know much about the extensive unfair, unethical, and extreme judicial corruption that is exposed in this very special report.  We need to inform millions of American voters about this important report.

     If American adult citizens who responsibly review this special report will simple refer ten American voters to this special Website, with a personal note to be sure to review this Judicial Corruption Exposed department, within one year's time, we can probably have more than a million responsible freedom-loving patriotic-minded American voters who have been:

     1)  educated about some of our very important Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts - that can help them become healthier and stronger and smarter freedom-loving American patriots and

     2)  educated about these exceptionally important Judicial Corruption Exposed issues.

     Within two year's time, this very valuable Free healthcare and wellness concepts education and this Judicial Corruption Exposed Report can spread to 10 million or more responsible caring  patriotic-minded American voters.  From that point in time, within another year or two, this very beneficial and helpful healthcare and judicial corruption information will have been reviewed by most of the responsible caring freedom-loving patriotic-minded American voters throughout America. 

     When we get enough voters informed properly about the unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving arrogant "elitist" aristocratic despotic and tyrannical judicial corruption exposed herein, we will have sufficient voter support to get some very important legislation enacted in the U.S. Congress to responsibly improve the fairness, honesty, and integrity in the judicial systems and also the law enforcement prosecutorial systems within the United States of America

     It is very important to understand that "they" do not have sufficient votes in the U.S. Congress or the individual states to actually stop the passage of badly needed legislation that can affect millions of American citizens in very beneficial ways. 

     We clearly need criminal felony level laws enacted specifically for members of the "legal profession" and for "law enforcement personnel" and we need a separate system established for reviewing citizens' complaints about unfair, unethical, and irresponsible self-serving actions by members of either profession - a reviewing system that is not controlled by members of the "legal brotherhood." 

     This is the most effective way of enacting legislation that can have a reasonable and responsible monitoring effect upon self-appointed arrogant narcissistic "elitist" aristocratic autocratic corrupt despots and tyrants who are members of the "legal brotherhood."  Their "trust" system will never work properly; they have had 200+ years to get it working properly.  As shown herein - it is a miserable failure at all levels of the judicial systems (trial courts and appellate courts).  They will never get this job done properly within their selfish self-serving good ole' boy "legal brotherhood" system.

     All of the legislators in America (federal and states) need to be educated by reviewing this special report.  They need to understand clearly that the "legal brotherhood" has established a selfish self-serving self-appointed "elitist aristocracy" in America that effectively controls the investigations, the prosecutions, and the lack of punishment for members of their "elitist" aristocracy. 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr's litigation experiences proved that "they" can conduct extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation schemes and tactics any time they choose to do so and get away with it without any responsible investigations, prosecutions, or punishment - every time.

     Lon and Janie Willoughby understand that we need to educate millions of freedom-loving patriotic-minded voters about these very important issues to develop enough voter support to get badly needed protective legislation passed in the U.S. Congress.  After that occurs, we can then focus our attention on individual state legislatures, and get appropriate legislation passed in the states also.

     This very special Judicial Corruption Exposed Report will help visitors understand why the self-appointed "elitist" aristocratic "legal brotherhood" will do anything possible to protect their public image from being tarnished.  Lon has exposed herein how "they" will ruthlessly try to coverup and hide very serious unfair and unethical litigation corruption problems within their ranks. 

     Those kinds of unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving judicial actions will be exposed later in this special report using actual examples of extreme judicial corruption by attorneys and judges.

     If American adult citizens leave it up to them, "they" will never take the corrective actions that are badly needed to investigate, prosecute, and punish appropriately unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorneys, lawyers, trial court judges, and/or appellate court judges.  They are the "untouchables."

     There are responsible and sensible ways to do this effectively, but "they" obviously are not going to do this by their own "in-house" efforts because they have had more than 200 years to accomplish those duties, and they haven't even gotten started yet.  Why?  Because honest and responsible investigations and punishment actions would tarnish their public image, and they are not going to voluntarily allow that to happen - never!!! 

     They have had 200+ years to develop effective ways to monitor, investigate, and discipline their own members (the "legal brotherhood") but they have not done that

     They needed to establish reasonable and sensible economically feasible ways of providing honest responsible consideration of citizen's complaints about unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions by attorneys, lawyers, and judges, but they have not done that during the past 200+ years.  Are they ever going to do that?  Of course not - because those badly needed responsible actions would tarnish their fraudulent public image.

     It is clear that they need to provide responsible investigative and disciplinary actions, but it is also clear that they are not willing to do that.  Lon Willoughby's 20+ years of trying to communicate with them about those situations has proven conclusively that they have no intentions of accomplishing those badly needed reforms.  They don't even try to evaluate very important honest responsible reports about those needed actions.

     In one of Lon Willoughby's appeals, the appellate court judges struck his entire Initial Brief (that he had spent hundreds of hours drafting) because they did not want to hear about the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions that had been taken against him by the trial attorneys and the trial court judge below.  He was instructed to refile his Initial Brief without any complaints about the attorneys or the trial court judge.

     When he refiled the Initial Brief, they again struck major argument issues out of the Initial Brief because they did not like his revised honest argument issues.  Needless to say, he eventually lost that appeal with an Affirmed, Per Curium decision with no legal opinions.  That was a very easy way for the appellate judges to avoid getting involved in a responsible way to take actions about the very obvious unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt litigation and judicial actions taken in the trial court below - those actions were clearly reported in the Record on Appeal (contained a transcript record that provided official proof about Appellant Willoughby's Initial Brief complaints). 

     The three appellate court judges simply Affirmed, Per Curium all of the obvious unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation and judicial actions taken against defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  in the trial court below.  The entire appeal process was a criminal-minded fraud upon defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. and a heinous fraud upon the appeal process.


Important National News

About Appellate Court Judges

     Relevant news flash:  August 7, 2018 - West Virginia's House Judiciary Committee adopted articles of impeachment against all sitting justices of the state's Supreme Court of Appeals - accusing the justices of corruption, incompetency, maladministration, neglect of duty, and certain high crimes and misdemeanors.

     News flash update:   August 14, 2018 - West Virginia's House of Delegates voted on the articles of impeachment and they did vote to impeach all sitting justices of the Supreme Court.  The impeachment case will now move into the Senate for an impeachment trial.

      This situation clearly illustrates that there are judicial situations where the state's elected representatives must take actions to protect the state's citizens from selfish self-serving self-appointed arrogant pompous narcissistic "elitist" aristocratic judicial despots and tyrants that simply cannot conduct themselves in a fair, honest, honorable, and reasonable manner. 

     They seem to be compelled by their absolute judicial authoritative control and power to act selfishly, unfairly, unethically, and corruptly whenever they want to do so.  After all, who is going to do something about their abusive self-serving despotic judicial actions?  Well, the Supreme Court Justices in West Virginia are learning for the first time ever that the people's elected representatives can do something about conditions that they feel are an abusive and unethical use of judicial power.  


"Power tends to corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

Sir John Dalberg-Acton, 8th Baronet: 1/10/1834 - 6/19/1902

You can research this information at www.Wikipedia.org

     This special report will enable you to easily learn about the abusive unfair and unethical judicial corruption actions taken against Lonnie Willoughby Jr.  You can learn from his personal experiences with the judicial systems over a 20+ years period of time.  Lon Jr. learned that judicial corruption is quite common in American courts - this revealing report proves this convincingly and conclusively.

     Lon Willoughby knows how to propose the legislative actions that are needed at the national level (U.S. Congress) and also at the state legislative level in various states to help get control of unfair and  unethical corrupt judicial actions by attorneys, lawyers, and judges (at all levels). 

     Lon Jr. realizes that there is no significant voter support for such legislation because most American citizens have not been educated about the extremely corrupt self-serving judicial conditions that are reported in this very important report.   Lon Willoughby is determined to provide the leadership and guidance that is needed to make major improvements in this national movement.

     Responsible caring patriotic-minded freedom-loving American visitors can help us take this report viral on the Internet by using E-mails and easy postings of information about this Website on their social media outlets - invite people to visit this very important and helpful Website and help Americans learn about this incredibly important Judicial Corruption Exposed Report. 

     Lon Willoughby says "Let's Make It Happen!!!Help us go viral with this vital information.


Uncomfortable Truth About

Judicial Systems in America

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. has taken responsible actions in this very special department to report uncomfortable truths about some of those corrupt narcissistic "elitist" aristocratic American despots and tyrants and clearly expose the outrageous level of in-house corruption that appears to be common routine practice in two specific professions in America.  (The legal profession and the various law enforcement professions.)

     We presume that there are a lot of good Americans working in both professions, but Lon knows for a fact that both professions are grossly irresponsible about allowing extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt criminal-minded selfish self-serving litigation actions against some innocent Americans. 

     Lon has also learned that both professions generally despise (hate) any American citizen who has sufficient honesty, integrity, and courage to make responsible attempts to expose such corruption

     Lon is confident that lots of Americans have been abused badly by arrogant "elitist" narcissistic members of the "legal brotherhood" in America; however, most of those abused litigants did not have the financial resources, or the communication skills and ability to develop a Website that can educate millions of Americans about the way that they were abused by members of the "legal brotherhood" in America.  Consequently, the public will never hear about the unfair and unethical abusive litigation schemes and tactics and judicial actions that wrecked their lives and their future goals for a good life in America.  

     If Lon Willoughby, Jr. and his wife Janie had not made the major financial sacrifices (for many years) that were needed for Lon to acquire the very important advanced level natural healthcare and wellness concepts educational knowledge and experience that he has obtained, this very important natural healthcare and wellness educational Website would not have been developed.

     If Lon Willoughby had not acquired the many technical skills needed to develop this educational Website (over a period of 26+ years), this very important and valuable Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts educational information would not be available at this special Website

     If Lon Willoughby had not acquired the personal litigation experiences and also acquired the extensive litigation knowledge that he has acquired, he would not have been able to develop this very special department that exposes a lot of unfair and unethical and corrupt judicial actions.

     Think for a few moments about how all of those very important things came together in one couple, Lon and Janie Willoughby, to make this very special Website possible for millions of Americans.

     Without this special Website, you would not have ever heard about the malicious and ruthless unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded litigation schemes and tactics that Lon Willoughby, Jr. has been subjected to by sadistic and vindictive attorneys and a series of "cooperative" trial court judges and "cooperative" appellate court judges for more than 20 years of ongoing abusive harassment, persecution, and punishment type litigation actions in the good ole' United States of America. And no one in law enforcement would do anything to help put a stop to that ruthless persecution.

     This exceptionally important Website can serve as a spokesperson for the thousands, hundreds of thousands, and perhaps millions of abused, harassed, and persecuted litigants who did not have the financial resources, and the communication skills, and the extensive technical skills that are needed to develop and produce a complex informative educational Website similar to this one.


Many Abused American Citizens

Finally Have An Effective Voice

     Now those Americans finally have an effective voice and some of their stories about malicious and ruthless judicial abuse, harassment, persecution, and extremely unreasonable punishment can be told through Lon Willoughby, Jr's report herein about similar litigation and judicial situations. 

     As president of ABC's of Health, Inc., doing business as ABC of Health, Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. is not going to allow millions of restricted access Americans ("them") to obtain access to our very special copyrighted and proprietary natural healthcare and wellness concepts (Phase Two and Phase Three Education at this Website).  "They" will only have access to our Free Phase One education, like all other American adult citizens who visit this Website, but they will not be allowed to qualify for access to our Free Phase Two Education or our Free Phase Three Education

    In addition, those restricted American citizens will not be allowed to qualify to lease one of our advanced natural healthcare and wellness concepts home-study education programsWe are not going to help unfair and unethical self-serving "elitist" American attorneys, lawyers, and judges become healthier and stronger, have more energy and vitality, and have better brain power, and become more effective and more productive with everything they do. 

    The extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt litigation and judicial situations reported in this department can help American visitors understand why we have implemented specific security evaluation standards for American citizens who may qualify as an Approved Qualified Visitor (AQV) or may qualify as a Certified Qualified Visitor (CQV) regarding the Free natural healthcare and wellness concepts education that we present for them respectively at this Website. 

     Some of those same security evaluation standards will also be involved in the tight security evaluation standards that we will use in our leasing security requirements for our Advanced Natural Healthcare and Wellness Concepts Home-study Education Programs    

     Visitors can review the information reported herein about the appalling and disgusting types of unfair, unethical, and corrupt "elitist" trial court attorney actions and judicial actions that non-resident litigant Lon Willoughby, Jr. was subjected to in a distant southern state's courts (trial courts and appellate courts) during 20+ years of ongoing related malicious and ruthless harassment actions.

     This Judicial Corruption Exposed department reports that non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was maliciously and ruthlessly harassed, persecuted, and punished repeatedly in an outrageously unfair, unethical, and despicable criminal-minded self-serving manner for more than 20 years by a series of trial attorneys, trial court judges, and appellate court judges.  That was done in an extremely "elitist" aristocratic unfair, unethical, and vindictive sadistic manner


Why Did Prominent "Officers of The Court" Do That?

     We will explain herein why they wanted to punish Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. severely.  We will also show that "they" understood that the legal profession and the judicial systems in the distant state were so inherently corrupted from within (from many years of extremely self-serving corrupt litigation practices) that "they" were very confident that they could take those extremely unfair and unethical criminal-minded litigation actions against non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. and get away with all of it.

     Lon will personally explain herein "their" selfish self-serving outrageously unfair and unethical criminal-minded motives for wanting to harass and persecute and punish him severely in a malicious and ruthless vindictive and sadistic manner.

     They did in fact get away with all of those cruel and ruthless vindictive actions in spite of Lon Willoughby's determined and diligent responsible efforts to report and expose those unfair and unethical litigation actions to appropriate authorities within the judicial systems and also within the law enforcement systems (state agencies and the FBI) - several times over a period of several years.    

     Consequently, Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (Lon Jr.) learned that the "judicial systems" in America have been severely corrupted to such an extent that they can easily be operated in an extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt self-serving manner any time "they" choose to make the "judicial systems" and/or the "law enforcement systems" operate that way for some citizens.

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. found that "they" can "operate" in an unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt self-serving manner to enable members of either "profession" (legal profession or law enforcement) to achieve their self-serving objectives, irrespective of reasonable and responsible fairness, well established ethics standards for both professions, and responsible consideration of relevant published legal case law decision standards.     

    

Very Important

Ethics Considerations

     It is very important for all American adult visitors to this department to understand that members of the "legal profession" (the "legal brotherhood") control both the judicial systems in America and the law enforcement prosecution systems in America.

     Pause and consider that members of the "legal brotherhood" control the judicial systems and the law enforcement prosecution systems in every county within each state of the USA.  Don't ever forget this - especially when you are voting for any political office candidate. 

     We have way too many members of the "legal brotherhood" in political office positions in most states in America, and we have way too many members of the "legal brotherhood" in the U.S. Congress in Washington, D.C. (the House of Representatives and the Senate)

     It is very important to always remember that "they" can be as unfair, unethical, and corrupt in a criminal-minded self-serving manner as they want to be, and "they" will have very little danger of being investigated responsibly.  There is almost no danger of them being prosecuted for unfair, unethical, criminal-minded self-serving actions. 

     Why is this true in almost all situations?  Because those investigative and prosecutorial actions will always be controlled by members of the "legal brotherhood."   They can make those actions come out the way they want them to come out for members of the "legal brotherhood."

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. learned that members of the self-appointed "elitist" aristocratic  "legal brotherhood" can easily operate the judicial systems unfairly and corruptly in their own self-interest - rather than conducting litigation responsibly in compliance with well-established legal standards that should always be applied in a fair manner - irrespective of their own self-serving aristocratic elitist autocratic desired outcome for a trial court litigation action or a trial court's adjudication action.  

     Their published State Bar Association's ethics standards require good responsible ethics from each member of the state's legal profession, but Lon Jr. repeatedly saw, again and again and again, that they routinely ignored those very good published professional ethics standards whenever it helped them accomplish their unfair and unethical self-serving litigation and/or judicial objectives. 

     In essence, "their" published Bar Association's ethics standards were just "window dressing" that were routinely ignored - blatantly and openly, by attorneys/lawyers, trial court judges, and also appellate court judges.  Lon saw those unethical actions numerous times over 20+ years - any time that "their" unfair, unethical, narcissistic selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic criminal-minded despotic and tyrannical litigation or adjudication actions were needed to achieve their "elitist" objectives for a trial court action or adjudication or and appellate court adjudication action. 

     The entire judicial process was an appalling and despicable unfair, unethical, and corrupt, fraudulent process consistently at the trial court level of litigation actions, and it was usually an extremely corrupt and fraudulent process at the appellate court level, but there was an occasional responsible appeal court decision - maybe about 20% of the time.  


Lon's Bar Association

Complaint Action - 1989

     Non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. made a very responsible complaint to the state's Bar Association at their office about the gross lack of honesty and ethics of two "opposing" attorneys during a civil litigation process that had recently been completed in that state.  (The plaintiff's attorney and defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's "defense" attorney.) 

     All of Lon Jr's diligent work in personally delivering his well documented 500+ pages complaint (included a 267 page two-volume transcript of a one-day trial) was a total waste of his time and efforts - his complaint documentary development time, travel time (about 180 miles), and the hours of time involved and the cost involved for making 500+ pages of photocopies to fully support his specific complaints about attorney actions. 

     The Bar Association did nothing responsible about investigating Lon Willoughby's very serious complaints about the two unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt attorneys.  The Bar Association notified each attorney by USPS mail that Lon Jr. had filed a complaint about their trial court actions in said case.  Each attorneys responded with a simple denial - saying that they had not done anything wrong during the litigation process. 

     The Bar Association mailed Lon Willoughby, Jr. a copy of their individual responses without providing any instructions as to what actions he would be allowed to take at that point.  That was apparently the end of the complaint actions;  the Bar Association made no further contact with complainant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. about his well-documented detailed complaints.

     The Bar Association's attorney obviously did not evaluate Lon Willoughby, Jr's detailed complaint report or the 267 page trial transcript that proved conclusively that the plaintiff's attorney had perpetrated a heinous ambush complaints scheme during the one-day equity court trial and that ambush complaints scheme was used by the trial court judge to remove defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. as an active co-trustee for said Trust Agreement Estate.  

     The Bar Association's attorney obviously did not evaluate the trial transcript's indisputable record proof that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's "defense" attorney had obviously "cooperated" with the plaintiff's attorney's heinous "ambush complaint scheme" - in a collusive and conspiratorial manner. 

     The "defense" attorney had made four objections during the trial to the introduction of the surprise complaints, and his four objections had been overruled instantly by the trial court judge as deficient and incompetent objections.  Those grossly deficient objections  had effectively enabled the heinous unfair, unethical ambush complaints scheme to be successful during that one-day non-jury "equity court" trial. 

     The Bar Association's attorney was certainly familiar with the state's Supreme Court landmark case law decision that clearly prohibited surprise (ambush) complaints during trials in that state, but the Bar Association's attorney gross lack of responsible actions in that regard simply ignored the very serious ethics violations that occurred when each attorney ignored that controlling mandatory directive. 

     The Bar Association's attorney's review ignored the obvious very serious ethics violation that occurred when the trial court's circuit court judge also ignored that controlling mandatory Supreme Court directive - no surprise complaints during trials    

     The state's Bar Association's lack of responsible actions regarding all of those valid complaint issues showed that they were essentially a union operation that would do anything feasible to "defend and protect" their bar members from responsible well documented complaints.  (members of the "elitist" aristocratic "legal brotherhood")

     The Bar Association failed to conduct a responsible investigation of Lon Willoughby's complaints, and they failed to provide any disciplinary actions for the two attorneys regarding very valid complaints about the two member attorney's gross lack of fairness, honesty, ethics, and integrity during the non-jury one-day trial that was conducted on September 8, 1989

     The transcript record copy proved beyond any doubt that they clearly violated the state Bar Association's ethics standards - severely and repeatedly .  But the Bar Association took no actions to discipline in any manner the two extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorneys.  Lon learned that filing a detailed serious complaint with them was a total waste of time, his costs, and his travel time and travel expenses. 

     Their own gross deficiency of responsible actions regarding Lon Willoughby, Jr's valid well-documented complaints proved convincingly that they had no responsible ethics at all in complying with their own ethics standards.  They totally failed to responsible enforce their own ethics standards with the two unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorneys and the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt circuit court judge (who was also a member of the state's Bar Association).

     As stated previously, their very good published ethics standards are  only "window dressing" for gullible public consumption.  In actuality, "their" very good published ethics standards are effectively a heinous self-serving farce and fraud upon the public.


Unfair, Unethical, and

Corrupt Litigation Actions

      In the civil litigation involving Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (Lon Jr.) as a co-trustee of his deceased father's trust estate, the judicial systems involved (trial court system and the appellate court system) were operated in an extremely unfair, unethical, and despicably corrupt criminal-minded selfish self-serving manner to enable the judicial systems to maliciously and ruthlessly harass, persecute, and punish Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. repeatedly in a sadistic vindictive manner as if he was a corrupt thief.

     They developed several motives for taking those despicable litigation and judicial actions.  It all started because Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had conscientiously and responsibly helped his aging parents establish an excellent Trust Agreement estate management and estate settlement plan that susbsequently enabled the Willoughby family to minimize federal estate taxes (to zero) and also reduce probate process expenses to a minimum amount (less than $400.00) when Lon Jr's father died on November 22, 1986. 

      After the two Trust Agreements were developed and implemented - one for each of his parents in January 1983, Lon Jr. realized that the Trust Agreements were deficient in two important areas:
    
     1. The Trust Agreements did not contain provisions that would enable the management flexibility needed by the two co-trustees (parent's two grown sons) to manage the Willoughby trust estate in the way that his parents wanted the trust estate to be managed currently and after Mr. Willoughby's death. 
   
     The estate planning attorney who drafted the Trust Agreements did not provide essential information that the co-trustees needed to have and understand in order to begin properly funding the Trust Agreements with the Willoughby's jointly owned estate values.  The attorney did not even mention the need for those funding actions when the two trust agreements were initiated in 1/1983

     Fortunately, son Lonnie Jr. understood that a trust agreement estate that has no assets assigned to the trust estate is as useless as a bank account that has no funds.  If no financial or property assets are transferred into the trust estate, there are no assets for the two co-trustees to manage appropriately. 

     The attorney who drafted the Trust Agreements surely understood that very important issue.  He knew, or should have known, that the two Trust Agreements that he had drafted for Lon Jr's parents at a cost of $700+ were actually useless documents - if nothing else was done to enable the two documents to become useful to the Willoughby family.

     2.  The Trust Agreements would not have enabled any federal estate tax savings for the Willoughby family.  Lon Jr. had enough knowledge about those issues to realize that federal estate taxes could be legally avoided if the Trust Agreements were amended and then funded in the proper way to accomplish that objective; however, he did not have enough knowledge about those special technicalities to understand what to do with a total estate value of about 1.2 million dollars.

     Lon Jr. realized that the Trust Agreements would need to be amended to accomplish the very important tax savings objective, and some other important management objectives, but he did not know how the amendment document should be worded to make those multiple objectives possible.   
   
     At that point in time, Lon Jr. had lost confidence in the initial estate planning attorney's estate planning knowledge, and he had also lost confidence in the attorney's honesty and integrity because he had apparently deliberately "avoided" telling Lon Jr. and his parents about the need for funding the Trust Agreement.  Consequently, Lon Jr. starting consulting with other estate planning type attorneys about developing an appropriate amendment document for the two Trust Agreements. 

     Unfortunately, Lon Jr. had a lot of difficulty in trying to locate an estate planning attorney in the distant state who apparently knew how to properly draft an amendment for the Willoughby Trust Agreement documents that could correct the two major deficiencies identified above. 

    The five additional estate planning attorneys that Lon Jr. consulted with over time apparently did not know how to accomplish those objectives (or were not willing to do that).  Lon Jr. realized that it was possible to accomplish those very important objectives with an appropriate amendment to the Trust Agreements, but he did not know how to go about drafting that amendment document. 

     He was confident that an appropriate amendment was needed to enable the two co-trustees to accomplish his parent's mutually agreed upon objectives for managing the Willoughby trust estate.  He also realized that the two co-trustees needed additional management flexibility to properly fund the trust estate value to legally avoid about $225,000 in federal estate taxes, and the co-trustees needed additional management flexibility to properly manage the settlement of the trust estate after Lon Jr's father's death - which was anticipated to occur at any time due to his very poor health.  

 Common-place Corrupt 

Practices in American Courts

     Self-serving judicial corruption is apparently common-place practice in American courts.  This was  clearly demonstrated numerous times in the ongoing 20+ years of related malicious litigation actions that Lon Willoughby, Jr. (Lon) was subjected to by dishonest, unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded corrupt attorneys, operating in a very cooperative manner with a series of dishonest, unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt trial court judges, and cooperative appellant court judges, as reported herein.

     Lon also learned that self-serving judicial corruption can go all the way up to the nine justices sitting on the Supreme Court of the United States (and be conveniently ignored by them).  Lon Willoughby, Jr. went to a lot of trouble, and a tremendous amount of preparation documentary work, and substantial expenses to submit two separate appeal cases to the high court.  Both appeal cases exposed extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions in the trial court and in the relevant appellate court. 

     In each of Lon's appeals, the individual law clerks that worked for each of the nine justices of the Supreme Court presumably made a quick preliminary review of Lon's petition "book" and then made a recommendation to the respective justice that they work for (recommend that you hear this case or - recommend you not hear this case). 

     The nine justices meet periodically to vote on a number of cases - vote to hear this case (seriously review this case) or don't hear this case.  It's called the "rule of four" - if four of the nine justices vote to hear the appeal petition, the appeal will be heard.  If less than four justices vote to review the appeal petition, the case will not be heard.  In that event, the petitioner will subsequently get a mailed response from the high court that states:  Petition denied.

     Please keep in mind that the high court receives thousands of petitions each year requesting a review of appeal decisions made in the appellate courts (either state appellate court decisions or federal appellate court decisions).  The fact that the high court receives thousands of such petitions each year is clear evidence that a lot of abusive unfair and unethical appellate court decisions are rendered in America each year.

     For every appeal petition that the high court receives, there are probably 500 times that many unfair, unethical, and corrupt self-serving appeal decisions rendered in the appellate courts (state appellate courts and federal appellate courts).  Yes, it can be that bad, and it may in fact be a lot worse than that. 

     It is important to understand that most litigants cannot afford having a law firm draft and file an appeal petition in the U.S. Supreme court.  Also realize that there is almost no chance that a petition will be heard (reviewed) by the high court.  Consequently, most  appeal attorneys will not recommend filing a petition with the high court because they realize that it will likely be a very expensive exercise in litigation futility.

     In Lon's two separate petition situations, he inquired to learn that all nine justices voted to not hear each of his appeal petitions.  Consequently, each justice voted to do nothing about the extremely corrupt judicial actions that Lon's detailed appeal petition reported - with exact duplicate retyped (for appropriate sizing) documented official litigation records that clearly showed very strong preliminary evidence of Lon's legitimate complaints to the high court.

     Lon learned that the nine justices sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court can easily "allow" lower courts (trial courts and appellate courts) to get away with extremely unfair and unethical judicial actions.  The high court can simply choose to not review appeal petition complaints about outrageously unfair and corrupt self-serving judicial decisions by a state appellate court or by a federal appellate court. 

     The high court typically gets thousands of appeal cases submitted annually, but they choose to  hear only about 50 to 60 cases per year.  There are a few types of cases that they are required to hear (litigation disputes between states, etc.) so those special cases further reduce the chances of getting a conventional appeal petition heard - they only review a limited number of cases each year. 

     The potential chance of getting an appeal petition heard by the high court for most typical civil litigation cases is much less than a 1% chance (typically 0.04% or less).  Like petitioner Lon Willoughby, Jr. at that time, most litigants do not know this. 

     Most litigants do not know that for almost all civil cases and most criminal cases, the large amount of time required to prepare a complex appeal petition (in the small book format that is required), and the expenses for printing and shipping 40 copies of the appeal petition to the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC is almost always a hopeless cause. The petition will very likely not be heard.

      Consequently, it is very easy for state appellate court judges and federal appellate court judges to get away with rendering extremely unfair, unethical, and fraudulent criminal-minded judicial decisions that are favorable in a very selfish self-serving way for the "elitist" legal brotherhood (American citizens who are members of the American legal profession in some capacity - attorneys, lawyers, and judges). 

     Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. now understands that it is very easy for unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded self-serving fraudulent appellant court judicial decisions to be made by various appellant courts in numerous situations (state appellate courts and also federal appellate courts) .  

     Lon Willoughby has filed more than ten appeal cases and about 80% of them received unfair, unethical, self-serving appellate court decisions that were extremely damaging to Appellate Willoughby but were very beneficial in a selfish self-serving way for some member(s) of the "legal brotherhood." 

     Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was subjected to numerous appeal decision situations of that type.  He exposed very serious unfair and unethical trial court judicial corruption to the appropriate appellate court numerous times, and he was usually punished for having done so (by losing his valid appeal).

     Lon Jr. went to a lot of trouble with very detailed legal work that prepared complex legal briefs with documentary evidential references throughout the appeal brief - references to the "Record on Appeal" (official records from the trial court records, transcripts of motion hearings and transcripts of trial court proceedings).   Those references to the official records for the case proved convincingly that the  argument issues presented in his appeal's Initial Brief were valid argument issues and were clearly supported by official evidential records for the litigation in the trial court below. 

     NOTE:  The Record on Appeal provides a complex detailed documentary record of what happened in the trial court litigation over time so the appellate court's panel of judges have an adequate record to review when each appellate judge is making their judicial decision(s) about appeal argument issues.  Consequently, an appeal process is complex, difficult, and expensive for the person filing an appeal.

     Non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. spent many thousand of dollars on transcript costs for numerous motion hearings and trial court proceedings.  He also spent thousands of dollars on appeal case filing fees, and he spent additional thousands of dollar for the clerk of court fees for preparation of the "Record on Appeal" by the deputy clerks (for his numerous appeal cases).  They prepare the record requested by the appellant in an appeal and then ship those records to the appellate court.

     Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. filed more than ten responsible appeals, and he personally drafted, submitted, and prosecuted his respective responsible appeal complaints during the 20+ years litigation process.  Most of his multiple appeals complaint issues were subsequently Affirmed, Per Curium with no legal opinion for the appeal case.  

     NOTE: The Affirmed, Per Curium appeal decision means that the appellate panel of judges all agreed to approve all of the lower court's judicial actions that were complained about in the appellant's appeal Initial Brief.  Consider that filing an appeal is a complex, difficult, and expensive litigation process.  A sensible litigant does not file an appeal unless there was some serious miscarriage of justice in the trial court actions. 

     It is important to understand that the records show that most appeal cases are decided against the appellant and in favor of the unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions and judicial actions that the appellant had complained about with his appeal.

     In regards to Willoughby's appeal actions, the three judge appellate panel knowingly and willfully refused to provide a written legal opinion for most of Lon Willoughby's appeal cases.  Why?  Because there was no responsible legal basis for ruling against appellant Lon Willoughby. 

     The evidence in the "Record on Appeal" strongly supported Willoughby's appeal argument issues, and the numerous relevant case law decisions that were cited, referenced, and quoted from in each of his appeal's Initial Brief (one for each appeal) also clearly showed that his argument complaint issues were valid.  Each of his pro se filed appeal Initial Briefs showed a strong legitimate basis for a reversal of the unfair and unethical (and usually corrupt and fraudulent) trial court's decision or judgment against non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     Consequently, the appellate court's three judge panel's Affirmed, Per Curium decision (with no written legal opinion for the case) provided no information at all about why all three judges refused to accept any of appellant Lon Willoughby's argument issues as being valid reasons for reversing the trial court's decision or "judgment" against him.    

     The appellate judges simply decided to approve the unfair, unethical, and corrupt (and usually fraudulent) trial court's litigation actions (the judicial adjudication actions that Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had complained about in each of his appeal's Initial Brief). 

     It is very important for American adult visitors to understand that each of Lon Willoughby's "lost appeal cases" provided some self-serving unfair and unethical benefits to some members of the legal profession (the legal brotherhood).  They repeatedly won in the appeal litigation process simply because the three appellate judges caused appellant Willoughby to "lose" in numerous appeal cases. 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. is confident that he should have won in every appeal that he filed.  He would not have gone to all of that trouble and litigation work and the substantial expenses involved if he had not had a strong basis for reversal of the trial court judge's unfair and improper (usually corrupt and fraudulent) decision or judgment against defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     Out of his 20+ years of experience with self-appointed "elitist" aristocratic autocratic trial court judges and appellate court judges who were in fact usually corrupt selfish self-serving despots and tyrants, Lon Willoughby, Jr. now understands that the appeal process is usually as unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt (in a self-serving way for the "legal brotherhood") as the trial court judicial actions below that were complained about in each of his appeals (in the multiple argument issues identified and then reported in the Initial Brief filed for each appeal).


Lon's Complaints To

The U.S. Supreme Court 

   The state's appellate court judges consistently took no judicial actions that could help stop the unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions in the trial courts below - that Lon Jr. reported in his appeals.

     Lon also went to a lot of trouble and did hundreds of hours of complex legal work at substantial expense, to report some of those judicial actions to the U.S. Supreme Court in two separate appeals - Petition for a Writ of Certiorari that he filed with the high court in Washington, D.C. 

     As stated previously, the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court each voted to take no judicial actions that might have helped correct the very serious judicial harm that had been done to litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. with malicious and ruthless litigation schemes and tactics that demonstrated extremely unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded self-serving sadistically corrupt judicial actions. 

     Those unfair and unethical "judicial actions" had been taken against litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in an elitist manner by "officers of the courts" below.  Those were self-serving unfair and unethical criminal-minded attorneys and "very cooperative and helpful" self-serving unfair and unethical criminal-minded judges - a trial court judge and then the appellate court's three-judge appellate panel.

     Each of Lon's two separate appeal petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court reported how he had been maliciously and ruthlessly harassed and persecuted by an unfair and unethical criminal-minded attorney and a "cooperative and helpful" unfair, unethical, criminal-minded trial court judge and those judicial actions were then further compounded by "cooperative" appellate court judges who refused to overturn those obviously unfair and unethical criminal-minded corrupt trial court judicial actions. 

     NOTE: It is important to understand that all of the unfair and unethical criminal-minded attorneys and judges involved in the actions reported herein were "officers" of the respective courts involved. 

     Lonnie Willoughby had to accomplish a large amount of legal research work and a lot of legal brief writing work to draft, and word process, and publish his detailed legal petition brief for each high court appeal case in the small book format that was required.  (His two appeal petitions were filed several years apart.)

     The special appeal procedures for the high court required each petitioner to publish their appeal legal brief, a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, in book format with bound covers similar to other paperback books, with pages printed on both sides of the paper (just like a regular small size book).  

     The special appeal procedures also required that petitioner Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. ship the high court 40 copies of his published "book style" legal brief petition (for each one of his appeal cases). 

     Lon Jr. had substantial expenses and a lot of lost regular work time while he spent hundreds of hours developing his petition to the high court about the "unfair, unethical and outrageously corrupt judicial actions" that had been taken against him in the trial court that were subsequently affirmed (approved) by the state's appellate court (below the high court).  Petitioner Lon Jr. had to do all of that detailed laborious work for each of his two separate appeal petitions to the U. S. Supreme Court.

     The appeal petition brief (a small size book) had to contain exhibit documents from official court records in the trial court and from the appeal case below, but no photo copies of any evidential documents were allowed - due to the small published book format that was required for a "petition" to the high court (pages about 6.5 inches wide and 9 inches high).  Consequently, all evidential documents (court orders, court record documents, many transcript pages, etc.) had to be retyped completely with a specified font size, word for word.  All exhibit documents had to fit into the small book format that was required (much smaller than 8 1/2 inch by 11 inch copy paper). 

     NOTE:  That small book format requirement is an idiotic and stupid government requirement.  Consider that the high court typically receives thousands of appeal petitions per year, and 40 copies of each appeal petition is required to be submitted in this idiotic unreasonable small book size format that prevents making any photocopies of any evidential documents for said "petition book."  Everything in the Petition has to be retyped to fit into the 6.5 inch by 9 inch small book format.

     If the court would allow petitions to be filed in the normal 8.5 inch by 11 inch size format, photocopies of evidential documents, orders, transcript records, etc. could be allowed and that would reduce the work involved for compiling a Petition for Writ of Certiorari by about 50% to 60% or more.

      Lon Willoughby's appeal petition very responsibly reported to the nine justices of the high court in some detail the extremely unfair, unethical, and criminal-mindedly corrupt judicial actions that had occurred in the two lower courts - judicial actions in the trial court and then judicial actions in the appellate court that "Affirmed" (approved) the disputed trial court actions (with no legal opinion). 

    As it turned out for each of Lon's two appeal cases (submitted several years apart), all of those tedious preparatory work actions were a total waste of Lon's time - all of his diligent hundreds of hours of laborious work efforts, and the substantial expenses involved with printing and shipping 40 copies of each appeal petition to the high court in Washington, D.C.  There are very important time limits for filing an appeal petition.

     Lon learned that submitting an important appeal petition to the high court is almost always an exercise in judicial futility - almost all appeal petitions to the high court are denied (not heard).  Those petitioners will eventually receive a letter in the mail from the high court, on the court's letterhead stationary, that simply states:  Petition denied. 
Remember, the high court chooses to "hear" only 50 to 60 appeal petitions per year. 

    The responsive order that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. finally received from the high court regarding each  appeal petition was like that:  Petition denied.  That was it, nothing more.  After all of that laborious preparatory work and substantial expense - just those two very disappointing words. 

     So you now know how the system works for appeal petitions to the high court.  Lon Willoughby recommends that you forget about it, don't attempt it, because your chances of being heard is almost 0% unless you have a very important novel type case that has not been heard before by the high court. In that situation, your case may be heard if it will allow the court to set a very important precedent - such as a few of the unique appeal decisions that you may have heard about on the national news. 


First Appeal to the

U.S. Supreme Court

     Lon's first appeal to the high court was about a state court civil case that had gone through the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt elitist trial court, and had then gone through the unfair, unethical, and corrupt elitist state appellate court (all were actions in a distant southern state). 


Second Appeal to the

U.S. Supreme Court

      Lon's second appeal to the high court occurred several years later, after a related civil case had gone through the unfair, unethical and corrupt self-serving elitist federal trial court and had then gone through the very unfair, and unethical, and extremely self-serving corrupt elitist federal appellate court. If you could review all of the unfair, unethical litigation schemes and tactics that were used by several attorneys to cause plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose that trial court case, you would likely be appalled, dismayed, and angered that such tactics could be successful with a federal court judge.


Our "Justice" Department

At Another Website    

     Our ABC of Health dot biz Website contains a Justice department that presents Lon Willoughby's "short story" (15 pages) that reports some of the appalling and disgustingly unfair and corrupt judicial situations that he experienced over 20+ years of ongoing litigation actions involving several state trial court judges and state appellate court judges in a distant southern state's elitist judicial system

     All visitors to this Website are authorized to visit that Website and review Lon's report about those extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation actions and resultant judicial actions.

     Lon Willoughby was a non-resident litigant in the distant state's litigation actions, and he was consistently treated like a foreigner (from another country) although he is a natural-born American citizen, and a 4-years military veteran, and he had served an additional 19 years as a federal government employee with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  (23 years of federal service) 

     Lon gradually learned that the "elitist-minded" attorneys and judges in the distant state had no respect for his natural-born citizenship, and no respect for his responsible military or government service, and no respect for his protected civil rights pursuant to the Constitution of the United States, and no respect for his protected civil rights pursuant to the State Constitution of that distant state. 

     He gradually learned that those elitist-minded despots and tyrants thought that they could do no wrong and they apparently thought that non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could do no right.  They were consistently unfair and unethical criminal-minded elitist despots and tyrants who obviously believed that they could do anything they wanted to do in the litigation process and get away it - any of their "elitist" selfish self-serving unfair and unethical criminal-minded litigation schemes and tactics. 

     Lon quickly learned that "local" trial attorneys and "local" trial judges generally know each other well and work together closely in case after case - for years in many situations.  In general they can conspiratorially decide ahead of trial how they "agree" for the trial court litigation to turn out, and they can then be as dishonest, devious, scheming, unethical, and ruthlessly corrupt as necessary to make the case outcome come out the way they had already decided that it "should" turn out. 

     In defendant Co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby Jr's initial trial court litigation in September 1989, the two opposing attorneys and the trial court judge apparently collusively manipulated the case to make it come out the way they wanted it to come out, in direct conflict with the controlling legal standards that were relevant, and in conflict with the factual evidence that was disclosed during Lon's several hours of testimony at trial, and in conflict with the legal system's relevant ethics standards that the attorneys and the judge were supposed to honor and comply with (but violated severely in several ways).

     In some litigation cases, like Lon's initial civil "equity court" case in September 1989, the trial is just an amusing and entertaining "show" for the two opposing attorneys (plaintiff's attorney and the defendant's "defense attorney") and the trial court judge - with them being the three self-serving dishonest elitist actors in the "litigation show" (for their own amusement and entertainment).  It is important to understand that the opposing attorneys are usually paid handsomely for their acting performance in the "litigation show" and the trial court judge also gets paid well for his participation.

     A few years later, Lon Willoughby, was litigating pro-se (litigating without assistance of legal counsel) in that same distant state's trial court in an effort to responsibly prosecute a very important civil complaint about an extremely dishonest, deceitful, and outrageously corrupt trial court "defense attorney" that had willfully betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's confidence and trust and his very important litigation interest during the "equity court" trial in September 1989.  The "defense attorney" had knowingly and willfully allowed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to be "ambushed during the trial" with five surprise complaint issues that had not been noticed in the plaintiff's pleadings (the Complaint against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr). 

     For simplicity of identification, we will henceforth sometimes identify that "defense attorney" with the acronym FDA (former defense attorney).

     NOTE:  Lon had subsequently learned that the relevant legal standards established by that state's Supreme Court specified that the plaintiff's pleadings must identify all of the issues to be tried during trial, and no surprise issues (ambush issues) are allowed to be brought in during trial - unless both parties mutually agreed to adjudicate the new complaint issue(s).

     The "defense attorney's" betrayal of his client's very important litigation interests occurred in September 1989 in a civil lawsuit that was supposed to resolve a family member dispute about monthly distributions of trust income to three beneficiaries of the Willoughby family trust estate. 

     The defense attorney's "betrayal actions" of co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. were extreme legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud to an outrageous level - especially so for a very intelligent and prominent attorney with about twenty-two years of attorney experience in that state's court system. 

     The two opposing attorneys involved in the one-day "equity court" trial (jury not allowed), and the circuit court judge that conducted the non-jury "equity court" trial in September 1989, were extremely dishonest elitist "officers of the court" and the three of them deliberately made a sadistic catastrophic mess out of a rather simple family member dispute about monthly distributions of income from the trust estate to three primary beneficiaries of the trust estate's substantial assets.

     The three "officers of the court" took those extremely unfair, dishonest, and outrageously corrupt judicial actions due to their criminal-minded collusive "elitist objectives" of maliciously and ruthlessly persecuting and punishing defendant co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. in an extremely severe manner

     Why would two prominent local attorneys and a local circuit court judge collusively scheme to unfairly and corruptly punish severely an out-of-state defendant co-trustee in a malicious and ruthless manner about a relatively simple family member dispute about distribution amounts of monthly income from a family Trust Estate for a "local area" beneficiary? (She lived in the county where the court was located.)  In order to understand these situations, we need to review some background information.


Background Information About

Relevant Trust Agreement Documents

     In the spring of 1982, Lon Willoughby, Jr. helped his aging parents try to establish an excellent estate management and estate settlement trust plan, using the services of an experienced estate planning attorney that was recommended by the trust department of a major bank (in the distant state). 

     The recommended estate planning attorney subsequently drafted a pair of mirror image Trust Agreements for Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's parent's jointly-owned estate.  Those two Trust Agreements (near identical Trust Agreements) for Mr. and Mrs. Lonnie Willoughby Sr. were initially developed and prepared by the recommended estate planning attorney (in that same distant state). 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. lived in South Carolina, and he communicated briefly one time with said attorney by telephone during his drafting of the two very similar trust agreements (one for each parent).

     Unfortunately, the estate planning attorney did not complete the estate planning work in a fully competent manner, and Lon was knowledgeable enough about the estate planning issues involved to subsequently recognize a very serious deficiency.  Lon later realized that additional legal actions were needed to amend both trust agreements to establish and clarify some very important legal issues

     At that point in time, he had lost confidence in the attorney's estate planning skill level and in his honesty and integrity.   Consequently, Lon consulted with other attorneys in that state about those issues.  Initially, this was a very awkward situation for Lon Jr. because he was about 500 miles away from the distant state.

     However, Lon and his wife Janie moved to that state in July 1983, to take over and manage his parent's business due to Lon's father's paralyzed condition and his very poor general health condition.  That situation made it much more convenient for Lon to consult with some local area attorneys (in that state) about amending his parent's individual Trust Agreements to correct their deficient condition.

      Over a period of several months, Lon Jr. was not able to find any nearby attorney in that state that was knowledgeable enough to help Lon Jr. get his parent's respective Trust Agreements amended.

     NOTE:  It is important for visitors to understand that estate planning is a rare specialty in legal practice, and most trial attorneys know practically nothing about complex estate planning actions. 

     After consulting with five additional attorneys during those months, Lon had run out of time for finding an attorney who could help his parents amend their Trust Agreements appropriately.  Time was very important in this matter because Lon's father was in very bad health

     Mr. Lonnie Willoughby, Sr. had already had multiple heart attacks and a very bad stroke (that had left him paralyzed totally on the left side of his body - from his left shoulder to the toes on his left foot).  He could not even turn himself in bed.  He also had a pacemaker installed in his chest area to help regulate his heart beats. 

     Lonnie Jr. realized that his father was subject to die at any time, and the Trust Agreement amendment actions needed to be drafted and completed while Lon's father was healthy enough mentally to make important decisions about how he wanted his trust estate management to work currently and after he died. 

     Lon realized that the Trust Agreement's amending document would require his father's notarized signature to make the amendment effective.  The amendment document was necessary to enable his two co-trustees (his two grown sons) to take appropriate desired administrative actions currently and also after their father died. 

     Lon Jr. understood his father's personal opinions and desires about those important estate planning issues because Lon had discussed those issues with each parent individually and had then discussed those same issues with both parents together.

     Because he had been unable to locate an adequately skilled estate planning attorney in the distant state, Lon Jr. reluctantly decided to purchase some estate planning legal books and try to learn how to personally draft the needed amendment document for each of his parent's Trust Agreement

     Fortunately, Lon Jr. was able to accomplish those objectives; he learned how to draft the legal documents that would amend each of the two Trust Agreements appropriately so the trusts could work to achieve the management objectives that his parents desired for their jointly-owned estate value.   Lon's personal efforts to amend the two Trust Agreements were completed on December 12, 1985.

     Lon and Janie had worked very hard for about 18 months to get Lon's parent's business in much better condition, and the business was scheduled to be sold in January 1985 so Lon's parents could finally retire.  Janie moved back to South Carolina in December 1984, to begin teaching school again at the Mauldin High School in January 1985, after the Christmas break.  She was able to live with one of her female school teacher friends while Janie's home was under lease rental. 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. stayed behind in the distant state to complete the scheduled business sale in January 1985.  He then moved to the area where his parents lived to help them cope with the very difficult situation that they were in due to his father's very poor health (for an unknown period of time).

     In March 1986, Lon was finally able to move back to their home in South Carolina.  The lease rental on their home had expired, and Lon and Janie could finally start putting their life back together as a married couple, living in their home that had been rented since July 1983.

     Lon's efforts to amend the two Trust Agreements were very successful.  His father's Amended Trust Agreement worked perfectly when Mr. Lonnie Willoughby, Sr. died on November 22, 1986.  The excellent "Amended Trust Agreement" enabled the Willoughby family to avoid having to pay federal estate taxes of about $225,000 on Lonnie Willoughby Sr's taxable estate value. 

     The Amended Trust Agreement also enabled the Willoughby family to avoid probate legal expenses of $50,000+ on the deceased Mr. Willoughby's estate value.  Due to the estate planning work that Lon Jr. had accomplished, the probate court process to settle the estate was completed within 24 hours rather than taking several months or more, as is common for probate process completion. 

     Mr. Willoughby Sr's Amended Trust Agreement enabled the two co-trustees to accomplish those estate settlement actions quickly, conveniently, and at minimum expenses for both the probate judicial process and the federal estate tax savings issue. 


Trust Income 

Monthly Distribution Dispute

     More than two years later, in February 1989, one of the three primary beneficiaries of the trust estate (living in the distant state) sued co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby Jr. because he would not agree to pay the beneficiary as much monthly income from the trust estate as she started demanding. 

     Lon Jr. knew that the amount of income that she was demanding was excessive for her rightful share of the trust income, and Lon Jr. also knew that the amount was in excess of her financial needs.  Lon Jr. knew that she had more than $200,000 cash in her bank accounts, and her home and her car, a like new 98 Oldsmobile, were both paid for.  Lon Jr. also understood that she had no unusual monthly expenses.  She clearly did not need the excessive amount of trust income monthly that she demanded.

    She discussed that monthly payment dispute issue with a local attorney in the distant state, and he recommended that she allow him to file a lawsuit against co-trustee Lon Jr.  He anticipated that the pressure of her lawsuit (in a distant state) would force Lon Jr. (living about 500 miles away in South Carolina) to give in to her demands and agree to pay her the monthly trust income that she wanted. 

     That unfair and unreasonable plan did not work because Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was a very competent co-trustee, and he knew that he was being fair and reasonable about the amount of monthly income that the beneficiary should be receiving monthly for the trust income distribution to her. 

     Co-trustee Lon Jr. was knowledgeable about the beneficiary's financial circumstances, and he was confident that the beneficiary did not actually need additional monthly income from the Willoughby trust estate's limited modest income.  Consequently, the case went to trial with the female beneficiary in the distant state as the plaintiff and co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby Jr. (Lon Jr.) was the defendant.

     The circuit court's "equity court bench trial" (no jury) occurred in September 1989 and it lasted one full day.  Lon Willoughby, Jr. was on the witness stand giving testimony for hours that day - answering questions posed by the plaintiff's attorney and then answering questions posed by co-trustee Lonnie Jr's highly skilled "defense attorney."  Both attorneys lived in that area and they knew each other well.

     The "defense attorney" was a smart and capable trial attorney with about twenty-two years experience in that state's judicial system.  Co-trustee Lon Jr. knew that he had been a very competent responsible co-trustee, and he was confident that his very capable "defense" attorney would show that the two complaints filed against him in the plaintiff's Complaint were unreasonable and invalid.

     The two volume 267 page trial transcript that was prepared after the trial (at Lon Willoughby's request and expense) cost him $1,350.  The transcript reported the trial activities in word-for-word detail.  The transcript showed convincingly that the trial court judge and the two opposing attorneys (three "officers of the court") had no competent understanding of the inter vivos type Amended Trust Agreement (for the deceased Lonnie Willoughby, Sr.) that was involved in the litigation process.

     NOTE:  Most trial attorneys know little to nothing about complex estate planning issues because estate planning is a specialty area of law - most trial attorneys and most trial court judges have not been educated at all about special estate planning features using an inter vivos type trust agreement.

     The transcript also showed convincingly that those three "officers of the court" were incompetent to try to litigate the complex trust estate issues that the plaintiff's attorney unfairly and unethically injected into the trial as surprise "ambush complaints" against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  The plaintiff's attorney introduced five complex complaint issues during the trial proceeding that had not been noticed in any manner in the Complaint that said attorney had filed against co-trustee Lonnie Jr. 

     The transcript shows that the two opposing trial attorneys and the trial court judge didn't even understand the basis concepts involved with the Amended Trust Agreement regarding:

    1) reduction of federal estate taxation amount (down to zero dollars tax)

     2) reduction in probate processing costs and probate associated attorney fees and

    3) reduction in typical probate settlement time (24 hours time accomplished compared to months of usual probate settlement time)

     The three "officers of the court" obviously had never seen a sophisticated Amended Trust Agreement estate management and settlement plan of that type.  Those complex estate planning issues should not have been brought into the trial process unless the plaintiff had properly noticed those issues in her Complaint (pleadings) against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     If that had occurred properly, the "defense attorney" would have conducted discovery actions about those complex issues. The plaintiff's discovery affidavit testimony in June 1989 clearly   acknowledged that she did not have a mismanagement complaint against co-trustee Lonnie  Willoughby, Jr.  Remember this discovery affidavit testimony occurrence - it will be needed later.

     The "mismanagement complaint" came up for the first time after the trial was in progress.  Prior to the trial date, the plaintiff's attorney obviously realized that the Complaint that he had drafted and filed for the plaintiff against non-resident co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. did not contain a winnable argument issue, so he apparently developed his surprise "ambush complaints" strategy.  The "mismanagement complaint" was clearly the attorney's personal complaint strategy, it was not the plaintiff's complaint against her relative, the non-resident defendant co-trustee. Remember her affidavit testimony in June 1989 stated: there was no mismanagement.

     This situation illustrates how disgustingly unfair, unethical, and corrupt a trial attorney can be, trying to devise an unfair, unethical, and fraudulent "ambush scheme" to help him win a litigation contest that he finally realized he could not win in a fair, ethical, reasonable, and responsible manner. 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. will show herein that the "local" plaintiff's attorney was a sneaky, conniving, deceitful, lying scoundrel who had no honesty, no ethics, and no integrity at all.  Unfortunately, the very prominent "local" defense attorney that was representing co-trustee Lon Jr's also turned out to be an extremely unfair, unethical, corrupt, and untrustworthy scoundrel attorney. 

     Subsequent events, after the one-day non-jury trial that was conducted on September 8, 1989, indicated that the "defense" attorney had collusively and conspiratorially "cooperated" with the plaintiff's attorney's extremely unfair and unethical heinous "ambush complaints" scheme.  

     Lon Jr. gradually learned after the trial that his "defense" attorney was a sneaky, conniving, deceitful, lying scoundrel who had no responsible ethics, honesty, or integrity. 

     Lon Jr. learned that the two attorneys had lived in that county area for many years, and they knew each other well because they had previously worked together in the same law firm in that small town.

     Defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had a lot of confidence in his "defense" attorney when the trial began at 9:00 AM, but by the time the one-day non-jury trial was over at 5:00 PM, he had very serious doubts that the attorney had represented him in a competent responsible manner.  This was his first time ever in a trial so he did not know what to expect from the attorneys or the trial court judge. 

     It appeared that the "defense" attorney had allowed the plaintiff's attorney to ruthlessly "ambush" defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. with fabricated fraudulent surprise "ambush" complaint issues.  However, the defense attorney had objected four times to the introduction of those surprise complaint issues so it was clear that he had been defensive about that surprise complaints strategy.  It was disconcerting to realize that the trial court judge had instantly overruled all of those objections.

      Defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was therefore not provided with a fair and reasonable opportunity to prepare his defensive argument issues about complex estate planning issues and federal estate taxation issues that were being introduced as surprise complaints - to develop a surprise allegation that co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. had somehow mis-managed the trust estate.  

     Co-trustee Lon Willoughby had not been noticed about this new mis-management complaint prior to trial so he had no reason to go back four years and review complex estate planning issues that he had considered one time way back in 1985 when he was involved in getting the Trust Agreement amendment drafted (about four years prior to the day of trial on September 8, 1989). 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr was not an estate planning attorney.  He had acquired some knowledge about estate planning issues as a life insurance salesman.  He had only gone through this complex process one time during 1985, when he was trying to help his aging parents get the Trust Agreement amendment developed (for their Trust Agreements that had been implemented in January 1983).

     There was no reason for defendant co-trustee Lon Jr. to believe that those old complex trust estate planning issues would be raised during the trial because there was no information about those issues in the Plaintiff's Complaint, and there was no mention of those issues during the discovery issues conducted months before the trial date.  Consequently,  co-trustee Lon Jr. had not gone back in his records to review those old complex estate planning issues prior to the trial on September 8, 1989

     Co-trustee Lon Jr. did not get noticed that those old issues would be involved in the trial, and he went to court unprepared to defend himself competently about complex trust development and federal estate taxation issues that he had carefully considered one time about four years prior to the trial. 

     The plaintiff's attorney deliberately ambushed co-trustee Lon, Jr. during trial with five complex estate planning issues that were not noticed (identified as being relevant) in the plaintiff's pleadings (the Complaint against co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr.).  The plaintiff's attorney did not raise any of those issues during the discovery actions that had been completed prior to trial.

     During the trial, the plaintiff's attorney brought in a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) to give testimony about the surprise complaint issues, and that situation proved that this was a planned "ambush complaints scheme."  It is important to understand that the CPA was not admitted as an expert witness regarding the trust estate planning issues and federal estate taxation issues that were introduced during trial as surprise complaints against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     The fact that the CPA was not admitted as an expert witness regarding those surprise complaint issues means that his testimony about those issues was conjectural layman's opinion; consequently, his opinion testimony should not have had any bearing or relevance on the trial judge's adjudication actions about those complex "ambush complaints" issues.

     As it turned out, the CPA's witness testimony showed that he was not competent to give testimony about those surprise (ambush complaints) complex trust estate issues.  Like most CPA's, he knew almost nothing about the technicalities involved with the complex estate planning "surprise complaint issues" that the plaintiff's attorney raised against defendant co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. for the first time after the trial was in progress. 

     The CPA's testimony repeatedly couched his responses to questions from the plaintiff's attorney about those surprise complaints estate planning issues with "I think so."  In other words, the CPA did not know for sure anything about the surprise complex trust estate issues; he was guessing and his  calculated guessing answers were then used by the plaintiff's attorney to try to fabricate a surprise "ambush" mis-management complaint against defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     The plaintiff's attorney implied that the Amendment document that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  had personally drafted and implemented for his parent's Trust Agreements was not needed at all.  That surprise allegation implied that the Amendment Document was used to provide financial benefits to the two co-trustees (as primary beneficiaries) of their father's trust estate and nothing more than that.  The plaintiff's attorney completely ignored the fact that the amendment document provided the exact estate management features that the father and his wife wanted for their jointly owned estate value. 

     The trial court judge required defendant co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. to give oral testimony about the surprise complaint issues that the judge was allowing into the trial, over the objections of Lon's "defense attorney."  Fortunately, co-trustee Lon, Jr. was still sufficiently knowledgeable about those old estate planning issues to give correct direct answers to all of the questions presented to him by the plaintiff's attorney. 

     Even though co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. had not been given adequate notice to review the technicalities involved with the complex trust administration issues and the federal estate taxation issues that were raised as ambush complaints - he was able to remember important relevant information about each of those issues.  He was able to give competent responsible direct answers to all of the questions posed to him by the plaintiff's attorney (as ambush complaint issues).

     Unfortunately, Lon Jr. did not recall one technical term that he needed to use during his testimony.  (unified credit)   He had not thought about that term for about four years, and it did not come up in his memory when he wanted to use that term.  If he had been noticed properly in the plaintiff's pleading about those additional complaint issues, he would have reviewed those issues before the trial and he would have been able to recall that term and testify about that important special term appropriately.

     When defendant co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. was questioned about some of those issues by his own defense attorney, he was able to explain confidently that the CPA's answers to those surprise complaint questions were not correct.  Defendant co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. testified that the CPA was not a competent witness about those complex trust estate planning issues.  He knew so little about them that he did not understand or appreciate the importance of the Amendment Document.

     Defendant co-trustee Lon Jr. recognized that the CPA's testimony statements and answers were mostly wrong information.  The CPA demonstrated that he did not have a competent understanding of the complex estate planning issues that enabled the federal estate tax savings features provided solely by the Amended Trust Agreement. 

     As a CPA, he should have quickly understood those estate taxation issues, but we must consider the fact that he was actively trying to "help" the plaintiff's attorney's strategy to imply that the Amendment Document had not enabled any federal estate taxation savings - which was totally false. 

     There would not have been any federal estate tax savings without the Amendment Document.  It was absolutely essential to achieve the federal estate tax savings (of about $225,000) for the Willoughby family - according to federal estate taxation rates at the time when Lonnie Willoughby, Sr. died - 11/22/1986

     If co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had been noticed about those surprise issues during discovery actions, he could have commissioned an estate planning attorney expert to come to trial as an expert witness about those complex Trust Estate taxation and estate management issues. 

     The expert would have needed to travel about 75 miles from the very large city that was near to the small town where the circuit court trial was being conducted.  (cost for a trust expert witness - $600 to $1,200 likely - for travel time and one hour of testimony). 

     You can now see the wisdom of not allowing any ambush complaints during a trial.  The surprise complaints scheme greatly interferred with the pleaded purpose of the trial, and the trial court judge fully "cooperated" with that unfair, unethical ambush scheme.


The Final Judgment for the Equity Court Case

That was Heard in the Distant State In September 1989

      When the Final Judgment was subsequently rendered in October 1989 the judge had "chosen" to believe the CPA's shifty incompetent non-expert testimony and to not believe defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's confident knowledgeable testimony about the five surprise complaint issues involving complex federal estate taxation and trust estate management issues. (surprise ambush complaints that were used to develop a false "mismanagement complaint")

     The Final Judgment ruled in defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's favor on the two original complaint issues that were noticed properly in the plaintiff's pleadings (the Complaint), but the judge also ruled against defendant co-trustee Lonnie Jr. on three of the five surprise complaint issues (the ambush "mismanagement complaint").  The unfair and unethical circuit court judge used those improper unfair and unethical fabricated false "ambush complaint issues" to knowingly and willfully cause very competent defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose in the case on the newly alleged "mismanagement complaint" issue. 

     Lon Jr's "defense" attorney's unfair, unethical, and criminal-minded legal malpractice collusively and conspiratorial "cooperated" with the plaintiff's local attorney's surprise "mismanagement complaint" scheme and those actions allowed the plaintiff's attorney to ruthlessly "ambush" defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during trial with five surprise false complaint issues that the "cooperative" judge then used to rule against defendant co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. on the surprise "mismanagement complaint."  That was an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt way to conduct a civil type "equity court" non-jury trial.

     NOTE:  All the "defense attorney" had to do to stop that ambush complaints scheme was to say: 

Your Honor, we object to surprise complaint issues being introduced during this trial.  Those complaint issues were not noticed in the plaintiff's pleadings - so we did not conduct any discovery actions about these new surprise complaint issues. 

It is a clear denial of fundamental due process of law standards to ambush the defendant during trial with complex surprise complaint issues.  It is clear that the plaintiff's surprise complaints scheme has denied the defendant a reasonable amount of time to prepare his defensive arguments about these new surprise "ambush" complaint issues.

     If the "cooperative" trial court judge had unfairly, unethically, and corruptly overruled that detailed responsible objection, co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would have had a very strong argument on appeal to reverse the judge's improper action of allowing testimony about the ambush complaints.

     Think about that situation for a few moments:  a very smart and highly skilled trial attorney with 20+ years of trial court type experience in that state's courts, and as the "defense" attorney for co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., the attorney pretended throughout the one day trial that he did not know how to object properly to surprise complaints being raised against his client for the first time after the trial was in progress.  Absurd!!!  Ridiculous!!!  That was a planned collusive and conspiratorial betrayal of a very responsible co-trustee client - a competent family member co-trustee appointed by his now deceased father to that position and Lon Jr. had served in that capacity very competently for almost seven years.

     During the one-day trial, defendant co-trustee Lon Jr. realized that the two opposing attorneys and the trial court judge were not competent to evaluate the complex surprise complaints issues.  As the trial continued that day, defendant co-trustee Lon Jr. could see clearly that none of the three "officers of the court" had any technical competency with those complex trust estate planning issues. 

     However, the Final Judgment that was rendered weeks later showed that the plaintiff's attorney's "surprise complaints ambush complaints scheme" had worked with the very cooperative "local" trial court judge (a circuit court judge). 

     The unfair, unethical, and corrupt judge used that heinous unfair and unethical ambush complaints scheme to provide him with the appearance of a basis for ruling against defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.   The judge unfairly and unethically ruled against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. on three of the five surprise (ambush) complaint issues to fabricate a false mismanagement complaint against said co-trustee.   The unfair, unethical, and corrupt circuit court judge totally ignored the state Supreme Court's longstanding benchmark controlling (mandatory) prohibition of surprise complaints during a trial proceeding.  No surprise complaints during trial!!!

     The Final Judgment even fraudulently claimed that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was incompetent regarding his knowledge about the Trust Agreement Amendment - claiming that he was an example of a "little knowledge being a dangerous thing."  He was removed as a co-trustee of his deceased father's trust estate - even though he had been selected by his own father and had served faithfully and very responsibly from January 1983 to September 1989 - almost 7 years - with no pay.

     The local CPA who came to trial as a witness for the plaintiff had given perjured testimony about her income for the past two tax years.  He had completed the plaintiff's tax returns for the past several years. and he knowingly and willfully under-reported her income during the trial, in his unethical scheming efforts to show that the plaintiff needed additional income monthly from the trust estate.

     NOTE:  After the trial was over, Lon Jr. talked with the plaintiff and reviewed those two tax returns. Lon Jr. found that the CPA had substantially under-reported the plaintiff's annual income for those two recent years.  The tax returns showed that she did not need additional monthly income from the trust estate.  She was very comfortable in retirement with a good annual income, and she had made tax deductible contributions to various organizations each year totaling about $5,000.00 per year.  That situation proved convincingly that she did not really need additional income from the trust estate.

     The CPA had given perjured testimony about the plaintiff's annual income for two years, and he had give incompetent guessing testimony about the surprise (ambush) complaint issues during trial.  However, the CPA was selected by the trial court circuit court judge to be the successor sole trustee for the Willoughby Trust Estate

     Both of the co-trustee brothers were removed as trustees for their deceased father's trust estate.  The younger brother was an incompetent co-trustee, and he had actually helped the female primary beneficiary develop her unreasonable lawsuit complaints against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     That situation illustrates how extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt the trial court judge was.  During the trial, It became clear to defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. that the judge was extremely biased and prejudiced against him.  Why?  Apparently because Lon Jr. was not an estate planning attorney (or lawyer), but he had managed to learn how to do some remarkable estate planning work that very few attorneys in America know how to accomplish. 

     The judge apparently wanted to severely punish co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. for his non-attorney actions in accomplished the complex estate planning work that had occurred.  Instead of the judge being fair-minded and reasonable and responsibly appreciating what the non-resident son from South Carolina had accomplished for his aging parents in an exceptionally competent and responsible manner, the very biased and bigoted and intolerant narrow-minded trial court judge apparently despised (hated) son Lon Willoughby, Jr. for his very helpful actions for his parents.

     With his extremely bigoted and  prejudiced attitude toward co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr., the judge apparently wanted to believe that the amendment document had not amended the Trust Agreement to enable the two co-trustee to manage the trust estate the way the parent's wanted the estate managed, but rather, the judge apparently wanted to believe that the amendment document had only one purpose - to provide personal financial benefits to the two co-trustees.  The judge showed that he was not capable of understanding that the parents actually wanted the Amended Trust Agreement to work the way it had worked (perfectly) after the death of Mr. Lonnie Willoughby, Sr.  (November 22, 1986

     In his arrogant, pompous, omnipotent "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical self-serving prejudice, the judge totally ignored the fact that both parents had told Lon Jr. exactly what they wanted the trust estate to accomplish, and he had drafted the amendment document to enable the two co-trustees to give the parents exactly what they wanted as trust estate management actions and services.

     Lon Jr. had tried to find an estate planning attorney who could draft a suitable amendment to the Trust Agreements over a period of more than 30 months, when time was very critical because Mr. Lonnie Willoughby, Sr. was in very poor health and subject to die at any time.  Lon Jr. finally decided reluctantly to try to learn how to draft the amendment document himself, and he was successful with that special project - completing it on December 12, 1985. (about 30 months after he concluded that an amendment was needed for the Trust Agreement) 

     If Lon's father had died during that interval of time, it would have been too late to get the amendment document developed and activated.  

     Those very important factors were not considered at all by the trial court judge or the two opposing trial attorneys.  They were so full of arrogant "elitist" aristocratic bigotry and prejudice that they couldn't be rational and reasonable with co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. about anything. 

     The fact that co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr's very competent actions had enabled the trust estate to legally avoid paying about $225,000 in federal estate taxes was totally ignored by the two attorneys and the trial court judge - three arrogant pompous "elitist" aristocratic "officers of the court" who obviously wanted to believe that they were smarter and better than co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (who they knew was not an attorney - not a member of the "elitist" legal brotherhood.

     "They" also conveniently ignored the fact that Lon Willoughby, Jr's very competent estate planning actions had also reduced the probate processing fees to less than $400.00 with no probate attorney fees at all when those probate attorney fees could have typically been $50,000 or more.  (Typical probate attorney fees in that state for a substantial size estate are about 8% of estate value).  The plaintiff's attorney orally acknowledge during the trial that the trust estate had completed the probate process with "no administration" being necessary (no attorney fees involved).

     In the instant situation, co-trustee son Lon Jr. had properly transferred most of Mr. Willoughby's estate value into the trust estate, as his parents wanted him to do, and those estate values totally bypassed the usual probate process - reducing probate attorney fees down to zero dollars.      

     "They" also ignored the fact that the probate court's processing of the final estate settlement request took only 24 hours to get a ruling from the probate judge to complete the probate process.  

     Those very competent situations were apparently what frustrated and irritated the two trial attorneys and the trial court judge so much about co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's estate planning actions.  His competent estate planning actions had prevented any "local" attorney from getting potentially lucrative probate attorney fees.

     Lon Jr's estate planning actions worked exceptionally well, but his "defense" attorney, and the plaintiff's attorney, and the trial court's "circuit court judge" conveniently ignored all of those remarkable estate planning achievements when they all agreed for the Final Judgment to falsely allege that co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. was incompetent regarding those estate planning issues. 

     The three of them formerly "agreed" to label defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. as incompetent in the Final Judgment that the plaintiff's attorney personally drafted for the judge's signature.  Lon Jr's "defense" attorney had an opportunity to object to the wording of the Final Judgment, and move the trial court judge to delete that obviously incorrect verbage, but said attorney apparently agreed to allow that extremely fraudulent very damaging categorization to remain in the Final Judgment - forever damaging severely Lon Jr's reputation with family members and close relatives, and other people who learned about that Final Judgment

     We have explained this situation in some detail to carefully illustrate to all visitors how disgustingly  unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt that criminal-minded "ambush complaints" litigation scheme was - conducted by two highly skilled opposing trial attorneys and a circuit court judge.

     After the trial, It gradually became clear to Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. that those three "officers of the court" wanted to maliciously and ruthlessly harass, persecute, and punish him - apparently for his having gotten personally involved in getting the Trust Agreements drafted and formally implemented for his aging parents, and also because he had subsequently gotten involved personally in the drafting and the formal implementation of the amendment document for his father's Trust Agreement. 

     The three "officers of the court" apparently wanted to believe that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had invaded "their local county legal territory" by personally drafting the amendment document, getting it signed (by his father) and notarized properly, and then filing the original Amended Trust Agreement document in the local circuit court record system - just as a competent estate planning attorney would have needed to do to ensure that the amendment document would be effective in amending the original Trust Agreement for Mr. Lonnie Willoughby, Sr. 

     The error in their thinking processes about those issues was this:  The Willoughby Trust Agreement was not in "their local county legal territory" - it was in the Willoughby family's local county territory.  Co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had authority to take whatever actions were needed to get the Trust Agreement amended to enable the Trust Agreement to be administered in the way that both parents agreed that they wanted the trust estate to be managed currently, and after Mr. Lonnie Willoughby Sr's anticipated pending death (he was in very poor health - subject to die at any time). 

     This situation clearly exposes the arrogant and pompous "elitist" aristocratic autocratic bigoted and prejudiced despotic and tyrannical self-serving attitude of the three "officers of the court" (the two "opposing" attorneys and the "local" circuit court judge). 

    The trial court proceeding 267 pages trial transcript record shows that the three "officers of the court" were incompetent to try to litigate or adjudicate the complex "surprise complaint issues" raised against co-trustee Lonnie Jr. during the trial.  The transcript record shows that they collusively and conspiratorially worked together to knowingly and willfully fabricate an extremely unfair and unethical ambush "mismanagement complaint" against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     "They" had no technical competency to evaluate the five complex estate planning issues that were injected into the trial proceeding as surprise complaint issues against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., but the transcript record shows that they wanted to believe that they were right about those issues by virtue of their arrogant pompus "elitist" aristocratic positions as "officers of the court." 

     "They" wanted to the defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to be ambushed during the trial with those surprise complex trust estate planning issues.  The Final Judgment rendered for the trial on September 8, 1989 proved that they clearly used that unfair and unethical heinous ambush complaints scheme to fraudulently provide an apparent basis for justifying their extremely prejudiced, bigoted, and despotically unfair and corrupt attitude about co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. 

     The three "officers of the court" obviously cared nothing about their professional obligation and sacred duty to provide a fair and impartial judicial forum and fundamental due process of law standards for trial court and defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. They totally ignored their professional sacred duty to honestly and responsibly search for truth in an effort to provide fair and impartial responsible justice for the litigation process. 

     The two volume 267 pages transcript record shows that the three "officers of the court" cared nothing about the legitimate evidential facts presented during the non-jury "equity court" one-day trial.  They were only interested in collusively using their conniving dishonest unethical scheming litigation skills and tactics to ruthlessly ambush non-resident defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

     Like typical unfair, unethical, dishonest criminal-minded "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despots and tyrants, who always "believe" that they are right, they automatically "believed" that defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had to be wrong about any issues that they wanted him to be wrong about. 

     Their arrogant pompous "elitist" self-serving autocratic prejudice against defendant Willoughby was so dominating in their thought processes that the three "officers of the court" were not capable of being fair, and reasonable, and responsible with defendant Willoughby about any of the legitimate issues involved with the one-day non-jury trial.

   The transcript record for that trial shows that "they" were looking for ways to justify their collusive plans to severely punish non-resident co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for helping his parents establish a sophisticated Amended Trust Estate plan that somehow managed to reduce federal estate taxes to zero and also reduced probate processing attorney fees to zero.  They knew that he was not an estate planning attorney; how could he have possibly been correct about those complex estate planning technical issues? 

     The emperor (the legal brotherhood) can do no wrong because he is the "elitist" aristocratic autocratic emperor.   Apparently, that was their arrogant pompous "elitist" aristocratic despotic attitude as they collusively and conspiratorially schemed about developing surprise ambush complaint issues about "mismanagement" against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     It is very important to remember that the plaintiff's discovery affidavit testimony acknowledged  that she had no mismanagement complaint against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  The plaintiff's attorney and the "defense" attorney both participated in that deposition testimony; consequently, they both knew that the plaintiff had testified during the discovery process that she had no mismanagement complaint against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     That was sworn testimony under oath and an official transcript of that testimony could have been made and filed in the official records for the case, but neither of the "opposing" attorneys bothered to have a transcript made and filed in the case records.   During the trial, when the surprise "ambush" complaint about mismanagement was introduced during the trial, neither of the attorneys mentioned that discovery testimony - that contradicted what the plaintiff's attorney was presenting in the trial. 

     It is important to understand that the "defense" attorney could have stopped the plaintiff's attorney's unfair, unethical, and corrupt surprise ambush "mismanagement" complaint scheme by simply objecting to that surprise complaint and explaining to the trial court judge that the plaintiff's deposition testimony during discovery had admitted that she did not have a  mismanagement complaint against defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.

    The "defense" attorney should have had a transcript made of that deposition testimony, and he should have filed the transcript in the official case records.  Then during the trial, when the plaintiff's attorney tried to ambush co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. with that very serious surprise complaint, the "defense" attorney could have simple referred the judge to the transcript record of the plaintiff's deposition testimony (in the records for the case).  An honest and competent "defense" attorney could have easily defeated the plaintiff's attorney's heinous unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt surprise "ambush" "mismanagement complaint" scheme.    

     That very important situation is explained in some detail here to show all visitors how easy it is for "opposing" attorneys to collusively and conspiratorially deliberately corrupt a litigation process - either for the plaintiff or for the defendant (it can go either way they collusively want it to go during the actual trial).  The litigants involved are not going to know anything about those unfair, unethical, and corrupt collusive and conspiratorial litigation schemes and tactics, but they will see some of the results of those unfair, unethical scheming actions as the trial court proceedings progress.  They will not know the full impact of those unfair and unethical litigation actions until the Final Judgement is read.

     The trial court judge was probably informed about the ambush complaints scheme before trial, and the judge has probably agreed to play along with the unfair, unethical, and corrupt ambush scheme.  However, if the judge has not already agreed to play along with their ambush scheme, he will quickly recognize what is going on (he has seen this before - maybe numerous times) and he will casually allow the two "opposing" attorneys to complete their collusive ambush complaints scheme.

     It is important for visitors to understand that the three "officers of the court" took those heinous, reprehensible, unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt judicial actions against very competent defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. even though all three of them were technically incompetent to evaluate the essence of those ambush complex trust estate planning and management issues.

     It is important for visitors to understand that this is the way the human mind typically works for people with a narcissistic "elitist" autocratic superior know-it-all mentality.  They cannot be wrong; it is inconceivable that the emperor can be wrong, and it is heresy for anyone to think so. 

     To them, it was inconceivable that any non-attorney could learn how to accomplish complex estate planning tasks and get it right.  Any non-attorney who thinks he can do that, or thinks that he has done that, must be harassed and persecuted and punished in the most malicious and most ruthless sadistic manner possible within the modern-day judicial system. 

     They could not allow any non-attorney to do any competent estate planning for his aging parents, even though he had made diligent and responsible efforts for about 30 months to get several estate planning attorneys to help him accomplish those very important objectives.

     The information above clearly illustrates how dangerous and treacherous it can be for a non-resident defendant to have to litigate in a distant state's judicial system.  "Local" trial attorneys and a "local" trial court judge typically work together in case after case, and they typically know each other well - may even play golf together or have lunch together at times - their children may be friends. 

     It is very important to understand that they can be as dishonest, as unfair, as unethical, and as criminal-mindedly corrupt as they need to be to develop an apparent "reason" in the litigation records for making the litigation come out the way they mutually agreed to make the Final Judgment come out before trial (the way "they" wanted it to come out to achieve their selfish self-serving objectives).

     We have shown that "they" can be deceitful and unethical in order to manipulate the case to their own "elitist" objectives.  The next paragraph will further confirm that this is how outrageously unfair and corrupt civil or criminal litigation can be (probably in any trial court anywhere in the USA). 

     The initial trial court's circuit court judge (in 1989), and then a series of six successive circuit court trial judges, and also two county court judges, over a period of many years, conducted the ongoing related litigation actions in unfair, unethical, and corrupt "elitist" aristocratic autocratic bigoted and very biased despotic and tyrannical ways to ensure that non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would repeatedly lose in all trial court litigation actions.  He lost even when the documentary evidence, the evidential facts, and the legal standards that were applicable were all strongly in his favor. 

     "They" repeatedly concocted some unfair, unethical, and corrupt litigation scheme or tactic to ensure that non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could not win on any litigation issue - no matter how correct he was, no matter how strong the evidence was in his favor, no matter how strong the controlling legal issues and case law standards were in his favor - no, he must always lose in every legal contest that occurred for 20+ years.

     Those situations occurred several times during a period of 20+ years of ongoing related unfair and unethical self-serving litigation actions for the "legal brotherhood." 

  

Counterclaim Complaints

Jury Trial Denial Schemes 


     The unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial situations reported above were continued as shown below.  Litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had a constitutionally protected right to a jury trial for his Counterclaim Complaints to prosecute his former "defense attorney" and his law firm for very serious legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud complaints.

     Willoughby's Counterclaim Complaints (his pleading) had properly demanded a jury trial (a protected right by that state's Constitution).  However, a successive series of two circuit court judges deceitfully, unethically, and fraudulently denied counterclaim plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. any opportunity to present his complaint actions in a jury trial. 

     Lon Jr. was ruthlessly denied that right by a series of unfair and unethical collusive litigation schemes and tactics initiated by the corrupt "defense attorney" defendant (the FDA) and two successive "very cooperative" unfair and unethical circuit court judges. 

     The "local" attorney defendant (the FDA) and the two successive circuit court judges apparently recognized that non-resident litigant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was capable of presenting his own case pro se (without attorney assistance) in a jury trial, and it was clear to them that Willoughby would almost certainly win his case if a jury trial was allowed to occur (as specifically authorized by the State's Constitution). 

     The series of unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt judicial actions by two successive circuit court judges to prevent that jury trial showed clearly that they were determined to not allow Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. any opportunity to have that jury trial. 

     They realized that Willoughby would likely win a very important legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud case against a very prominent "local" law firm and their trial court attorney (the FDA) - who had more than 20 years of litigation experience in September 1989 when the unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt legal malpractice occurred. 

     The second circuit court judge was assigned to the litigation case because the first circuit court judge assigned to the case was forced to recuse himself by defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's competent and timely Motion for Recusal that demanded that the judge recuse himself from the case (July 1993) - due to his extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions in filing a fraudulent Summary Judgment decision. 

     The judge knowingly and willfully filed that extremely fraudulent judgment in an effort to prevent defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. from having a jury trial in which to prosecute pro se his valid Counterclaim Complaints against his former "defense attorney" (the FDA). (The "defense attorney" that had unfairly, unethically, and corruptly betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during the equity court bench trial conducted in September 1989).

     The extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt "defense attorney" had filed a motion for "Summary Judgement" in the case in an effort to get defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's counterclaim pleading against the attorney and his law firm dismissed - on the basis that the statute of limitations had expired before the Counterclaim Complaint was filed.   

     NOTE:  A motion for Summary Judgement attempts to show that there is no valid reason for that claim to be allowed to go forward and be adjudicated in a trial procedure.  The filer of said motion attempts to show that there is some valid reason for the judge to dismiss a pleading claim or pleading counterclaim due to a serious defect in the pleadings.  The motion proposes that a specific portion of the litigation complaint can be dismissed in said motion hearing with a direct ruling on that issue(s) by the judge.

     Lon Jr. traveled the 500 miles to the distant state's judicial chamber's Summary Judgment hearing, and he was well prepared to present his argument issues that showed that the statute of limitations had not expired prior to his filing the counterclaim action.

     During the Summary Judgment hearing, defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. presented photocopies to the circuit court judge of three relevant on-point appellate court decisions (in that state) showing that the statute of limitations had not run out because defendant Lonnie Willoughby's first appeal (in 1989) had been in progress for quite a while before the appeal decision had been finalized.  That related appeal situation prevented the statute of limitation time period from beginning to run until that appeal was finalized.       

     The plaintiff's attorney and the trial court judge both knew about that situation of course, but if counterclaim plaintiff Lon Jr. did not properly defend himself on that issue during the Summary Judgment hearing, the plaintiff would automatically win their improper claim when the trial court judge dismissed Lon Jr's counterclaim pleadings. 

     They were both obligated to acknowledge that delaying situation by the ethical standards of the state Bar Association, but they both demonstrated that they paid no attention at all to those very important ethical standards.

      NOTE:  That first appeal was about the unfair, unethical, and corrupt Final Judgment that was rendered in October 1989 about the September 8, 1989 non-jury one-day "equity court" bench trial where defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was ruthlessly "ambushed" during trial in an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt manner with the five false surprise complaint issues that were improperly used to develop a surprise "mismanagement" complaint against Lon Jr. after the non-jury trial was in progress. 

      Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. lost that first appeal case due to the betrayal actions of his very competent and capable "appeal attorney's" collusive and conspiratorial actions of knowingly and willfully "cooperating" with the appellee's attorney to deliberately cause Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose his appeal case. 

     This was a second situation that showed how attorneys will collusively and conspiratorially work together to cause a fraudulent litigation process.  In this second situation, Appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's appeal attorney and the appellee's attorney collusively and conspiratorially worked together to help the two "opposing" trial court attorneys and the trial court's circuit court judge avoid being exposed in Willoughby's appeal as extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt "officers of the court."

     The 267 pages two volume transcript record (in the Record on Appeal) clearly proved (conclusively) that the three "officers of the court" had been extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt during the one-day non-jury "equity court" trial on September 8, 1989. But appellant Willoughby's appeal attorney did not report those conditions in his appeal brief. 

     Lon's appeal attorney also failed to identify the state's Supreme Court's benchmark case law decision and controlling (mandatory) prohibition of surprise complaints being introduced during a trial proceeding.  No surprise complaints allowed, but Lon's appeal attorney pretended that he did not know about that longstanding benchmark case law decision (and he did not find that very important case law reference when he was conducting research for case law decisions that would help win Lon's appeal case). That one case law decision was all that was needed for appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to have a solid basis for winning his appeal. 

     Visitors can now see clearly and understand clearly how easy it is for a trusted attorney to betray their client's litigation interests.


Back to the Summary Judgment Action

     After that Summary Judgment motion hearing in June 1993, Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. traveled the 500 miles back to his home in South Carolina knowing that he had solidly defeated the plaintiff law firm's Motion for Summary Judgment

     However, when he subsequently received the circuit court judge's ruling on that matter by mail, the circuit court judge had approved the motion for Summary Judgment and had thereby dismissed plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's Counterclaim Complaints against the local law firm and their "attorney."  (the FDA

     The circuit court judge had unfairly, unethically, and corruptly ignored the controlling three appellate court case law decisions that had shown conclusively that the statute of limitation had been delayed in running due to the related appeal case explained above.  That was a very important fraudulent judicial decision because Lon Jr's counterclaim was seeking a jury award of $600,000 or more ($600,000 in damages plus punitive damages - could have been more than one million dollars total award).

     It is important for American adult visitors to understand that the unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt Summary Judgment judicial decision was drafted by the plaintiff law firm's attorney - the FDA - the same unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt "defense attorney" who had deceitfully and collusively allowed the plaintiff's attorney to ambush co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. during trial on September 8, 1989 with five false surprise "ambush" complaint issues that were then used to fabricate an extremely fraudulent ambush "mismanagement complaint" against non-resident defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     Visitors need to understand that it is the normal and usual procedure in that state for the winning attorney (winning the Summary Judgement issue) to draft the judicial order for the trial judge's signature.  The winning attorney can usually draft the document the way they want it worded; the "cooperative" judge will likely go along with their wording if it is somewhat "reasonable."

     The very important significance here is to show that both the attorney and the circuit court judge had unfairly, unethically, and corruptly ignored the three appellate court case decisions that defendant Lon Jr. had presented to the judge (photocopies) showing that in these circumstances, where a related appeal case is in progress for a period of time, the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the appeal case had been completed. 

     Defendant Lon Jr. only needed to present one of those relevant appeal court case law decisions to competently defend himself in that Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing, but he had presented three relevant appeal court case law decisions (from appeal courts in that state), and each of those controlling appellate court case law decisions solidly showed that Willoughby's Counterclaim Complaint filing time was timely.

     The counterclaim pleadings presented a very important case about legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud against the instant plaintiff law firm and it's attorney (the FDA).  The counterclaim pleadings asked for a jury award of $600,000 in damages to Counterclaim Plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (plus punitive damages - an unspecified amount).

     The plaintiff law firm's attorney and the circuit court judge had no valid authority to disregard the controlling appeal case law decisions that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. presented during the Summary Judgment hearing.  Both of them were ethically duty bound to comply with those controlling appellate court case law on-point decisions. 

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. has shown that "they" fraudulently ignored those controlling case law decisions. Those were criminal actions by the plaintiff's attorney and the trial court judge, pursuant to a state criminal-law statute that Lon Willoughby, Jr. discovered some months later.  He was confident that the attorney and the judge knew that they were violating that criminal law statute with their deceitful and fraudulent actions to ignore the controlling appellate court case law decisions that Lon Jr. had presented that day. 

     Non-resident counterclaim plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., from South Carolina, was forced to file another appeal case that would be very time consuming and expensive and a lot of trouble for him.  He did not have convenient access to a law library in that state to conduct his legal research about the appeal issues. 

     That Summary Judgment situation illustrates how disgustingly dishonest and unethical trial attorneys and circuit court judges can be - forcing a non-resident pro se litigant into a complex, difficult, and expensive appeal situation that was unnecessary if the circuit court judge had been ethical and responsibly honest about that situation. 

     The circuit court judge knew that defendant Lon Jr. has won the Summary Judgement hearing contest, but he and the plaintiff's attorney (the FDA) both participated in collusively issuing an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial order that officially claimed that the plaintiff law firm had won the Summary Judgment contest that they had requested about defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's Counterclaim Complaints

     That circuit court judge had previously been a state prosecutor for many years.  This situation shows that state prosecutors and state circuit court judges will lie about anything and knowingly and willfully falsify official litigation records to make a litigation action come out the way they want it to come out - using their arrogant pompous "elitist" aristocratic self-serving corrupt despotic and tyrannical actions.

     Lon Jr. had to do a lot of study and legal work to file a timely motion that demanded that the extremely unfair, unethical, and outrageously corrupt circuit court judge recuse himself from the case (voluntarily withdraw from any further proceedings in the case) - based upon a state statutory law that was written for such corrupt judicial actions.

     In addition to that recusal action, defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. also had to timely file his Notice of Appeal and pay the filing fees involved for the local circuit court and also the appellate court (several hundred dollars) and then begin the complex process of selecting the "Record on Appeal" documents that would be compiled by the clerk of court's office (at a cost of several hundred dollars).  Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. then had to begin developing his appeal's "Initial Brief." 

     All of those work actions were confusing and time consuming for Lon Willoughby, Jr.  because he had no education about those subjects (no law school education), and he had no experience with preparing and filing the litigation documents that were involved. Remember that he had hired a competent appeal attorney for his previous appeal. 

     Another very important factor was the fact that non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., living in South Carolina, did not have convenient access to a law library in that distant state. He needed to have access to a law library that would contain all of the special legal reference books that were applicable for that particular state.  The law library in Greenville, SC did not contain those specialty law books for the distant state. 

     That situation caused defendant Willoughby to purchase twenty legal books (from the publisher) about a broad variety of legal subjects for that state's litigation case law studies - at a cost of about $50.00 per book (20 books at $50.00 each = $1,000.00).  He had to conduct a lot of legal research about the publisher and those books just to determine which books he should purchase. 

     Those very important legal reference books would enable Lon Willoughby to conduct legal research about some very important relevant legal issues that might help him compile and draft a much better Initial Brief for his appeal case (improving his potential to win his appeal case).  Lon realized that he would probably need those special legal reference books to conduct additional legal research for other litigation actions that he anticipated would likely occur for the case.

     The unfair, unethical, and fraudulent actions of that circuit court judge and the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA) had quickly forced defendant Willoughby into a very complex and very difficult litigation situation that he had no education, training, or experience in coping with.  Drats!!!  What a corrupt mess the case was turning out to be.  He had encountered another extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt circuit court judge. 

     Are all of the distant state's trial court judges corrupt?  Read on and see what happens in the ongoing litigation case with the new successor circuit court judge. 

    +  +  +  +

         As stated previously, the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA) and the circuit court judge had both collusively and conspiratorially violated a very serious criminal law statutory law when they collusively falsified an official order - the extremely corrupt and fraudulent Summary Judgment Order that had improperly (corruptly) dismissed defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's Counterclaim Complaint - seeking a $600,000 damage award. 

     A transcript record for the Summary Judgment motion hearing in June 1993 could be a very important part of the Record on Appeal for appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr's appeal, and the official transcript record could prove conclusively that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had given the circuit court judge photocopies of the three controlling appellate court case law decisions that had proven conclusively, beyond any doubt whatsoever, that the Statute of Limitations had not expired before defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. filed his Counterclaim Complaint

      However, non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby had to communicate by telephone with the court reporter in the distant state that he had hired to attend that Summary Judgment motion hearing and transcribe the entire proceeding.  He commissioned her to prepare a complete written transcript record of that motion hearing and paid for the transcript record with his credit card.  He asked her to file the original transcript in the circuit court case file, and Lon Jr. subsequently received a copy of the transcript by USPS Priority Mail.  That transcript record would become a very important part of the Record on Appeal for his upcoming appeal.  Cost for that transcript - several hundred dollars.

     During the subsequent appeal, it was therefore clear that the appellate court judges had the transcript evidence which proved conclusively, beyond any doubt, that the circuit court judge and the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA) had knowingly and willfully violated relevant criminal statutory law that prohibited unfair, unethical, corrupt, and fraudulent judicial actions.

     Appellant Willoughby's Initial Brief called the court's attention to those corrupt and fraudulent judicial action.  Consequently, it is clear that the three appellate court judges  knew that the trial court judge and the plaintiff's attorney had violated relevant criminal law statutes (which required investigation, prosecution, and prison time for both of them - and probably a loss of license to practice law in that state for each of them). 

     However, the appellate court judges did not take any actions to help initiate a criminal law investigation and prosecution of those criminal actions.  They just ignored those very serious criminal actions by a circuit court judge and an attorney and their collusive and conspiratorial actions to file an extremely unfair, unethical Summary Judgment order.

     NOTE:  Each state within the USA has its own state criminal law statutes, and alleged violations of one or more of those state statutes can be investigated and then prosecuted by state law enforcement personnel ("state attorneys" or "state solicitors") and/or the state's attorney general and their staff law enforcement personnel (attorneys/lawyers). 

     All of those state law investigative and law enforcement officers usually operate separately and independently from federal criminal law enforcement actions, but there are some situations where federal statutory criminal law violations may also be involved.  In those situations, the state and federal investigative personnel may work together somewhat "cooperatively." 

     NOTE:  Some states have a special criminal law investigative department that is somewhat similar to having a state level type FBI - they work closely with the state's attorney general for prosecution of alleged state level criminal statutory law violations.

     It is very important for visitors to learn that nothing was done later to investigate and punish the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt circuit court judge and the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt plaintiff's attorney (the FDA) for their collusive and conspiratorial criminal-minded unfair, unethical, and fraudulent Summary Judgment decision - that forced non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. into a situation where he would have to timely file for and then present an appeal case to try to overcome their corrupt actions. 

     Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. would have three viable choices: 

     1.  Don't bother with presenting an appeal and forever lose his rights to prosecute his very important Counterclaim Complaint (jury trial seeking a $600,000 damage award).

     2.  He could hire an appeal attorney to present an appeal case for him - at a cost of several thousand dollars - and again be subject to a betrayal action by that attorney like he had been deceitfully betrayed by his first appeal attorney in year 1990 (causing him to lose a very important appeal case). 

     3.  He could attempt to do all of the appeal litigation work himself, with no education or experience in conducting those litigation services.  Lon realized that it would likely be a difficult and time consuming litigation task (especially for a pro se litigant) but it would enable him to avoid another situation where he could be easily betrayed by his attorney.

     You see, that is how the disgustingly corrupt selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical judicial system works.  Attorneys/lawyers and "cooperative" trial court judges can deliberately cause unfair, unethical, and corrupt despotic judicial actions that severely persecute and punish a "litigant victim" in a ruthless and malicious manner.  They can sadistically cause him or her a lot of expense and work to file and prosecute a complex appeal case to try to overcome their actions. 

     It is very important to understand that nothing at all will be done to those extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt "officers of the court" who cause these types of situations - absolutely no investigations of their very serious criminal actions, and thus - no penalties or punishment of any kind!!! 

     Defendant Willoughby learned that this is the usual situation even when "officers of the court" clearly violated state criminal law statues or clearly violated federal criminal law statutes - such as federal mail fraud actions and/or federal wire fraud actions. 

     "They" know that they can be as unfair, unethical, and as corrupt in a litigation process as "they" want to be for their selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical purposes

     Lon Jr. learned that they are confident that if their criminal actions get reported by an honest, responsible, and courageous law-abiding opponent, nothing at all will be done to "them" in the form of investigation and penalty or punishment.  Remember that the circuit court judge and the FDA are members of the "elitist" aristocratic legal brotherhood.

     Lon Jr. found that the distant state had extremely unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt judicial systems, and visitors can learn herein about some of that appalling and disgusting corruption and also learn why that corruption is routinely allowed to exist. 

     The extremely arrogant and pompous selfish self-serving "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical judicial systems routinely allow and effectively encourage attorneys and judges to be dishonest, unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt.  That sounds like it could not happen in American courts - right?  Read on.

     They are allowed to routinely make a terrible mess out of some litigation actions as a form of sadistic amusement and pleasure, realizing that those kinds of litigation and judicial actions bring a lot more money into the legal profession (the legal brotherhood).


The Pattern Of Actions That

Have Occurred In The Case 

     1.  In June 1993, the circuit court judge (a former state prosecutor) and the "local" plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA) worked together collusively and conspiratorially to knowingly and willfully create an unfair, unethical, and corrupt Summary Judgment order that improperly (corruptly and fraudulently) dismissed defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's Counterclaim Complaint about legal malpractice, deceit, and fraud

     That order claimed that the Statute of Limitations (three years time limit for filing said Counterclaim Complaint) had expired before defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had filed his Counterclaim Complaint against the plaintiff law firm and its attorney (the FDA).

     2.  That extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt official judicial order forced non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. into a very bad situation where he would need to file and appeal.  If he chose to appeal the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt Summary Judgment decision, he could hire one of their "legal brotherhood" attorneys to represent him on appeal. (likely cost for an appeal = several thousand dollars)

     If defendant Willoughby chose to hire an attorney to represent him on appeal, that would give the plaintiff law firm and its attorney (the FDA) opportunities to collusively and conspiratorially work with Lon's attorney to find a way to cause appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose in his appeal case.

     That is what occurred with Lon Willoughby, Jr's first appeal in 1990 - his appeal attorney collusively and conspiratorially "cooperated" with the appellee's attorney to cause appellant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to lose his appeal case. 

     That extremely corrupt deceitful betrayal action in 1990 prevented appeal exposure of two "opposing" trial attorneys and a circuit court judge that had conducting the trial court litigation in an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt manner that maliciously and ruthlessly "ambushed" co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during the trial, denying him fundamental due process of law for the one-day non-jury "equity court" trial. 

     It is very important to understand that those extremely unethical and corrupt trial court actions, by three "officers of the court" were in direct conflict with the state's Supreme Court's controlling (mandatory) longstanding benchmark case law decision that clearly prohibited allowing surprise complaint issues during a trial proceeding.

     If the plaintiff law firm and its FDA (the appellee in said appeal) could get appellant Lon Willoughby's appeal attorney to "cooperate" with the appellee's desired outcome for said appeal (appellant Lon Willoughby would lose his appeal), the plaintiff law firm and its very prominent attorney (the FDA) would ultimately win in their unethical and corrupt self-serving objective to keep defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's Counterclaim Complaint dismissed (by hook or crook - whatever scheme was necessary to attain that goal). 

     3.  If defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. chose to not appeal the corrupt (fraudulent) Summary Judgment decision, the plaintiff law firm and its attorney (the FDA) would automatically win - leaving defendant Willoughby's Counterclaim Complaint dismissed.

     4.  At that point in time, non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. understood how unfair, unethical, and corrupt the judicial system was in an extremely self-serving manner.  He also understood how corrupt the "legal brotherhood" could be in any litigation action, so he decided to conduct his own appeal case pro se (with no attorney help) even though he did not know how to do that. 

     He knew that he had learned some important relevant information about the appeal process from his first appeal case (1990), where his hired appeal attorney had prepared and filed the Initial Brief which had deceitfully betrayed Lon Jr.

     5.  Using the state's Rules of Procedure book, defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. learned how to file his Notice of Appeal and got it filed timely, and he paid the filing fee to the circuit court for that action.  He also paid the appeal filing fee for the appellate court. 

     He also paid for the preparation of the transcript record of the Summary Judgment proceeding and got it filed in the circuit court record for said case.  He began learning how to select an appropriate Record on Appeal and then paid the clerk of court's fee for the work done by the deputy clerk in preparing the official Record on Appeal and shipping the record to the appellate court (about sixty miles away from the trial court location).  

     Important Note:  Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. did eventually win that appeal case in the Appellate Court in the distant state.  Remember that the appeal case was about the circuit court judge's grossly unfair and unethical judicial action to blatantly ignore the three appellate court case law decisions that clearly showed, beyond any doubt, that the statute of limitations had not expired when defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. filed his Counterclaim Complaints (his pleadings) against the plaintiff law firm and it's attorney (the FDA).  However, winning that appeal did not occur until many months later.

     We will now report several unfair, unethical, and fraudulent judicial actions that occurred in the meantime - while appellant Lonnie  Willoughby, Jr. was waiting for that very important appeal decision to be rendered (filed by the appellate court) and re-establishing the Counterclaim Complaint and transferring the case back to the trial court (circuit court) for further adjudication.  The following information will provide more information and evidence about how the judicial systems actually work.


The Successor Circuit Court Judge

     A successor circuit court judge had been appointed to continue the circuit court litigation process after defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had filed his Motion to Recuse the presiding circuit court judge.  The judge did promptly recuse himself from the case.

     The same state statutory law that enabled a seriously abused litigant to file a Motion for Recusal of an unfair, unethical, and corrupt judge also enabled that litigant to file motions with the successor judge to review and rehear relevant orders that had been issued by the now recused judge that were unfairly harmful to the abused litigant. 

     Consequently, defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. filed five motions that requested the successor circuit court judge to review and then suspend five orders that had been issued by the now recused unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt circuit court judge.  Those five orders were improperly and unfairly harmful to defendant Lon Willoughby.

     The successor circuit court judge summarily denied (instantly, without due process) all of defendant Willoughby's five motions for review of those five orders (one motion for each order).  The judge indicated vaguely in his responsive order that he could not review those orders.  His actions in that regard had obviously ignored the statutory law that each of defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's five motions had clearly cited, showing that a successor judge was granted special authority to review disputed orders that had been issued by a subsequently recused judge.

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. then filed a Motion for Rehearing of the successor judge's refusal to review and recend the five orders involved as requested in defendant Willoughby's previous five Motions for Review.  These five motions presented more detailed information about the statutory law that clearly authorized the successor circuit court judge to review any disputed orders issued by the now recused circuit court judge. 

     The successor circuit court judge again summarily denied those five Motions for Rehearing.  Unfortunately, that was the end of that litigation action unless defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. filed an appeal about the judge's unfair and improper motion decisions. 

     Lon was already working 100+ hours per week with his current appeal work and his federal civil case work, and he was also trying to keep his complex health and wellness store business in operation.  Consequently, Lon Willoughby had no time available to get involved with trying to file and then prosecute another complex and expensive appeal case - about the unfair and unethical order that denied review of those five orders.

     Lon simply had to tolerate the successor circuit court judge's unfair and unethical actions that totally ignored the controlling statutory law involved.  This is another illustration of the arrogant pompous narcissistic "elitist" aristocratic autocratic despotic and tyrannical mental attitude of the successor circuit court judge.  He was not going to review and reverse any of the recused judge's orders, no matter how unfair, unethical, or  harmful they may have been to defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     Each of defendant Willoughby's motions had explained what was wrong with each order involved, but the "elitist" autocratic successor judge apparently ignored all of Lon's  conscientious and responsible legal work in presenting each one of those five motions.

    Lon Jr. was very busy with his federal court case at that time, and he had also begun his appeal Initial Brief work about the unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions of the first appointed circuit court judge (now recused from the case).

     All of that complex and detailed motion activity with the successor circuit court judge was an impediment to defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., especially so with his very busy work schedule with various litigation actions.  He was also trying to work with his complex health and wellness store operation - work that he needed to accomplish daily. 

     Consequently, he was working more than 100 hours per week, sleeping only 3 to 6 hours per night, and taking time to eat something only twice per day, shaving and bathing about every third or fourth day.  Yes, Lon was really that busy for weeks at a time, due to those extremely unfair, unethical, and disgustingly corrupt judicial actions.  Those very heavy workload situations occurred many times during the 20+ years ordeal.


Review:  Lawsuit To Collect Attorney Fees

The FDA (former defense attorney) law firm had previously sued non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. because he had refused to pay the law-firm about $3,300 in additional billed attorney fees for their extremely deceitful and fraudulent representation of co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. in the civil case that went to trial in September 1989

     That was the civil case where the FDA knowingly and willfully betrayed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. by allowing the plaintiff's attorney to introduce five "ambush complaints" against said co-trustee after the one-day non-jury "bench trial" was in progress (as explained previously herein in some detail). 


Successor Circuit Court Judge

Conducts Motion Hearing

     Several months later, the successor circuit court judge conducted two motion hearings in one day (December 12, 1993) that involved non-resident defendant Lonnie  Willoughby, Jr.  The plaintiff law firm had scheduled nine motions to be heard on that day, and defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had scheduled seven motions to be heard on the same day (because he had to travel 500 miles to attend a motion hearing).  Remember that non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. lived in South Carolina, and he had to drive his car to the distant southern state to participate in a motion hearing.

     There were 16 motions to be heard that day so each party had a lot of subjects to prepare for argument issues - to either present an oral argument supporting a motion or conversely, present oral argument that would oppose a motion by the opposing party.

     The plaintiff's motion hearing began at 9:00 A.M. before the successor circuit court judge.  He was openly hostile toward defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr.; it was clear that the judge was not going to provide a fair and impartial motion hearing for Willoughby.

     The judge allowed the local law firm plaintiff to orally present each of their nine motions sequentially in the morning motion hearing.  Defendant Willoughby competently presented his oral argument issues, defending himself pro se against the plaintiff's nine motions.  The morning motion hearing lasted about three hours - until lunch time.

     After the lunch break, the judge opened the afternoon motion hearing session for defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. to begin presenting his first motion pro se.  The judge had been obviously biased and hostile toward defendant Lon Jr. throughout the plaintiff's  motion hearing, and his attitude and demeanor was the same at the beginning of the afternoon motion hearing.  The judge clearly tried to frustrate and intimidate defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. at the beginning of his scheduled motion hearing.

     Defendant Willoughby had anticipated those unfair and improper judicial actions, and he had thought about that potential situation while he was eating lunch at a nearby restaurant.  Throughout the morning motion hearing, defendant Lon Willoughby had been calm, cool, and collected - which is his usual emotional demeanor in all situations. 

     He had completed the U.S. Air Force's Academic Instructor Training program in 1956, at age 20, graduating near the top of that class, and he had many months of experience teaching classes in a military classroom setting.  Lon Willoughby, Jr. had also completed a Dale Carnegie Course in 1977, graduating at the top of that class.  He had been elected as class president at the end of the course by the graduates of that education program.  

     Lon Willoughby had also been in several leadership and supervisory positions in the U.S. Air Force and later in his 19 years of service with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  His last assignment with the FAA was as a Proficiency and Development Officer at the FAA's Sector Field Office located at the Greenville/Spartanburg Airport

    At the beginning of that assignment, Willoughby had completed the FAA's Supervisors Training Program at the University in Lawton, Oklahoma, graduating at the top of the class because he was an accomplished public speaker and teacher. 

     All of that special education and experience enabled Lon Willoughby to have very good emotional control and to always remain calm, cool, and collected in all circumstances. He understood that this was clearly the best way to act and perform to achieve the best outcome when communicating with and working with other people. 

     During the beginning of the afternoon motion hearing, defendant Lon Willoughby  diplomatically avoided allowing the obviously very biased and unfair circuit court judge to frustrate or intimidate him in any way.  Lon Jr. calmly began presenting his first motion. 

     The judge listened to defendant Willoughby's first oral motion presentation for a few moments and then arrogantly and sarcastically interrupted him and stated strongly: "Mr. Willoughby, you did not tell me what you want me to do about this motion!" 

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. then calmly replied:  "Your Honor, page 4 of my motion explains what I want you to do about this motion."  

     The judge quickly realized that he could not frustrate or intimidate or upset non-resident defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr., as the judge obviously attempted to do, and he  then quickly terminated the motion hearing - without allowing defendant Willoughby to present his prepared oral arguments that would support the judge's approval of his remaining six motions that had been scheduled for hearing before the judge.  

     The successor circuit court judge gave no explanation about why he was not allowing defendant Willoughby to continue presenting oral argument for the rest of his motions.

     Defendant Willoughby had spent many hours preparing his seven written motions and their respective argument issues.  He was prepared to present all of those motion oral argument issues to the judge.  He had driven 500 miles (10 hours of travel time) to participate in that very important and very complex motion hearing (with 16 motions scheduled for oral argument - Wow!!! - what a complex ordeal to contend with. 

     Defendant Willoughby was perplexed as to what the successor judge was doing and why he was doing it.  He appeared to be an extremely unfair, unethical, biased judge who had an openly hostile "elitist" aristocratic autocratic and despotic mentality

     The judge clearly had a duty to be a competent responsible circuit court judge and provide a fair and impartial judicial forum for hearing all of the motions scheduled for oral argument on that day.  He had clearly failed to provide a competent responsible judicial forum for accomplishment of those duties for defendant Lon Willoughby's motions.

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. realized that the successor circuit court judge was probably retaliating against him - maliciously and ruthlessly punishing him severely  because defendant Willoughby had properly filed a Motion for Recusal of the previous circuit court judge. 

     That motion had properly and responsibly reported that the (previous) circuit court judge had been extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt.  He had knowingly and willfully rendered an obviously corrupt and fraudulent Summary Judgment decision/  Willoughby's motion had shown convincingly and conclusively that it was appropriate for defendant Willoughby to present his Motion for Recusal.

     Defendant Willoughby had taken that special motion action competently and responsibly, pursuant to the state statutory law that had been written and approved by the state's legislature to protect litigants from an unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial situation.  The statutory law was probably based on past occurrences of judicial corruption, and it provided an authorized procedure to follow in judicial corruption situations occurred in the future. 

     That was the type of extremely unfair and unethical judicial corruption that defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had experienced with the previous circuit court judge with his clearly corrupt and fraudulent Summary Judgment decision - that had improperly dismissed defendant Lon Willoughby's Counterclaim Complaints (against the plaintiff law firm and its attorney - the FDA). 

     Defendant Willoughby's Motion to Recuse the first circuit court judge had exposed and reported in detail how the first circuit court judge and the plaintiff law firm's attorney (the FDA) had collusively and conspiratorially worked together to render an extremely corrupt and fraudulent Summary Judgment.  They had also colluded together to execute five other orders that were improperly beneficial to the plaintiff law firm and its attorney (the FDA) while being unfair and improperly harmful to defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

    The successor circuit court judge obviously did not appreciate defendant Willoughby's responsible pro se litigation competency with his honest and courageous actions to remove an extremely unfair, unethical, corrupt circuit court judge from the case, even when it was clear that defendant Willoughby's pro se litigation actions were authorized by relevant state statutory law - for such unfair, unethical, corrupt judicial situations. 

     Defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. realized that the successor circuit court judge was apparently retaliating against him and ruthlessly punishing him by preventing him from presenting his motion arguments in his protected pro se capacity.  It appeared that the successor circuit court judge was ruthlessly punishing defendant Willoughby, for having taken responsible actions to remove a very corrupt circuit court judge from the case. 

     It appeared that the successor circuit court judge was knowingly and willfully destroying defendant Willoughby's constitutionally protected right to present his motions (and his Counterclaim Complaints) in his pro se capacity

     Fortunately, defendant Lon Jr. had hired a court reporter to be present for both motion hearings that day and transcribe all of the proceedings.  That situation would make it possible for him to purchase a written transcript record of both motion hearings. 

     He then had to drive the 500 miles to get back to his home in Mauldin, South Carolina (near Greenville, SC.) realizing that he would likely need to file another complex and expensive appeal case to try to defend himself from the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions that had ruthlessly denied him his constitutionally protected right to present his motion arguments pro se

     A few days later, Lon Jr. received an order in the mail from the judge.  The order contained several statements about defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. and his pro se performance in the circuit court case.  Those statements were bald-face lies - deliberate false statements about defendant Lon Willoughby and his pro se actions in the litigation process conducted before this extremely biased "elitist" corrupt circuit court judge

    Thank goodness, defendant Lon Willoughby would be able to purchase a written transcript record for the two motion hearings conducted on December 12, 1993 (this would be an expensive transcript - several hundred dollars - for more than three hours of court reporter transcription of those oral activities).

     All of the unfair, unethical, and fraudulent false statements in the court's order about defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr. were an obvious attempt to ruthlessly malign his pro se litigation actions and tar brush him badly in said order.       

     The order also stated that defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. could not file any more "pleadings" in the circuit court case unless the pleadings were signed by an attorney (licensed to practice law in that state).  

     Defendant Willoughby understood that the judge's malicious and ruthless false statements in that injunctive order would hurt him badly when he appealed the judge's retaliatory action of denying him his constitutionally protected right to continue litigating pro se (without assistance of an attorney).   

     The judge was apparently well aware of the Summary Judgment dismissal of defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's Counterclaim Complaints against the local plaintiff law firm and its attorney (the FDA). 

     The improper (extremely corrupt) dismissal of those Counterclaim Complaints was now on appeal - by defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's pro se actions.  Until the appeal was completed, and hopefully reversed, defendant Lon Willoughby, Jr's Counterclaim Complaints would remain dismissed in this ongoing circuit court litigation process. 

     Remember that defendant Willoughby's Counterclaim Complaints were what moved the case from the county court's jurisdiction into the circuit court's jurisdiction.  Without an active Counterclaim Complaint, the case could now be transferred back to the county court's jurisdiction.  However, defendant Willoughby realized that the case should remain in the circuit court's jurisdiction and all further proceeding should be suspended until the ongoing appeal process had been completed. 

     It was very clear that there was no reasonable way to prosecute the plaintiff's complaints against defendant Willoughby without also considering the directly related issues presented in defendant Lon Willoughby's Counterclaim Complaints.

     The litigation process would be much more complicated and cumbersome for non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., if the circuit court judge transferred the case back to the county court before Lon's Summary Judgment appeal was completed.

     If appellant Lon Willoughby won that appeal, as he fully expected to do, anything that was done in the litigation process down in the county court before that time would then have to be reconsidered and re-litigated when the Counterclaim Complaints were re-instated by that appeal case win.  So guess what happened next in the litigation process?


Transfer Of The Circuit Court Litigation

Back To The County Court


Summary Review of Prior 1989

Circuit Court's Bench Trial Litigation

     The successor circuit court judge also transferred the circuit court case back down to the county court's jurisdiction for further adjudication of the law firm's lawsuit against Lon Willoughby, Jr. for the attorney fees that he had refused to pay (for good reasons). 

     Remember that most of the argument issues about why Lon Willoughby refused to pay those additional attorney fees, that had been billed to Lon Willoughby after the trial was completed on September 8, 1989, were contained in the Counterclaim Complaints that had been improperly (corruptly) dismissed by the first circuit court judge.  It was therefore clear that we needed to wait for an appeal decision to be reached before continuing with the litigation of the complex civil case.

     Relevant Notes:  The plaintiff law firm's lawsuit against defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was initially filed in the County Court to attempt to recover about $3300 in legal fees billed to Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.  However, he had refused to pay those fees because the FDA had failed to represent co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. in a competent and responsible manner - regarding the five surprise "ambush" complaints raised against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. after the non-jury "equity court" one-day trial was in progress.   

     The trial transcript record (September 8, 1989) accurately reported each of those "defense" attorney objections.  The transcript showed that he had repeatedly failed to make proper objections to those complex ambush complaint issues.  He made four objections to the multiple surprise complaint issues, but none of his objections showed that Co-trustee Lonnie  Willoughby, Jr. would be prejudiced (damaged/injured) if those complaints were allowed into the trial and then adjudicated by the judge.

     The Final Judgment for that case showed that Co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. lost the case against him because the trial judge did adjudicate those ambush complaints, and he ruled against co-trustee Lon Willoughby, Jr. on three of the five ambush complaint issues that were used to fabricate a false "mismanagement complaint" against him. 

     Lon Jr. has shown herein previously that those adjudications were improper, based upon the improper and inaccurate testimony by the CPA witness, who was not admitted as an expert witness.  Consequently, none of his layman's testimony should have been considered by the judge as a basis for adjudicating estate planning issues. 

     If the plaintiff's attorney wanted to claim that co-trustee Lon Willoughby's estate planning amendment actions had been improper in some way, they needed to bring in testimony by an expert trust estate attorney.  Anything short of that was inadequate.

     Defendant co-trustee Lon Jr's testimony had shown convincingly that the CPA was incompetent to present testimony about the surprise (ambush) complaint issues, but those critically important legal considerations were of no concern to this corrupt judge - who obviously cared nothing about fair and impartial due process of law considerations.


State Supreme Court's Long-standing

Controlling Case Law Decision

     Lon Jr. has also shown herein that the state's Supreme Court had previously ordered, several years prior to the trial on September 8, 1989, that no surprise complaints could be allowed in a trial unless both parties agreed to litigate each surprise complaint issue.

     The trial judge and the two "opposing" attorneys surely knew about that exceptionally important landmark controlling case law decision.  Furthermore, as members of the legal profession in that state, they were obligated to understand and comply with the state Bar Association's ethics standards. 

     Those ethics require all attorneys and judges to honestly acknowledge relevant case law decisions in any litigation action, and bring those relevant decision into the light of the litigation, even if that acknowledgement is harmful to their own argument issues. 

     They are supposed to strive to arrive at a fair and just outcome for each litigation process.  They are not supposed to develop sneaky, conniving, unfair and unethical litigation schemes and tactics to help them win a litigation contest.  However, Lon Jr. will show herein that those type situations are routinely practiced by attorneys and judges.

     The transcript record for that one-day trial showed clearly that the trial attorneys and the trial court judge failed to bring forth an acknowledgement of the relevance of the Supreme Court's controlling landmark case law decision that prohibited surprise "ambush" complaints during a trial.  They all ignored that critically important controlling (must be complied with) case law decision - as if it did not exist.

     Those were criminal collusive and conspiratorial litigation actions that caused an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt Final Judgment to be rendered for said case.

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. has shown herein that the "defense attorney" objected four time to the introduction of surprise (ambush) complaints.  Consequently, it was very clear that there was no agreement of the parties to litigate any of the five surprise complaints. 

     Lon Jr. did not have any experience with trial court litigation, and he did not know anything about how a "defense" attorney should make proper objections to the introduction of surprise (ambush) complaint issues after a trial was in progress.

     He learned many months later that the four objections that his "defense" attorney had made during that trial were grossly inadequate objections because none of those objections showed that defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was being denied fundamental due process of law standards (was denied notice and discovery actions, was denied a fair opportunity to prepare defensive arguments).  The objections failed to show that he would be prejudiced severely (damaged or injured) if the trial court judge allowed testimony about the surprise (ambush) complaint issues to influence the trial.  

     Consequently, the "defense" attorney's four severely inadequate objections would not provide good reasons for an appellate court to reverse a Final Judgment that contained judicial adjudications involving the five surprise (ambush) complaint issues.

     It is important to understand that defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had written a letter to his "defense" attorney well-ahead of the trial conducted on September 8, 1989 that specifically requested that he take whatever actions would be needed to protect all appeal rights.  With 20+ years of litigation experience, the "defense" attorney then failed to make any objections during trial that protected Lon Jr's appeal rights.

    However, those inadequate objections during the trial did not give the trial judge any authority or opportunity or reason to ignore the Supreme Court's landmark controlling directive to all trial judges in the distant state.  The judge was duty bound to comply with that controlling directive - no surprise complaints allowed during trial.  Both of the trial attorneys and the judge ignored that landmark controlling directive, as if it did not exist. 

    The trial court judge should not have allowed testimony about the surprise complaints to be presented during the trial, and he should not have used three of the five surprise complaint issues to improperly justify the removal of very competent co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. from any further management of the substantial size family trust estate.

     It is very important to re-emphasize that both of the trial attorneys ignored the state's Supreme Court's controlling directive, and the circuit court judge also ignored the controlling directive (a binding, controlling directive that must be complied with) - to not allow any surprise complaint issues during a trial proceeding - none!!!!!!

     After reading the Final Judgment for that trial proceeding, Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's did not know anything about that Supreme Court's landmark case law decision, but he knew that the one-day trial and the Final Judgment that was rendered later had been a terrible miscarriage of justice.  The trial had been an extremely unfair proceeding.

     Lon Jr. communicated by telephone with the court reporter in the distant state that he had hired to transcribe the trial, and he requested that she prepare a transcript record for the one-day trial.  He promptly paid the $1,350 fee for that lengthy 267 pages two-volume transcript and had the transcript record mailed directly to him in South Carolina. 

     After Lon Willoughby, Jr. reviewed the lengthy transcript twice, it appeared to him that his trusted "defense" attorney had betrayed his trust by knowingly and willingly "cooperating" with the plaintiff's attorney's unfair and unethical scheme to "ambush" co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. during trial using five surprise complaint issues that were used to fabricate a heinous ambush "mismanagement" complaint against the co-trustee. 

     At that point in time, Lon Jr. did not know what type of objections his "defense" attorney should have made at trial, and he presumed that the objections that had been made were good responsible objections to the surprise complaints being introduced - although the transcript record showed that the trial court judge instantly "overruled" each objection.  After all, the "defense" attorney had 20+ years experience as a trial attorney in the distant state's court systems - surely he had objected properly to the introduction of surprise "ambush" complaint issues after the trial was in progress.

     After reviewing the Final Judgment rendered, and the trial transcript carefully, Lon Jr. then communicated with his "defense" attorney by telephone and asked him to file a Motion for Rehearing that might get the trial court judge to reconsider some of the extremely unfair and unethical statements that were contained in the Final Judgment.  

     The "defense" attorney flatly refused to help Lon Jr. by filing a Motion for Rehearing of that grossly unfair and unethical Final Judgment.  At that time, Lon Jr. realized that the "defense" attorney had in fact betrayed him during trial (as Lon Jr. already suspected).

     He promptly fired the "defense" attorney that had ruthlessly betrayed him in the litigation that had occurred up to that point in time.  Defendant Willoughby realized that he needed to fire (terminate) the attorney before he filed his Motion for Rehearing pro se. He realized that he would need to inform the circuit court judge about that situation, otherwise that attorney would still be representing Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. before the circuit court and Lon Willoughby, Jr. would not be able to begin proceeding pro se (without attorney assistance) in the case.  

     Lon Jr. had to try to learn how to file a Motion for Rehearing pro se.  He did not have any knowledge or understanding of what he needed to do to file said motion, and he had to do a lot of legal research about that legal issue as quickly as possible.

      He got his Motion for Rehearing filed responsibly within the time limit authorized, and the judge summarily dismissed the motion without allowing a hearing for said motion.

     There was nothing else that Lon Jr. do at that point except to file an appeal, but Lon Jr. knew nothing about appeal procedures.  He realized that his "defense" attorney had knowingly and willfully betrayed his trust and his very important litigation interests during that trial, and also in subsequent actions after trial with the Motion for Rehearing situation, so Lon Jr. could not rely upon that attorney to represent him in an appeal case. 

     Normally, a litigant will want their trial attorney to represent them on appeal because that attorney will be well acquainted with all of the litigation actions that had occurred up to that point in time.

     Having to hire a new attorney for an appeal process means that the attorney will first have to review the complex litigation process that has occurred up to that point and become familiar with the entire case so he can understand what has gone on in the trial court actions.  That of course means that the appeal process will be more expensive because of the attorney time involved in having to review the entire case, before the attorney can begin to develop the argument issues for the appeal's Initial Brief

     NOTES:  An appeal argument issue is one specific "argument subject" that is explained in detail, with supporting relevant case law decision references, and also specific references to the Record on Appeal (record documents).  All of that information must present a reasonable and responsible basis for the appellate court judges to review and understand the complained about case issues in the trial court actions.  The argument issues must provide adequate information for the appellate court judges to have a good basis for reversing the trial court judge's Final Judgment and send the case back to the trial court for more litigation actions. 

     An Initial Brief may contain one or more argument issues, designated individually as Argument Issue I, Argument Issue II, Argument Issue III, etc.  However, the opposing party, the appellee's attorney, is authorized to file a Response Brief that provides the appellee's arguments about why the Final Judgment should not be reversed.  The appellant then gets to file a Reply Brief that addresses the specific issues raised in the appellee's Response Brief.  The appellant cannot raise new issues in the Reply Brief.

     It is very important to understand that appellate court judges are strongly inclined to support the trial court judge's actions in the case.  After all, the judge is much more familiar with all of the issues in the case than the appellate court judges. 

     The trial court judge was actually there during the trial, and he got to see and observe and hear the litigant's testimony throughout the trial process.  He obviously knows more about the case than the appellate court judges so they usually tend to err on the side of agreeing with the trial judge's judicial decision or judgment about the case.

     It is usually an uphill process to try to get a trial court decision or judgment reversed during an appeal case, and approximately 80% of the time, an appeal case will not obtain a reversal of the trial court's decision or judgment.  The appellate court judges will usually Affirm (approve) the trial court's actions for the disputed case.  It takes a very good compelling legal argument to show a solid basis for obtaining a reversal of the trial court judge's opinion, decision, or judgment for the litigation actions complained about.

     Lon Jr. has gone through more than ten appeal processes at this point in time, but back in November 1989, he knew nothing about these appeal issues, and he had to quickly learn what he needed to do to timely file a proper Notice of AppealHe had purchased a copy of that state's Judicial Rules of Procedures so he understood that the document had to be filed withing a specific time period (30 days). 

     He learned how to accomplish that task competently, and he timely file his Notice of Appeal about that unfair, unethical, corrupt and and fraudulent Final Judgment.  This was his first appeal ever, and at that point in time, Lon Willoughby, Jr. did not know anything at all about what he needed do to present a potentially successful appeal.

     Lon Jr. then hired an experienced appellate attorney, located in the distant city where the appellate court was located.  When the appeal attorney subsequently filed appellant Willoughby's Initial Brief, he argued that the surprise complaints should not have been allowed into the trial, but he also ignored the state's Supreme Court's controlling case law directive about prohibiting surprise complaints after a trial was in progress.  Remember that Lon Jr. did not learn about the existence of that very important case until many months later - as explained below.

     That critically important case law citation and related argument could have enabled Lon Jr's appeal attorney to provide a solid basis for the three appellate court judges to reverse the trial court's Final Judgement - which had improperly removed co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. from any further management actions with his deceased father's trust estate - based upon the trial court judge's improper adjudication of the surprise "ambush" complaint issues that were then used to fabricate an unfair and unethical  ambush "mismanagement" complaint against co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. 

     The trial court judge had improperly allowed the plaintiff's attorney's unfair, unethical, and extremely corrupt "ambush complaints scheme" to succeed during the one-day non-jury trial - in direct conflict with the state's Supreme Court's controlling directive to not allow surprise complaints to be adjudicated during a trial proceeding.

     Appellant Lon Willoughby, Jr. had not yet learned about that very important Supreme Court case law decision that was critically important to his appeal case arguments.  He finally learned about that very important case many months later when he was doing his legal research for his first appeal Petition for Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.

     Lon Jr. therefore concluded many months later that his "trusted" appeal attorney had apparently "pretended" that he did not know about the state's Supreme Court's very important case law decision (prohibiting surprise complaints during trials in that state). 

     Remember, the appellee's attorney (plaintiff's attorney during the trial) also pretended during the appeal case that he did not know about that relevant Supreme Court case law decision.  This was the same attorney that had pretended during the trial below that he didn't know about this very important state Supreme Court's landmark controlling decision that applied to every trial court proceeding in that state's judicial system. 

     Every trial attorney and every trial court judge in that state would have surely been educated about that landmark controlling case.  It was critically important that they understand the controlling directives provided by that case law decision that clearly prohibited the introduction of surprise "ambush" complaints during a trial proceeding.   

     However, let's also understand that the appellate court judges surely knew about the state's Supreme Court's controlling case law directive (prohibiting surprise complaints during a trial proceeding), and those three judges should have used their very important knowledge of relevant case law to reverse the unfair and unethical trial court's Final Judgment error of allowing in five "ambush" complaints after the trial was in progress.

     The three appellate court judges surely knew about the Supreme Court's landmark controlling case law directive that applied to all trial court proceedings in that state.  However, during their subsequent Affirmed, Per Curium decision with no written opinion for the appeal, all three appellate court judges pretended that they did not know about that critically important state's Supreme Court's controlling directive case law decision.

     They "cooperatively" allowed the extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt "ambush complaints scheme" to be approved as an effective trial court litigation tactic.

     It was very clear to those three appellate court judges that the trial court's improper adjudication of the surprise "ambush" complaints was in direct conflict with the state's Supreme Court's controlling litigation directive: no surprise complaints allowed at trial

     That fundamental due process of law standard was clearly required to be provided by all trial court judges in all trial court litigation in that state.  Consequently, it is clear that all appellate court judges in that state would be well acquainted with that decision.

     In that trial (9/8/1989), we had two trial attorneys that ignored that state's Supreme Court's controlling directive that clearly prohibited surprise complaints during a trial proceeding.  We also had a circuit court judge who knowingly and willfully ignored that controlling Supreme Court directive.  (controlling directive - must be complied with)

     On appeal, we had two appellate court attorneys (appellant Willoughby's attorney and the appellee's attorney) who pretended that they did not know about that landmark  Supreme Court's controlling case law directive.  (Unfair, unethical, and corrupt attorney actions in the trial court and then again in the subsequent appellate court proceeding). 

     Lastly, we had three appellate court judges that also pretended that they did not know about that long-standing Supreme Court's landmark controlling case law directive(Extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt judicial actions by three appellate court judges.)

     All of them (attorneys and judges) were duty bound to comply with their state's Bar Association ethical standards that clearly obligated them to seek fairness and justice in every litigation process.  Those ethics standards required them to present any relevant established legal standards that were important for arriving at a fair and just outcome for the litigation process. 

     The attorneys were duty bound to present relevant case law decisions, even if those decisions would be harmful to their side of the case.  Remember, "they" are clearly duty bound to provide fair, responsible, and just litigation actions in an honorable way.  They are not supposed to be highly educated, trained, and skilled corrupt deceivers, liars, and thieves.  This detailed report shows repeatedly - that is how they typically operate.

    Those Bar Association's ethics standards clearly prohibited trial court attorneys from using unfair, unethical schemes or tactics that could help them win a litigation contest improperly - and yet those prohibited reprehensible trial court actions are what actually happened with defendant co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby's litigation process, from the beginning of the litigation to the end of the appeal case adjudication explained above.

     All attorneys and all judges clearly ignored their Bar Association's ethics standards and also ignored the state's Supreme Court's controlling directive that prohibited surprise "ambush complaints" during trials.  All of the attorneys and all of the judges clearly acted to knowingly and willfully obstruct the cause of justice for said litigation processes wherever they could take those reprehensible unfair, unethical, corrupt judicial actions

     The information reported above shows very clearly what an outrageously corrupt self-serving group of scoundrel type litigation arrogant "elitist" corrupt aristocratic despots and tyrants those members of the "legal brotherhood" turned out to be. 

     They all "cooperated" with the extremely unfair, unethical, and vile "ambush complaints" trial court litigation scheme and tactic that was used to maliciously and ruthlessly harass, persecute, and punish non-resident co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. (a long-time resident of another southern state), and a very competent, very responsible family member co-trustee for almost seven years with no pay at all for his valuable work. 

     Why did all of those attorneys and all of those judges commit those criminal-minded collusive and conspiratorial acts against non-resident Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.?  They wanted to punish him because co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. had competently and responsibly helped his aging parents develop, establish, and properly fund an excellent Amended Trust Agreement that provided the management and settlement plans that his aging parents wanted for their substantial size estate value (about 1.2 million dollars).

     As explained previously, the Amended Trust Agreement was subsequently used by the two co-trustees to manage the trust estate in the way that both parents mutually agreed upon.  The amendment also legally minimized federal estate taxes (down to zero dollars), saving the Willoughby family about $225,000 in federal estate taxes after Lon Jr's father died on November 22, 1986

     Lon Jr's personal drafting and development of the Amended Trust Agreement had also minimized state probate settlement expenses to less than $400.00 ($300.00 of that amount was a required appraisal fee for a vacant lot that was in the trust estate value). 

     Lon Jr's very competent co-trustee actions in that regard likely saved the Willoughby family $50,000+ in typical probate attorney expense fees (typically about 8% of the estate value - in this situation, more than $700,000). 

     Lon Jr's knowledgeable and responsible co-trustee actions had properly funded that amount of value into the trust estate.  The trust estate value was not subject to the probate process attorney fees.  Consequently, the Willoughby family avoided the typical $50,000+ in probate attorney fees because there were no probate attorney fees (zero $$).

     Moving that estate value into the Amended Trust Agreement had simultaneously avoided the federal estate taxes and the probate attorney fees as explained above. 

     Now remember that the circuit court trial judge's Final Judgment for the equity court trial conducted on September 8, 1989 "convicted" co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. of trust estate "mismanagement" using three fabricated false surprise "ambush" complaints to accomplish that extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt Final Judgment.

     That corrupt Final Judgment also claimed that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. was incompetent as a co-trustee regarding the amendment actions, totally destroying what had been an excellent reputation with all of his relatives, on both sides of his family - his father's side of the family and his mother's side of the family.      

     Over time, word circulated around among relatives about statements contained in that Final Judgment that were very detrimental to Lon Willoughby, Jr., and those extremely false statements destroyed Lon Willoughby, Jr's previously very good reputation with all family members and close relatives for the rest of his life.  Eventually, word about those family issues also circulated around and those conversations severely damaged Lon Jr's reputation with good friends that he had been in high school with in North Carolina.

     At this point, visitors to this department can begin to understand what an extreme miscarriage of justice was accomplished with the five surprise "ambush" complaints. Let's also remember that co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's very competent and very experienced "defense" attorney knowingly and willfully betrayed his trusting client by allowed the plaintiff's attorney's extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt "ambush complaints" scheme to work in the equity court trial process on September 8, 1989

     The "defense" attorney could have easily stopped that ambush complaints scheme with adequate objections, but he did not do that.  He unfairly, unethically, and corruptly   helped the plaintiff's attorney succeed with his heinous "ambush" complaints scheme by skillfully presenting inadequate objections to those surprise complaint issues as they were introduced during the trial.  He also failed to call the court's attention to the state Supreme Court's controlling case law prohibition of surprise complaints during a trial.

     We also need to remember that the experienced circuit court judge also "cooperated" with that "ambush complaints" scheme, and he knowingly and willfully ignored the critically important state Supreme Court's controlling directive that clearly prohibited allowing surprise complaints to be entered into the litigation process during a trial.  

     Based upon these revelations, what kind of ethics and integrity did all of the trial attorneys, appeal attorneys, the trial court judge, and the three appellate court judges have?  They had no ethics, no honesty, and no integrity at all. 

     They were all extremely unfair, unethical, deceitful, and corrupt selfish self-serving scoundrels - arrogant narcissistic "elitist" aristocratic despots and tyrants, who did anything they could to maliciously and ruthlessly harass, persecute, and punish severely co-trustee Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. for having been a very competent co-trustee.

     They ruthlessly damaged and destroyed his good reputation with family members and relatives, and friends, as explained above, and they cost him many thousands of dollars with their unfair, unethical, corrupt and fraudulent judicial actions. 

     This very important report shows that those ruthless judicial actions continued to interfere with his life severely for 20+ years of ongoing related litigation actions that "they" (members of the legal brotherhood) caused to further persecute and punish him.

     This report shows that "they" maliciously and ruthlessly tried to destroy him as an honest and decent and ethical human being, and for 20+ years they tried to sadistically and vindictively destroy his self-employed business as a healthcare and wellness store owner.  Folks, Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. is exposing some really serious judicial corruption in this very important report. 

     You will learn herein that the judges involved (trial court judges and appellate court judges) did not want to be fair-minded reasonable and responsible judges.  They demonstrated repeatedly that they wanted to be omnipotent despots who could take any judicial actions that would be beneficial to a member of the "legal brotherhood' - no matter how unfair, unethical, and corrupt those self-serving judicial actions might be.


Why Did They Take Those Actions?

     Why did they do those ruthless actions with Lonnie Willoughby, Jr., when the evidence produced at trial showed clearly that he had been a very competent and responsible family member co-trustee for about seven years - with no pay for his work that had enabled the Amended Trust Agreement to work the way his parents wanted it to work. 

     "They" took those cowardly ruthless judicial actions because Lon Jr's very competent estate planning work with the Amended Trust Agreement had legally and properly enabled the Willoughby family to avoid about $50,000 in probate attorney fees in the distant state.  That is what they were so critically abusive about.  How could a non-resident co-trustee who was not an estate planning attorney manage to do that successfully?  They could not allow him to get away with those responsible actions.

      The actions reported previously were their extremely unfair and unethical ways of punishing non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. maliciously, ruthlessly, and vindictively for those remarkable estate planning achievements as a non-attorney. 

     Remember that Lonnie Willoughby, Jr. consulted with five additional estate planning type attorneys in the distant state - while trying to find an attorney knowledgeable enough to help him develop the amendment document that was needed to accomplish several important management objectives for his father's Trust Agreement estate.

     Lon Jr. had limited time available for trying to locate an estate planning type attorney due to his father's very poor health condition (subject to die at any time), and due to Lon Jr's very heavy workload with his parent's business.  He was typically working 80 to 100 hours per week, and he eventually ran out of time for getting an attorney to amend the Trust Agreement for his father.

     He had no viable option left except to learn how to personally draft the needed amendment document to amend his father's Trust Agreement to enable the two co-trustees to achieve his parent's mutually desired objectives for said trust estate.

     Lon Willoughby, Jr. is now 82 years of age, and he was involved with litigation actions in that distant state for more than 20 years of ongoing malicious and ruthless sadistic and vindictive harassment, persecution, and punishment litigation actions as a result of his very competent and responsible estate planning actions for his parents. 

     He has learned to never trust any attorney, or lawyer, and never trust any judge.  Do not expect any judge to have any sense of fairness, or honesty, or integrity, or reasonable and sensible judgment - because they typically don't have those essential judicial values.

     Lon's experiences with judges over 20+ years (as reported herein later) is that they are usually focused on being an extremely unfair, unethical, and corrupt arrogant pompous "elitist" aristocratic despot and tyrant.  If you anticipate those characteristics from members of the legal brotherhood, you won't be disappointed very often. 

      That is especially true when any member of the "legal brotherhood" is prosecuting  any kind of litigation action against any person who is not a member of the "legal brotherhood."  That is a very important statement - think about it for a moment.

     Let's learn some more about those types of arrogant pompous "elitist" aristocratic despotic and tyrannical selfish and self-serving litigation actions and judicial actions.


Overview Information

December 1993


      The complex case had now been transferred from the circuit court to the county court.  At that same time, during Christmas season 1993, plaintiff Lon Willoughby, Jr. was very busy preparing responsive legal briefs opposing legal briefs that had been filed by three attorneys in plaintiff Lonnie Willoughby's federal civil action case in the nearby federal court. (75 miles away from the relevant state's county and circuit court.) 

    Lon Jr. had observed before that attorneys will tactically use the holidays as a time to bunch up litigation actions on an opposing party - to make it more difficult and frustrating for that person to meet some of the tight deadlines that are usually involved in many litigation actions.  The pursuit of fair and impartial justice is not considered by them; it is strictly a matter of using any unfair conniving scheme or tactic that can help them win a litigation action, in any unfair, unethical, corrupt and fraudulent manner possible. 

     All of those kinds of litigation actions are in direct conflict with their state Bar Association's ethics standards - explained previously.  But remember, that is all "window dressing" for gullible people who want to believe that the "legal brotherhood" actually pays attention to those "ethics standards" and responsibly strives to comply with them. Lon's experiences over 20+ years is that attorneys, lawyers, and judges pay no attention to those ethics standards - none at all.


Additional Litigation Actions

in the County Court

     After the circuit court case was transferred down to the county court's jurisdiction in December 1993, the plaintiff law firm and the firm's attorney (the extremely corrupt FDA) started filing litigation actions in the county court against non-resident defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr.    

     Defendant Lonnie Willoughby, Jr's counterclaim pleadings had initially moved the case from the county court into the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court because the $600,000 damage amount pleaded in Willoughby's Counterclaim Complaints greatly exceeded the County Court's jurisdictional dollar limit.